These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31180427)

  • 21. Remediation of saline-sodic soil with flue gas desulfurization gypsum in a reclaimed tidal flat of southeast China.
    Mao Y; Li X; Dick WA; Chen L
    J Environ Sci (China); 2016 Jul; 45():224-32. PubMed ID: 27372137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Use of flue gas desulfurization gypsum for leaching Cd and Pb in reclaimed tidal flat soil.
    Yang P; Li X; Tong ZJ; Li QS; He BY; Wang LL; Guo SH; Xu ZM
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Apr; 23(8):7840-8. PubMed ID: 26758303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sustainable Uses of FGD Gypsum in Agricultural Systems: Introduction.
    Watts DB; Dick WA
    J Environ Qual; 2014 Jan; 43(1):246-52. PubMed ID: 25602557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mercury emission and plant uptake of trace elements during early stage of soil amendment using flue gas desulfurization materials.
    Cheng CM; Chang YN; Sistani KR; Wang YW; Lu WC; Lin CW; Dong JH; Hu CC; Pan WP
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Feb; 62(2):139-50. PubMed ID: 22442930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Fate of mercury in flue gas desulfurization gypsum determined by Temperature Programmed Decomposition and Sequential Chemical Extraction.
    Zhu Z; Zhuo Y; Fan Y; Wang Z
    J Environ Sci (China); 2016 May; 43():169-176. PubMed ID: 27155422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Metals in Soil and Runoff from a Piedmont Hay Field Amended with Broiler Litter and Flue Gas Desulfurization Gypsum.
    Schomberg HH; Endale DM; Jenkins MB; Chaney RL; Franklin DH
    J Environ Qual; 2018 Mar; 47(2):326-335. PubMed ID: 29634799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biogeochemical oxidation of calcium sulfite hemihydrate to gypsum in flue gas desulfurization byproduct using sulfur-oxidizing bacteria.
    Graves D; Smith JJ; Chen L; Kreinberg A; Wallace B; White R
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Oct; 201():357-365. PubMed ID: 28692835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reduction of orthophosphates loss in agricultural soil by nano calcium sulfate.
    Chen D; Szostak P; Wei Z; Xiao R
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jan; 539():381-387. PubMed ID: 26372940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Using flue gas desulfurization gypsum to remove dissolved phosphorus from agricultural drainage waters.
    Bryant RB; Buda AR; Kleinman PJ; Church CD; Saporito LS; Folmar GJ; Bose S; Allen AL
    J Environ Qual; 2012; 41(3):664-71. PubMed ID: 22565248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of fluidized gas desulfurization (FGD) gypsum on non-target freshwater and sediment dwelling organisms.
    Greenway SL; Moore MT; Farris JL; Rhoton FE
    Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 2011 May; 86(5):480-3. PubMed ID: 21431885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stabilized High Clay Content Lateritic Soil Using Cement-FGD Gypsum Mixtures for Road Subbase Applications.
    Maichin P; Jitsangiam P; Nongnuang T; Boonserm K; Nusit K; Pra-Ai S; Binaree T; Aryupong C
    Materials (Basel); 2021 Apr; 14(8):. PubMed ID: 33918054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Analysis the Compressive Strength of Flue Gas Desulfurization Gypsum Using Artificial Neural Network.
    Jang HS; Shuli X; So SY
    J Nanosci Nanotechnol; 2020 Jan; 20(1):485-490. PubMed ID: 31383197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The potential leaching and mobilization of trace elements from FGD-gypsum of a coal-fired power plant under water re-circulation conditions.
    Córdoba P; Castro I; Maroto-Valer M; Querol X
    J Environ Sci (China); 2015 Jun; 32():72-80. PubMed ID: 26040733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Potential Adherence of Flue Gas Desulfurization Gypsum to Forage as a Consideration for Excessive Ingestion by Ruminants.
    Torbert HA; Chaney RL; Watts DB
    J Environ Qual; 2017 Mar; 46(2):431-435. PubMed ID: 28380547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of hydroxyapatite derived from flue gas desulphurization gypsum on simultaneous immobilization of lead and cadmium in contaminated soil.
    Yan Y; Li Q; Yang J; Zhou S; Wang L; Bolan N
    J Hazard Mater; 2020 Dec; 400():123038. PubMed ID: 32947730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Application of flue gas desulfurization gypsum and its impact on wheat grain and soil chemistry.
    DeSutter TM; Cihacek LJ; Rahman S
    J Environ Qual; 2014 Jan; 43(1):303-11. PubMed ID: 25602564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comprehensive Effect of Oxidant Addition in an FGD Slurry on the Removal and Distribution of Selenium: A Field Study.
    Weng Q; Tian X; Wang H; Wu X; Wang S; Zhuo Y; Fan Y
    Environ Sci Technol; 2022 Mar; 56(6):3544-3551. PubMed ID: 35238541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Investigation of a mercury speciation technique for flue gas desulfurization materials.
    Lee JY; Cho K; Cheng L; Keener TC; Jegadeesan G; Al-Abed SR
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2009 Aug; 59(8):972-9. PubMed ID: 19728491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of potential for mercury volatilization from natural and FGD gypsum products using flux-chamber tests.
    Shock SS; Noggle JJ; Bloom N; Yost LJ
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Apr; 43(7):2282-7. PubMed ID: 19452875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A biological process for the reclamation of flue gas desulfurization gypsum using mixed sulfate-reducing bacteria with inexpensive carbon sources.
    Kaufman EN; Little MH; Selvaraj P
    Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 1997; 63-65():677-93. PubMed ID: 18576124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.