144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31176392)
1. Hydrophilic modification of sandblasted and acid-etched implants improves stability during early healing: a human double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Velloso G; Moraschini V; Dos Santos Porto Barboza E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 May; 48(5):684-690. PubMed ID: 31176392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Resonance frequency analysis of dental implants placed at the posterior maxilla varying the surface treatment only: A randomized clinical trial.
Novellino MM; Sesma N; Zanardi PR; Laganá DC
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Oct; 19(5):770-775. PubMed ID: 28631408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.
Bornstein MM; Hart CN; Halbritter SA; Morton D; Buser D
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 19438966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Resonance Frequency Analysis of Thermal Acid-Etched, Hydrophilic Implants During First 3 Months of Healing and Osseointegration in an Early-Loading Protocol.
van Eekeren P; Said C; Tahmaseb A; Wismeijer D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(4):843-50. PubMed ID: 26252037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Secondary stability achieved in dental implants with a calcium-coated sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) surface and a chemically modified SLA surface placed without mechanical engagement: A preclinical study.
Song YW; Paeng KW; Kim MJ; Cha JK; Jung UW; Jung RE; Thoma DS
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Dec; 32(12):1474-1483. PubMed ID: 34547819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stability change of chemically modified sandblasted/acid-etched titanium palatal implants. A randomized-controlled clinical trial.
Schätzle M; Männchen R; Balbach U; Hämmerle CH; Toutenburg H; Jung RE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 May; 20(5):489-95. PubMed ID: 19302392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison between tapered and cylindrical implants in the posterior regions of the mandible: A prospective, randomized, split-mouth clinical trial focusing on implant stability changes during early healing.
Waechter J; Madruga MM; Carmo Filho LCD; Leite FRM; Schinestsck AR; Faot F
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Aug; 19(4):733-741. PubMed ID: 28557376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Immediate loading of dental implants supporting fixed partial dentures in the posterior mandible: a randomized controlled split-mouth study--machined versus titanium oxide implant surface.
Schincaglia GP; Marzola R; Scapoli C; Scotti R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):35-46. PubMed ID: 17340895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Resonance frequency analysis of one-stage dental implant stability during the osseointegration period.
Ersanli S; Karabuda C; Beck F; Leblebicioglu B
J Periodontol; 2005 Jul; 76(7):1066-71. PubMed ID: 16018748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Resonance frequency analysis of 208 Straumann dental implants during the healing period.
Guler AU; Sumer M; Duran I; Sandikci EO; Telcioglu NT
J Oral Implantol; 2013 Apr; 39(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 22103915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Implant Stability Quotients of Osteotome Bone Expansion and Conventional Drilling Technique for 4.1 mm Diameter Implant at Posterior Mandible.
Hong HH; Hong A; Yang LY; Chang WY; Huang YF; Lin YT
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 19(2):253-260. PubMed ID: 27665748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can implant surfaces affect implant stability during osseointegration? A randomized clinical trial.
Carmo Filho LCD; Marcello-Machado RM; Castilhos ED; Del Bel Cury AA; Faot F
Braz Oral Res; 2018 Oct; 32():e110. PubMed ID: 30379212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bone changes around early loaded chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched surfaced implants with and without a machined collar: a radiographic and resonance frequency analysis in the canine mandible.
Valderrama P; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Higginbottom F; Schoolfield JD; Jung RE; Noujeim M; Cochran DL
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):548-57. PubMed ID: 20556254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant stability measurement of delayed and immediately loaded implants during healing.
Bischof M; Nedir R; Szmukler-Moncler S; Bernard JP; Samson J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Oct; 15(5):529-39. PubMed ID: 15355394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: II. Implant surface modifications and implant diameter.
Han J; Lulic M; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jun; 21(6):605-11. PubMed ID: 20666787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical evaluation of laser-etched Ti implant surfaces vs. chemically modified SLA Ti implant surfaces: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbit tibias.
Lee JT; Cho SA
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Aug; 61():299-307. PubMed ID: 27093590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of implant design on marginal bone changes around early loaded, chemically modified, sandblasted Acid-etched-surfaced implants: a histologic analysis in dogs.
Valderrama P; Bornstein MM; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Higginbottom FL; Cochran DL
J Periodontol; 2011 Jul; 82(7):1025-34. PubMed ID: 21142981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Resonance Frequency Analysis of Sand Blasted Acid Etched (SAE) and Chemical Modified Sae Dental Implants.
Beena Kumary TP; Parihar AS; Mathew J; Sabu KI; Venkata SK; Babaji P
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent; 2019; 9(1):55-59. PubMed ID: 30923694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conventional SLA and chemically modified SLA implants in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus--a randomized controlled trial.
Khandelwal N; Oates TW; Vargas A; Alexander PP; Schoolfield JD; Alex McMahan C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jan; 24(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 22145978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histomorphometric evaluation of a dual acid-etched vs. a chemically modified hydrophilic dual acid-etched implant surface. An experimental study in dogs.
de Jesus RNR; Stavropoulos A; Oliveira MTF; Soares PBF; Moura CCG; Zanetta-Barbosa D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 May; 28(5):551-557. PubMed ID: 27006317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
