These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31178644)

  • 41. Revisiting the intrauterine contraceptive device in adolescents.
    Toma A; Jamieson MA
    J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 19(4):291-6. PubMed ID: 16873034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A comparative trial of copper T 380 and Cu 375 IUCD.
    Khan SA; Ul Amin Z; Fouzia ; Jadoon S
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2010; 22(3):185-7. PubMed ID: 22338452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Immediate postpartum intrauterine device and implant program outcomes: a prospective analysis.
    Eggebroten JL; Sanders JN; Turok DK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):51.e1-51.e7. PubMed ID: 28342716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Influence of removal of intrauterine contraceptive devices on colonisation of the cervix by actinomyces-like organisms.
    Mao K; Guillebaud J
    Contraception; 1984 Dec; 30(6):535-44. PubMed ID: 6529911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Profile of intrauterine contraceptive device acceptors at the University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Uyo, Nigeria.
    Abasiattai AM; Bassey EA; Udoma EJ
    Ann Afr Med; 2008 Mar; 7(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 18702241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Complications after interval postpartum intrauterine device insertion.
    Ramos-Rivera M; Averbach S; Selvaduray P; Gibson A; Ngo LL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Jan; 226(1):95.e1-95.e8. PubMed ID: 34461075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Five-year review of copper T intrauterine device use at the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital, Calabar.
    Iklaki CU; Agbakwuru AU; Udo AE; Abeshi SE
    Open Access J Contracept; 2015; 6():143-147. PubMed ID: 29386931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Uterine perforation by a Copper 7 intrauterine contraceptive device with subsequent penetration of the appendix. Case report.
    McWhinney NA; Jarrett R
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1983 Aug; 90(8):774-6. PubMed ID: 6349675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [The migrating intrauterine device. Case report and review of the literature].
    Kassab B; Audra P
    Contracept Fertil Sex; 1999 Oct; 27(10):696-700. PubMed ID: 10605179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The role of multimodality radiological imaging in extrauterine misplaced IUCD: A case report.
    Badu-Peprah A; Adu-Bredu TK; Adu-Takyi C
    Afr J Reprod Health; 2020 Dec; 24(4):213-217. PubMed ID: 34077085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices.
    Heinemann K; Reed S; Moehner S; Minh TD
    Contraception; 2015 Apr; 91(4):274-9. PubMed ID: 25601352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Real-time ultrasound in locating intrauterine contraceptive devices.
    Nelson LH; Miller JB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Dec; 54(6):711-4. PubMed ID: 514557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Prolonged use of intrauterine contraceptive device as a risk factor for tubo-ovarian abscess.
    Charonis G; Larsson PG
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2009; 88(6):680-4. PubMed ID: 19412803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Factors affecting IUCD discontinuation in Nepal: a nested case-control study.
    Thapa S; Paudel IS; Bhattarai S; Joshi R; Thapa K
    Asia Pac J Public Health; 2015 Mar; 27(2):NP1280-7. PubMed ID: 22984134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device after induced or spontaneous abortion: a review of the evidence.
    Stanwood NL; Grimes DA; Schulz KF
    BJOG; 2001 Nov; 108(11):1168-73. PubMed ID: 11762657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Do plain plastic and copper bearing intrauterine contraceptive devices have a central mechanism of action?
    Goldstuck ND
    Med Hypotheses; 1987 Jun; 23(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 2956487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Estimated disability-adjusted life years averted by long-term provision of long acting contraceptive methods in a Brazilian clinic.
    Bahamondes L; Bottura BF; Bahamondes MV; Gonçalves MP; Correia VM; Espejo-Arce X; Sousa MH; Monteiro I; Fernandes A
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Oct; 29(10):2163-70. PubMed ID: 25085802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Six- and twelve-month documented removal rates among women electing postpartum inpatient compared to delayed or interval contraceptive implant insertions after Medicaid payment reform.
    Crockett AH; Pickell LB; Heberlein EC; Billings DL; Mills B
    Contraception; 2017 Jan; 95(1):71-76. PubMed ID: 27400823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Intrauterine contraceptive device embedded in bladder wall with calculus formation removed successfully with open surgery.
    Tan JH; Lip H; Ong W; Omar S
    Malays Fam Physician; 2019; 14(2):29-31. PubMed ID: 31827733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The IUCD in nulliparous women: with special reference to the Multiload copper 250 'mini' and 'short' IUCDs.
    Goldstuck ND
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Sep; 89(Suppl 4):54-7. PubMed ID: 7150528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.