These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31176186)

  • 61. Development of a clinician-administered National Institutes of Health-Brief Fatigue Inventory: A measure of fatigue in the context of depressive disorders.
    Saligan LN; Luckenbaugh DA; Slonena EE; Machado-Vieira R; Zarate CA
    J Psychiatr Res; 2015 Sep; 68():99-105. PubMed ID: 26228407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. A review of studies of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale in controls: implications for the definition of remission in treatment studies of depression.
    Zimmerman M; Chelminski I; Posternak M
    Int Clin Psychopharmacol; 2004 Jan; 19(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 15101563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Efficacy of new-generation antidepressants assessed with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, the gold standard clinician rating scale: A meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials.
    Hengartner MP; Jakobsen JC; Sørensen A; Plöderl M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229381. PubMed ID: 32101579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. The Koukopoulos Mixed Depression Rating Scale (KMDRS): An International Mood Network (IMN) validation study of a new mixed mood rating scale.
    Sani G; Vöhringer PA; Barroilhet SA; Koukopoulos AE; Ghaemi SN
    J Affect Disord; 2018 May; 232():9-16. PubMed ID: 29459190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Validity of Beck Depression Inventory for the assessment of depressive mood in chronic heart failure patients.
    Lahlou-Laforêt K; Ledru F; Niarra R; Consoli SM;
    J Affect Disord; 2015 Sep; 184():256-60. PubMed ID: 26118753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Relative sensitivity of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale, the Hamilton depression rating scale and the Clinical Global Impressions rating scale in antidepressant clinical trials: a replication analysis.
    Khan A; Brodhead AE; Kolts RL
    Int Clin Psychopharmacol; 2004 May; 19(3):157-60. PubMed ID: 15107658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. A comparison of the 'Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression' and the 'Montgomery-Asberg Depression rating Scale'.
    Huijbrechts IP; Haffmans PM; Jonker K; van Dijke A; Hoencamp E
    Acta Neuropsychiatr; 1999 Mar; 11(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 26976104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. The Montgomery-Asberg Depression Scale: reliability and validity.
    Davidson J; Turnbull CD; Strickland R; Miller R; Graves K
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 1986 May; 73(5):544-8. PubMed ID: 3751660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. [New validation of the Montgomery and Asberg Depression Scale (MADRS) on a sample of 147 hospitalized depressed patients].
    Peyre F; Martinez R; Calache M; Verdoux H; Bourgeois M
    Ann Med Psychol (Paris); 1989 Sep; 147(7):762-7. PubMed ID: 2694887
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia: a study of the validity of a French-language version in a population of schizophrenic patients.
    Bernard D; Lançon C; Auquier P; Reine G; Addington D
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 1998 Jan; 97(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 9504701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Study of the concurrent validity of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenics (CDSS).
    Lançon C; Auquier P; Reine G; Bernard D; Toumi M
    J Affect Disord; 2000 May; 58(2):107-15. PubMed ID: 10781700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Reliability and validity of the telephone-based version of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale for assessing depression in individuals with primary brain tumour.
    Harris G; Jones S; Pinkham MB; Lion KM; Ownsworth T
    Disabil Rehabil; 2024 Mar; 46(6):1158-1166. PubMed ID: 37021336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Measuring depression: comparison and integration of three scales in the GENDEP study.
    Uher R; Farmer A; Maier W; Rietschel M; Hauser J; Marusic A; Mors O; Elkin A; Williamson RJ; Schmael C; Henigsberg N; Perez J; Mendlewicz J; Janzing JG; Zobel A; Skibinska M; Kozel D; Stamp AS; Bajs M; Placentino A; Barreto M; McGuffin P; Aitchison KJ
    Psychol Med; 2008 Feb; 38(2):289-300. PubMed ID: 17922940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [Validation of HARD (Hamilton depression rating scale) a diagram of the evaluation of depression by MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale) Multicentric study of mianserin].
    Ferreri M; Cousin FR; Rufin JC; Alby JM
    Encephale; 1986; 12(6):343-50. PubMed ID: 3545786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Assessment of depression in Parkinson's disease: the contribution of somatic symptoms to the clinimetric performance of the Hamilton and Montgomery-Asberg rating scales.
    Reijnders JS; Lousberg R; Leentjens AF
    J Psychosom Res; 2010 Jun; 68(6):561-5. PubMed ID: 20488273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Development and validation of the Affective Self Rating Scale for manic, depressive, and mixed affective states.
    Adler M; Liberg B; Andersson S; Isacsson G; Hetta J
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2008; 62(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 18569776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia.
    Sarró S; Dueñas RM; Ramírez N; Arranz B; Martínez R; Sánchez JM; González JM; Saló L; Miralles L; San L
    Schizophr Res; 2004 Jun; 68(2-3):349-56. PubMed ID: 15099616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. The clinical relevance of changes in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale using the minimum clinically important difference approach.
    Duru G; Fantino B
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2008 May; 24(5):1329-35. PubMed ID: 18377706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Quantifying depressive symptomatology: inter-rater reliability and inter-item correlations.
    Kørner A; Nielsen BM; Eschen F; Møller-Madsen S; Stender A; Christensen EM; Aggernaes H; Kastrup M; Larsen JK
    J Affect Disord; 1990 Oct; 20(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 2148329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Assessing depression severity with a self-rated vs. rater-administered instrument in patients with epilepsy.
    Jamal-Omidi S; Collins C; Fulchiero E; Liu H; Colon-Zimmermann K; Fuentes-Casiano E; Tatsuoka C; Cassidy KA; Lhatoo S; Sajatovic M
    Epilepsy Behav; 2018 Aug; 85():52-57. PubMed ID: 29908384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.