These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

442 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31176452)

  • 1. Hardness and fracture toughness of resin-composite materials with and without fibers.
    Alshabib A; Silikas N; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2019 Aug; 35(8):1194-1203. PubMed ID: 31176452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Polymerization and shrinkage kinetics and fracture toughness of bulk-fill resin-composites.
    Yang J; Silikas N; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2022 Dec; 38(12):1934-1941. PubMed ID: 38709119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ion releasing direct restorative materials: Key mechanical properties and wear.
    Daabash R; Alshabib A; Alqahtani MQ; Price RB; Silikas N; Alshaafi MM
    Dent Mater; 2022 Dec; 38(12):1866-1877. PubMed ID: 36202659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surface hardness and flexural strength of dual-cured bulk-fill restorative materials after solvent storage.
    Alzahrani B; Alshabib A; Awliya W
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 May; 23(1):306. PubMed ID: 37208664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fracture toughness comparison of six resin composites.
    Watanabe H; Khera SC; Vargas MA; Qian F
    Dent Mater; 2008 Mar; 24(3):418-25. PubMed ID: 17697707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Material behavior of resin composites with and without fibers after extended water storage.
    Alshabib A; Algamaiah H; Silikas N; Watts DC
    Dent Mater J; 2021 May; 40(3):557-565. PubMed ID: 33731541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fracture Toughness of Nanohybrid and Hybrid Composites Stored Wet and Dry up to 60 Days.
    Sookhakiyan M; Tavana S; Azarnia Y; Bagheri R
    J Dent Biomater; 2017 Mar; 4(1):341-346. PubMed ID: 28959763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanical and structural characterization of discontinuous fiber-reinforced dental resin composite.
    Bijelic-Donova J; Garoushi S; Lassila LV; Keulemans F; Vallittu PK
    J Dent; 2016 Sep; 52():70-8. PubMed ID: 27449703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel zirconia fibre-reinforced resin composite for dental use.
    Wang T; Tsoi JK; Matinlinna JP
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Jan; 53():151-160. PubMed ID: 26318575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation of mechanical properties of experimental Bis-GMA/TEGDMA dental composite resins containing various mass fractions of silica nanoparticles.
    Hosseinalipour M; Javadpour J; Rezaie H; Dadras T; Hayati AN
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Feb; 19(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 19895426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fracture toughness of experimental dental composites aged in ethanol.
    Ferracane JL; Berge HX
    J Dent Res; 1995 Jul; 74(7):1418-23. PubMed ID: 7560394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical properties of contemporary composite resins and their interrelations.
    Thomaidis S; Kakaboura A; Mueller WD; Zinelis S
    Dent Mater; 2013 Aug; 29(8):e132-41. PubMed ID: 23790281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of aging methods on the fracture toughness and physical stability of an oxirane/acrylate, ormocer, and Bis-GMA-based resin composites.
    Algamaiah H; Danso R; Banas J; Armstrong SR; Whang K; Rawls HR; Teixeira EC
    Clin Oral Investig; 2020 Jan; 24(1):369-375. PubMed ID: 31104114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of physical and biological properties of a flowable fiber reinforced and bulk filling composites.
    Attik N; Colon P; Gauthier R; Chevalier C; Grosgogeat B; Abouelleil H
    Dent Mater; 2022 Feb; 38(2):e19-e30. PubMed ID: 34961643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites.
    Kim KH; Ong JL; Okuno O
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):642-9. PubMed ID: 12131887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fracture toughness of seven resin composites evaluated by three methods of mode I fracture toughness (K
    Mese A; Ea Palamara J; Bagheri R; Fani M; Burrow MF
    Dent Mater J; 2016 Dec; 35(6):893-899. PubMed ID: 27680036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Post-cure depth of cure of bulk fill dental resin-composites.
    Alrahlah A; Silikas N; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2014 Feb; 30(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 24268044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. R-curve behavior and toughening mechanisms of resin-based dental composites: effects of hydration and post-cure heat treatment.
    Shah MB; Ferracane JL; Kruzic JJ
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jun; 25(6):760-70. PubMed ID: 19187956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative evaluation of fiber-reinforced, bulk-fill and conventional dental composites: Physical characteristics and polymerization properties.
    Pedram P; Jafarnia S; Shahabi S; Saberi S; Hajizamani H
    Polim Med; 2022; 52(1):13-18. PubMed ID: 35801996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of flowable bulk-fill and flowable resin-based composites: an in vitro analysis.
    Engelhardt F; Hahnel S; Preis V; Rosentritt M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Nov; 20(8):2123-2130. PubMed ID: 26745959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.