BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31180705)

  • 1. When is forewarned forearmed? Predicting auditory distraction in short-term memory.
    Hughes RW; Marsh JE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Mar; 46(3):427-442. PubMed ID: 31180705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Distraction by steady-state sounds: Evidence for a graded attentional model of auditory distraction.
    Bell R; Röer JP; Lang AG; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Apr; 45(4):500-512. PubMed ID: 30816785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Time of presentation affects auditory distraction: Changing-state and deviant sounds disrupt similar working memory processes.
    Körner U; Röer JP; Buchner A; Bell R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Mar; 72(3):457-471. PubMed ID: 29360013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory distraction does more than disrupt rehearsal processes in children's serial recall.
    AuBuchon AM; McGill CI; Elliott EM
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):738-748. PubMed ID: 30499097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The functional determinants of short-term memory: Evidence from perceptual-motor interference in verbal serial recall.
    Hughes RW; Marsh JE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Apr; 43(4):537-551. PubMed ID: 27668482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postcategorical auditory distraction in short-term memory: Insights from increased task load and task type.
    Marsh JE; Yang J; Qualter P; Richardson C; Perham N; Vachon F; Hughes RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Jun; 44(6):882-897. PubMed ID: 29389192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cognitive control of auditory distraction: impact of task difficulty, foreknowledge, and working memory capacity supports duplex-mechanism account.
    Hughes RW; Hurlstone MJ; Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):539-53. PubMed ID: 22731996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A semantic mismatch effect on serial recall: Evidence for interlexical processing of irrelevant speech.
    Röer JP; Bell R; Körner U; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):515-525. PubMed ID: 29985037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Emotional prosody of task-irrelevant speech interferes with the retention of serial order.
    Kattner F; Ellermeier W
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1303-1312. PubMed ID: 29629780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Disruption of short-term memory by changing and deviant sounds: support for a duplex-mechanism account of auditory distraction.
    Hughes RW; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Nov; 33(6):1050-61. PubMed ID: 17983312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Task-specific auditory distraction in serial recall and mental arithmetic.
    Kattner F; Hanl S; Paul L; Ellermeier W
    Mem Cognit; 2023 May; 51(4):930-951. PubMed ID: 36239898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Irrelevant speech impairs serial recall of verbal but not spatial items in children and adults.
    Leist L; Lachmann T; Schlittmeier SJ; Georgi M; Klatte M
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Feb; 51(2):307-320. PubMed ID: 36190658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional control and metacognitive monitoring of the effects of different types of task-irrelevant sound on serial recall.
    Kattner F; Bryce D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Feb; 48(2):139-158. PubMed ID: 34968110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is auditory distraction by changing-state and deviant sounds underpinned by the same mechanism? Evidence from pupillometry.
    Marois A; Marsh JE; Vachon F
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Feb; 141():64-74. PubMed ID: 30633950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ERP correlates of the irrelevant sound effect.
    Bell R; Dentale S; Buchner A; Mayr S
    Psychophysiology; 2010 Nov; 47(6):1182-91. PubMed ID: 20456662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reassessing the token set size effect on serial recall: Implications for theories of auditory distraction.
    Bell R; Röer JP; Lang AG; Buchner A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Aug; 45(8):1432-1440. PubMed ID: 30265053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of serial order short-term memory effects across verbal and musical domains.
    Gorin S; Mengal P; Majerus S
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Apr; 46(3):464-481. PubMed ID: 29274048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Equivalent auditory distraction in children and adults.
    Röer JP; Bell R; Körner U; Buchner A
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Aug; 172():41-58. PubMed ID: 29574236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age equivalence in auditory distraction by changing and deviant speech sounds.
    Röer JP; Bell R; Marsh JE; Buchner A
    Psychol Aging; 2015 Dec; 30(4):849-55. PubMed ID: 26523691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How the deployment of visual attention modulates auditory distraction.
    Marsh JE; Campbell TA; Vachon F; Taylor PJ; Hughes RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jan; 82(1):350-362. PubMed ID: 31290133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.