345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31181016)
1. In Degenerative Spondylolisthesis, Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression Leads to Less Reoperations at 5 Years When Compared to Posterior Decompression With Instrumented Fusion: A Propensity-matched Retrospective Analysis.
Kuo CC; Merchant M; Kardile MP; Yacob A; Majid K; Bains RS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Nov; 44(21):1530-1537. PubMed ID: 31181016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of lumbar endoscopic unilateral laminotomy bilateral decompression and minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for one-level lumbar spinal stenosis.
Hua W; Wang B; Ke W; Wu X; Zhang Y; Li S; Yang S; Yang C
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Nov; 21(1):785. PubMed ID: 33246434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Degenerative spondylolisthesis does not affect the outcome of unilateral laminotomy with bilateral decompression in patients with lumbar stenosis.
Chang HS; Fujisawa N; Tsuchiya T; Oya S; Matsui T
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):400-8. PubMed ID: 24365897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Should patients with lumbar stenosis and grade I spondylolisthesis be treated differently based on spinopelvic alignment? A retrospective, two-year, propensity matched, comparison of patient-reported outcome measures and clinical outcomes from multiple sites within a single health system.
Mohanty S; Barchick S; Kadiyala M; Lad M; Rouhi AD; Vadali C; Albayar A; Ozturk AK; Khalsa A; Saifi C; Casper DS
Spine J; 2023 Jan; 23(1):92-104. PubMed ID: 36064091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Associated With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Secondary Fusion Rates Following Open vs Minimally Invasive Decompression.
Schöller K; Alimi M; Cong GT; Christos P; Härtl R
Neurosurgery; 2017 Mar; 80(3):355-367. PubMed ID: 28362963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reoperation Rate After Microsurgical Uni- or Bilateral Laminotomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With and Without Low-grade Spondylolisthesis: What do Preoperative Radiographic Parameters Tell Us?
Schär RT; Kiebach S; Raabe A; Ulrich CT
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Feb; 44(4):E245-E251. PubMed ID: 30015718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of full-endoscopic and minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis in the setting of degenerative scoliosis and spondylolisthesis.
Hasan S; McGrath LB; Sen RD; Barber JK; Hofstetter CP
Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E16. PubMed ID: 31042656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of unilateral laminectomy with bilateral decompression and fusion surgery in the treatment of grade I lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Park JH; Hyun SJ; Roh SW; Rhim SC
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2012 Jul; 154(7):1205-12. PubMed ID: 22653494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reoperations after decompression with or without fusion for L4-5 spinal stenosis with or without degenerative spondylolisthesis: a study of 6,532 patients in Swespine, the national Swedish spine register.
Joelson A; Nerelius F; Holy M; Sigmundsson FG
Acta Orthop; 2021 Jun; 92(3):264-268. PubMed ID: 33506701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Provides Comparable Clinical Outcomes in Patients with and without Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.
Yoshikane K; Kikuchi K; Okazaki K
World Neurosurg; 2021 Jun; 150():e361-e371. PubMed ID: 33722714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Microendoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis With Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: The Influence of Spondylolisthesis Stage (Disc Height and Static and Dynamic Translation) on Clinical Outcomes.
Minamide A; Simpson AK; Okada M; Enyo Y; Nakagawa Y; Iwasaki H; Tsutsui S; Takami M; Nagata K; Hashizume H; Yukawa Y; Yamada H; Yoshida M
Clin Spine Surg; 2019 Feb; 32(1):E20-E26. PubMed ID: 30222618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laminectomy plus Fusion versus Laminectomy Alone for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
Ghogawala Z; Dziura J; Butler WE; Dai F; Terrin N; Magge SN; Coumans JV; Harrington JF; Amin-Hanjani S; Schwartz JS; Sonntag VK; Barker FG; Benzel EC
N Engl J Med; 2016 Apr; 374(15):1424-34. PubMed ID: 27074067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates.
Alimi M; Hofstetter CP; Pyo SY; Paulo D; Härtl R
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Apr; 22(4):339-52. PubMed ID: 25635635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Decompression and Coflex interlaminar stabilization compared with decompression and instrumented spinal fusion for spinal stenosis and low-grade degenerative spondylolisthesis: two-year results from the prospective, randomized, multicenter, Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption trial.
Davis RJ; Errico TJ; Bae H; Auerbach JD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(18):1529-39. PubMed ID: 23680830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Efficacy and Rehabilitation of Microscopic "Over the Top" for Bilateral Decompression in Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis: A Retrospective Study.
Lv B; Sun S; Wang H; Xiao L; Xu T; Ji P; Yuan J; Ding H; Xie J; Meng N; Zhang L; Hu M; Jiang Q; Wang L; Yao X
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():7174354. PubMed ID: 33490252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Can low-grade spondylolisthesis be effectively treated by either coflex interlaminar stabilization or laminectomy and posterior spinal fusion? Two-year clinical and radiographic results from the randomized, prospective, multicenter US investigational device exemption trial: clinical article.
Davis R; Auerbach JD; Bae H; Errico TJ
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Aug; 19(2):174-84. PubMed ID: 23725394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study.
Kim CH; Chung CK; Park CS; Choi B; Hahn S; Kim MJ; Lee KS; Park BJ
Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1230-7. PubMed ID: 24017959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
Overdevest GM; Jacobs W; Vleggeert-Lankamp C; Thomé C; Gunzburg R; Peul W
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; (3):CD010036. PubMed ID: 25760812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reoperation rate and risk factors of elective spinal surgery for degenerative spondylolisthesis: minimum 5-year follow-up.
Sato S; Yagi M; Machida M; Yasuda A; Konomi T; Miyake A; Fujiyoshi K; Kaneko S; Takemitsu M; Machida M; Yato Y; Asazuma T
Spine J; 2015 Jul; 15(7):1536-44. PubMed ID: 25681581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgery for spinal stenosis: long-term reoperation rates, health care cost, and impact of instrumentation.
Lad SP; Babu R; Ugiliweneza B; Patil CG; Boakye M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(12):978-87. PubMed ID: 24718058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
