These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31181299)

  • 21. Face configuration affects speech perception: Evidence from a McGurk mismatch negativity study.
    Eskelund K; MacDonald EN; Andersen TS
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jan; 66():48-54. PubMed ID: 25447378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Audiovisual integration as conflict resolution: The conflict of the McGurk illusion.
    Morís Fernández L; Macaluso E; Soto-Faraco S
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2017 Nov; 38(11):5691-5705. PubMed ID: 28792094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Processing of audiovisually congruent and incongruent speech in school-age children with a history of specific language impairment: a behavioral and event-related potentials study.
    Kaganovich N; Schumaker J; Macias D; Gustafson D
    Dev Sci; 2015 Sep; 18(5):751-70. PubMed ID: 25440407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Electrophysiological Indexes of Incongruent Audiovisual Phonemic Processing: Unraveling the McGurk Effect.
    Proverbio AM; Raso G; Zani A
    Neuroscience; 2018 Aug; 385():215-226. PubMed ID: 29932985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On the variability of the McGurk effect: audiovisual integration depends on prestimulus brain states.
    Keil J; Müller N; Ihssen N; Weisz N
    Cereb Cortex; 2012 Jan; 22(1):221-31. PubMed ID: 21625011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How prior expectations shape multisensory perception.
    Gau R; Noppeney U
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):876-886. PubMed ID: 26419391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Seeing voices: High-density electrical mapping and source-analysis of the multisensory mismatch negativity evoked during the McGurk illusion.
    Saint-Amour D; De Sanctis P; Molholm S; Ritter W; Foxe JJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):587-97. PubMed ID: 16757004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. McGurk illusion recalibrates subsequent auditory perception.
    Lüttke CS; Ekman M; van Gerven MA; de Lange FP
    Sci Rep; 2016 Sep; 6():32891. PubMed ID: 27611960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Neural Correlates of Enhanced Audiovisual Processing in the Bilingual Brain.
    Bidelman GM; Heath ST
    Neuroscience; 2019 Mar; 401():11-20. PubMed ID: 30639306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A link between individual differences in multisensory speech perception and eye movements.
    Gurler D; Doyle N; Walker E; Magnotti J; Beauchamp M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1333-41. PubMed ID: 25810157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The McGurk Illusion: A Default Mechanism of the Auditory System.
    Iqbal ZJ; Shahin AJ; Bortfeld H; Backer KC
    Brain Sci; 2023 Mar; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 36979322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Single trial prestimulus oscillations predict perception of the sound-induced flash illusion.
    Kaiser M; Senkowski D; Busch NA; Balz J; Keil J
    Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):5983. PubMed ID: 30979927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Skilled musicians are not subject to the McGurk effect.
    Proverbio AM; Massetti G; Rizzi E; Zani A
    Sci Rep; 2016 Jul; 6():30423. PubMed ID: 27453363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Alpha-Band Oscillations Reflect Altered Multisensory Processing of the McGurk Illusion in Schizophrenia.
    Roa Romero Y; Keil J; Balz J; Niedeggen M; Gallinat J; Senkowski D
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():41. PubMed ID: 26903845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Tuning and disrupting the brain-modulating the McGurk illusion with electrical stimulation.
    Marques LM; Lapenta OM; Merabet LB; Bolognini N; Boggio PS
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2014; 8():533. PubMed ID: 25140136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Seeing is believing: neural representations of visual stimuli in human auditory cortex correlate with illusory auditory perceptions.
    Smith E; Duede S; Hanrahan S; Davis T; House P; Greger B
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e73148. PubMed ID: 24023823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Variability and stability in the McGurk effect: contributions of participants, stimuli, time, and response type.
    Mallick DB; Magnotti JF; Beauchamp MS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1299-307. PubMed ID: 25802068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The Impact of Singing on Visual and Multisensory Speech Perception in Children on the Autism Spectrum.
    Feldman JI; Tu A; Conrad JG; Kuang W; Santapuram P; Woynaroski TG
    Multisens Res; 2022 Dec; 36(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 36731528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A neurocomputational analysis of the sound-induced flash illusion.
    Cuppini C; Magosso E; Bolognini N; Vallar G; Ursino M
    Neuroimage; 2014 May; 92():248-66. PubMed ID: 24518261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Audiovisual sentence recognition not predicted by susceptibility to the McGurk effect.
    Van Engen KJ; Xie Z; Chandrasekaran B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):396-403. PubMed ID: 27921268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.