These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31178267)

  • 1. No differences in infections between patient-specific implants and conventional mini-plates in mandibular bilateral sagittal split osteotomy - Up to 3-year follow-up.
    Suojanen J; Järvinen S; Hodzic Z; Reunanen J; Leikola J; Stoor P
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Aug; 47(8):1181-1184. PubMed ID: 31178267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between patient specific implants and conventional mini-plates in Le Fort I osteotomy with regard to infections: No differences in up to 3-year follow-up.
    Suojanen J; Järvinen S; Kotaniemi KV; Reunanen J; Palotie T; Stoor P; Leikola J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 46(10):1814-1817. PubMed ID: 30097411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of patient-specific implants in orthognathic surgery: A series of 30 mandible sagittal split osteotomy patients.
    Suojanen J; Leikola J; Stoor P
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Jun; 45(6):990-994. PubMed ID: 28381373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of postoperative skeletal stability of maxillary segments after Le Fort I osteotomy, using patient-specific implant versus mini-plate fixation.
    Kotaniemi KVM; Heliövaara A; Kotaniemi M; Stoor P; Leikola J; Palotie T; Suojanen J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jul; 47(7):1020-1030. PubMed ID: 31085061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of bilateral sagittal split osteotomy lingual fracture line and le fort I pterygomaxillary separation in orthognathic surgery using cadaver heads: ultrasonic osteotome versus conventional saw.
    Dammous S; Dupont Q; Gilles R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 73(6):1169-80. PubMed ID: 25795191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Risk factors for breakage of biodegradable plate systems after bilateral sagittal split mandibular setback surgery.
    Yoshioka I; Igawa K; Nagata J; Yoshida M; Baba T; Ichiki T; Kondoh Y; Takamori K; Kashima K; Sakoda S
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 51(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 22784923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Short- and long-term changes of condylar position after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular advancement in combination with Le Fort I osteotomy evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography.
    Chen S; Lei J; Wang X; Fu KY; Farzad P; Yi B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Nov; 71(11):1956-66. PubMed ID: 23973047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The stability of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy and vertical ramus osteotomy after bimaxillary correction of class III malocclusion.
    Abeltins A; Jakobsone G; Urtane I; Bigestans A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 39(8):583-7. PubMed ID: 21334219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bad split during bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandible with separators: a retrospective study of 427 patients.
    Mensink G; Verweij JP; Frank MD; Eelco Bergsma J; Richard van Merkesteyn JP
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Sep; 51(6):525-9. PubMed ID: 23305697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Virtual Surgical Planning Combined With Intraoperative Navigation in Mandibular Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy for Accurate Placement of Patient Specific Implants.
    Järvinen S; Suojanen J; Suomalainen A; Stoor P
    J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 32(8):2666-2670. PubMed ID: 34260465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of bone formation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy using different fixation materials.
    Ueki K; Ishihara Y; Yoshizawa K; Moroi A; Ikawa H; Iguchi R; Kosaka A; Hotta A; Tsutsui T; Saida Y
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 43(5):710-6. PubMed ID: 25887426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Low to high oblique ramus piezoosteotomy: a pilot study.
    Landes C; Tran A; Ballon A; Santo G; Schübel F; Sader R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):901-9. PubMed ID: 24503387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Skeletal stability and condylar position related to fixation method following mandibular setback with bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Roh YC; Shin SH; Kim SS; Sandor GK; Kim YD
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1958-63. PubMed ID: 25441865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Extraoral vertical subcondylar osteotomy with rigid fixation for correction of mandibular prognathism. Comparison with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and surgical technique.
    Hågensli N; Stenvik A; Espeland L
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Apr; 41(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 23102564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of bone healing and hypoesthesia in the upper lip after Le Fort I osteotomy with self-setting α-tricalcium phosphate and absorbable plates.
    Ueki K; Okabe K; Marukawa K; Mukozawa A; Moroi A; Miyazaki M; Sotobori M; Ishihara Y; Yoshizawa K; Ooi K; Kawashiri S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 41(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 22819299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
    Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semirigid fixation of mandible and maxilla in orthognathic surgery: stability and advantages.
    Mavili ME; Canter HI; Saglam-Aydinatay B
    Ann Plast Surg; 2009 Oct; 63(4):396-403. PubMed ID: 19745712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stability of bicortical screw versus plate fixation after mandibular setback with the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Al-Moraissi EA; Ellis E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 45(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 26474933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Modified Novel Technique for Condylar Positioning in Mandibular Bilateral Sagittal Split Osteotomy Using Computer-Assisted Designed and Computer-Assisted Manufactured Surgical Guides.
    Cortese A; Chandran R; Borri A; Cataldo E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 May; 77(5):1069.e1-1069.e9. PubMed ID: 31046965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of biodegradable and titanium fixation systems in maxillofacial surgery: a two-year multi-center randomized controlled trial.
    van Bakelen NB; Buijs GJ; Jansma J; de Visscher JG; Hoppenreijs TJ; Bergsma JE; Stegenga B; Bos RR
    J Dent Res; 2013 Dec; 92(12):1100-5. PubMed ID: 24130219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.