307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31181064)
1. Predicting three-dimensional genome organization with chromatin states.
Qi Y; Zhang B
PLoS Comput Biol; 2019 Jun; 15(6):e1007024. PubMed ID: 31181064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simulation of different three-dimensional polymer models of interphase chromosomes compared to experiments-an evaluation and review framework of the 3D genome organization.
Knoch TA
Semin Cell Dev Biol; 2019 Jun; 90():19-42. PubMed ID: 30125668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional folding dynamics of the Xenopus tropicalis genome.
Niu L; Shen W; Shi Z; Tan Y; He N; Wan J; Sun J; Zhang Y; Huang Y; Wang W; Fang C; Li J; Zheng P; Cheung E; Chen Y; Li L; Hou C
Nat Genet; 2021 Jul; 53(7):1075-1087. PubMed ID: 34099928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computational Analysis of Hi-C Data.
Forcato M; Bicciato S
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2157():103-125. PubMed ID: 32820401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low Input Targeted Chromatin Capture (Low-T2C).
Boltsis I; Nowosad K; Brouwer RWW; Tylzanowski P; van IJcken WFJ; Huylebroeck D; Grosveld F; Kolovos P
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2351():165-179. PubMed ID: 34382189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictive polymer modeling reveals coupled fluctuations in chromosome conformation and transcription.
Giorgetti L; Galupa R; Nora EP; Piolot T; Lam F; Dekker J; Tiana G; Heard E
Cell; 2014 May; 157(4):950-63. PubMed ID: 24813616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MrTADFinder: A network modularity based approach to identify topologically associating domains in multiple resolutions.
Yan KK; Lou S; Gerstein M
PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 Jul; 13(7):e1005647. PubMed ID: 28742097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Understanding 3D Genome Organization and Its Effect on Transcriptional Gene Regulation Under Environmental Stress in Plant: A Chromatin Perspective.
Kumar S; Kaur S; Seem K; Kumar S; Mohapatra T
Front Cell Dev Biol; 2021; 9():774719. PubMed ID: 34957106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of 3D Chromatin Interactions Using Hi-C.
Hu G
Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2117():65-78. PubMed ID: 31960372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SpectralTAD: an R package for defining a hierarchy of topologically associated domains using spectral clustering.
Cresswell KG; Stansfield JC; Dozmorov MG
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Jul; 21(1):319. PubMed ID: 32689928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Structural Fluctuations of the Chromatin Fiber within Topologically Associating Domains.
Tiana G; Amitai A; Pollex T; Piolot T; Holcman D; Heard E; Giorgetti L
Biophys J; 2016 Mar; 110(6):1234-45. PubMed ID: 27028634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detecting hierarchical genome folding with network modularity.
Norton HK; Emerson DJ; Huang H; Kim J; Titus KR; Gu S; Bassett DS; Phillips-Cremins JE
Nat Methods; 2018 Feb; 15(2):119-122. PubMed ID: 29334377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis, Modeling, and Visualization of Chromosome Conformation Capture Experiments.
Di Stefano M; Castillo D; Serra F; Farabella I; Goodstadt MN; Marti-Renom MA
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2157():35-63. PubMed ID: 32820398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distinct polymer physics principles govern chromatin dynamics in mouse and Drosophila topological domains.
Ea V; Sexton T; Gostan T; Herviou L; Baudement MO; Zhang Y; Berlivet S; Le Lay-Taha MN; Cathala G; Lesne A; Victor JM; Fan Y; Cavalli G; Forné T
BMC Genomics; 2015 Aug; 16(1):607. PubMed ID: 26271925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spatial organization of chromatin domains and compartments in single chromosomes.
Wang S; Su JH; Beliveau BJ; Bintu B; Moffitt JR; Wu CT; Zhuang X
Science; 2016 Aug; 353(6299):598-602. PubMed ID: 27445307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Topologically associating domains are stable units of replication-timing regulation.
Pope BD; Ryba T; Dileep V; Yue F; Wu W; Denas O; Vera DL; Wang Y; Hansen RS; Canfield TK; Thurman RE; Cheng Y; Gülsoy G; Dennis JH; Snyder MP; Stamatoyannopoulos JA; Taylor J; Hardison RC; Kahveci T; Ren B; Gilbert DM
Nature; 2014 Nov; 515(7527):402-5. PubMed ID: 25409831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian inference of chromatin structure ensembles from population-averaged contact data.
Carstens S; Nilges M; Habeck M
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Apr; 117(14):7824-7830. PubMed ID: 32193349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Chromatin-driven behavior of topologically associating domains.
Ciabrelli F; Cavalli G
J Mol Biol; 2015 Feb; 427(3):608-25. PubMed ID: 25280896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Joint annotation of chromatin state and chromatin conformation reveals relationships among domain types and identifies domains of cell-type-specific expression.
Libbrecht MW; Ay F; Hoffman MM; Gilbert DM; Bilmes JA; Noble WS
Genome Res; 2015 Apr; 25(4):544-57. PubMed ID: 25677182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contribution of transposable elements and distal enhancers to evolution of human-specific features of interphase chromatin architecture in embryonic stem cells.
Glinsky GV
Chromosome Res; 2018 Mar; 26(1-2):61-84. PubMed ID: 29335803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
