These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

257 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31180728)

  • 1. Moving Into the Loop: An Investigation of Drivers' Steering Behavior in Highly Automated Vehicles.
    Alsaid A; Lee JD; Price M
    Hum Factors; 2020 Jun; 62(4):671-683. PubMed ID: 31180728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing drivers' response during automated driver support system failures with non-driving tasks.
    Shen S; Neyens DM
    J Safety Res; 2017 Jun; 61():149-155. PubMed ID: 28454860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Driver response and recovery following automation initiated disengagement in real-world hands-free driving.
    Gershon P; Mehler B; Reimer B
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(4):356-361. PubMed ID: 36988583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of motor control requirements on drivers' eye-gaze pattern during automated driving.
    Goncalves RC; Louw TL; Quaresma M; Madigan R; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105788. PubMed ID: 33039820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of varying levels of vehicle automation on drivers' lane changing behaviour.
    Madigan R; Louw T; Merat N
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(2):e0192190. PubMed ID: 29466402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Driving Performance After Self-Regulated Control Transitions in Highly Automated Vehicles.
    Eriksson A; Stanton NA
    Hum Factors; 2017 Dec; 59(8):1233-1248. PubMed ID: 28902526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Keeping the driver in the loop through semi-automated or manual lane changes in conditionally automated driving.
    Dillmann J; den Hartigh RJR; Kurpiers CM; Pelzer J; Raisch FK; Cox RFA; de Waard D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Nov; 162():106397. PubMed ID: 34563644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Design and evaluation of cooperative human-machine interface for changing lanes in conditional driving automation.
    Muslim H; Kiu Leung C; Itoh M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106719. PubMed ID: 35660872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Keep Your Scanners Peeled: Gaze Behavior as a Measure of Automation Trust During Highly Automated Driving.
    Hergeth S; Lorenz L; Vilimek R; Krems JF
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):509-19. PubMed ID: 26843570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Understanding take-over performance of high crash risk drivers during conditionally automated driving.
    Lin Q; Li S; Ma X; Lu G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Aug; 143():105543. PubMed ID: 32485431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anticipatory Driving in Automated Vehicles: The Effects of Driving Experience and Distraction.
    He D; DeGuzman CA; Donmez B
    Hum Factors; 2023 Jun; 65(4):663. PubMed ID: 34348496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploring causes and effects of automated vehicle disengagement using statistical modeling and classification tree based on field test data.
    Wang S; Li Z
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():44-54. PubMed ID: 31103878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of scheduled manual driving on drowsiness and response to take over request: A simulator study towards understanding drivers in automated driving.
    Wu Y; Kihara K; Takeda Y; Sato T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Mar; 124():202-209. PubMed ID: 30665055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance.
    Naujoks F; Höfling S; Purucker C; Zeeb K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():28-42. PubMed ID: 30205284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing Drivers' Trust of Automated Vehicle Driving Styles With a Two-Part Mixed Model of Intervention Tendency and Magnitude.
    Lee JD; Liu SY; Domeyer J; DinparastDjadid A
    Hum Factors; 2021 Mar; 63(2):197-209. PubMed ID: 31596618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Challenges to Human Drivers in Increasingly Automated Vehicles.
    Hancock PA; Kajaks T; Caird JK; Chignell MH; Mizobuchi S; Burns PC; Feng J; Fernie GR; Lavallière M; Noy IY; Redelmeier DA; Vrkljan BH
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):310-328. PubMed ID: 32022583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Toward Computational Simulations of Behavior During Automated Driving Takeovers: A Review of the Empirical and Modeling Literatures.
    McDonald AD; Alambeigi H; Engström J; Markkula G; Vogelpohl T; Dunne J; Yuma N
    Hum Factors; 2019 Jun; 61(4):642-688. PubMed ID: 30830804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Drivers' gaze patterns when resuming control with a head-up-display: Effects of automation level and time budget.
    Xu C; Louw TL; Merat N; Li P; Hu M; Li Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Feb; 180():106905. PubMed ID: 36508949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Driver Vigilance in Automated Vehicles: Hazard Detection Failures Are a Matter of Time.
    Greenlee ET; DeLucia PR; Newton DC
    Hum Factors; 2018 Jun; 60(4):465-476. PubMed ID: 29513611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of inconsistent steering guidance during transitions from Highly Automated Driving.
    Maggi D; Romano R; Carsten O
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Mar; 167():106572. PubMed ID: 35121504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.