These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31179512)

  • 1. Addressing research integrity challenges: from penalising individual perpetrators to fostering research ecosystem quality care.
    Zwart H; Ter Meulen R
    Life Sci Soc Policy; 2019 Jun; 15(1):5. PubMed ID: 31179512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Working with Research Integrity-Guidance for Research Performing Organisations: The Bonn PRINTEGER Statement.
    Forsberg EM; Anthun FO; Bailey S; Birchley G; Bout H; Casonato C; Fuster GG; Heinrichs B; Horbach S; Jacobsen IS; Janssen J; Kaiser M; Lerouge I; van der Meulen B; de Rijcke S; Saretzki T; Sutrop M; Tazewell M; Varantola K; Vie KJ; Zwart H; Zöller M
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Aug; 24(4):1023-1034. PubMed ID: 29855866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Promoting Virtue or Punishing Fraud: Mapping Contrasts in the Language of 'Scientific Integrity'.
    Horbach SPJM; Halffman W
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Dec; 23(6):1461-1485. PubMed ID: 27995445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differing Perceptions Concerning Research Integrity Between Universities and Industry: A Qualitative Study.
    Godecharle S; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2018 Oct; 24(5):1421-1436. PubMed ID: 28913604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Brazilian Science and Research Integrity: Where are We? What Next?
    Vasconcelos SM; Sorenson MM; Watanabe EH; Foguel D; Palácios M
    An Acad Bras Cienc; 2015; 87(2):1259-69. PubMed ID: 26131643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. RESPONSE_ABILITY A Card-Based Engagement Method to Support Researchers' Ability to Respond to Integrity Issues.
    Felt U; Frantz F
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2022 Mar; 28(2):14. PubMed ID: 35258720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Ethics of the System: Talking to Scientists About Research Integrity.
    Davies SR
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2019 Aug; 25(4):1235-1253. PubMed ID: 30251235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Misconduct in research administration: What is it? How widespread is it? And what should we do about it?
    Robert JS
    Account Res; 2023 Dec; 30(7):439-458. PubMed ID: 34989302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How do Chinese universities address research integrity and misconduct? A review of university documents.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Dev World Bioeth; 2019 Jun; 19(2):64-75. PubMed ID: 31091553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Research integrity and misconduct: a clarification of the concepts.
    Khanyile TD; Duma S; Fakude LP; Mbombo N; Daniels F; Sabone MS
    Curationis; 2006 Mar; 29(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 16817491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The integrity of science - lost in translation?
    Kaiser M
    Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol; 2014 Apr; 28(2):339-47. PubMed ID: 24810194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Expanding responsible conduct of research instruction across the university.
    Bulger RE; Heitman E
    Acad Med; 2007 Sep; 82(9):876-8. PubMed ID: 17726396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. European Universities' Guidance on Research Integrity and Misconduct.
    Aubert Bonn N; Godecharle S; Dierickx K
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Feb; 12(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 28220725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Important Topics for Fostering Research Integrity by Research Performing and Research Funding Organizations: A Delphi Consensus Study.
    Labib K; Roje R; Bouter L; Widdershoven G; Evans N; Marušić A; Mokkink L; Tijdink J
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2021 Jul; 27(4):47. PubMed ID: 34244889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Causal factors implicated in research misconduct: evidence from ORI case files.
    Davis MS; Riske-Morris M; Diaz SR
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2007 Dec; 13(4):395-414. PubMed ID: 18038194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Institutional and individual responsibilities for integrity in research.
    Steneck NH
    Am J Bioeth; 2002; 2(4):51-3. PubMed ID: 12762926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Promoting research integrity in Africa: an African voice of concern on research misconduct and the way forward.
    Kombe F; Anunobi EN; Tshifugula NP; Wassenaar D; Njadingwe D; Mwalukore S; Chinyama J; Randrianasolo B; Akindeh P; Dlamini PS; Ramiandrisoa FN; Ranaivo N
    Dev World Bioeth; 2014 Dec; 14(3):158-66. PubMed ID: 23594261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Responsible conduct of research: enhancing local opportunities.
    Mwaka ES
    Afr Health Sci; 2017 Jun; 17(2):584-590. PubMed ID: 29062357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prevention over cure: the administrative rationale for education in the responsible conduct of research.
    Vasgird DR
    Acad Med; 2007 Sep; 82(9):835-7. PubMed ID: 17726386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The present situation of and challenges in research ethics and integrity promotion: Experiences in East Asia.
    Chou C; Lee IJ; Fudano J
    Account Res; 2024 Aug; 31(6):576-599. PubMed ID: 36641764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.