188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31181857)
1. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transthoracic Echocardiography: Investigation of Concordance between the Two Methods for Measurement of the Cardiac Chamber.
Gürdoğan M; Ustabaşıoğlu FE; Kula O; Korkmaz S
Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Jun; 55(6):. PubMed ID: 31181857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Myocardial Dimensions in Children With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Comparison Between Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Windram JD; Dragelescu A; Benson L; Forsey J; Shariat M; Yoo SJ; Mertens L; Wong D; Grosse-Wortmann L
Can J Cardiol; 2016 Dec; 32(12):1507-1512. PubMed ID: 27789109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative assessment of primary mitral regurgitation using left ventricular volumes obtained with new automated three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic software: A comparison with 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance.
Levy F; Marechaux S; Iacuzio L; Schouver ED; Castel AL; Toledano M; Rusek S; Dor V; Tribouilloy C; Dreyfus G
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2018; 111(8-9):507-517. PubMed ID: 29610031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Left ventricular chamber dimensions and wall thickness by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography.
Puntmann VO; Gebker R; Duckett S; Mirelis J; Schnackenburg B; Graefe M; Razavi R; Fleck E; Nagel E
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Mar; 14(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 22815376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transthoracic 3D Echocardiographic Left Heart Chamber Quantification Using an Automated Adaptive Analytics Algorithm.
Tsang W; Salgo IS; Medvedofsky D; Takeuchi M; Prater D; Weinert L; Yamat M; Mor-Avi V; Patel AR; Lang RM
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 9(7):769-782. PubMed ID: 27318718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of left atrial volume and function in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation: comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, 320-slice multi-detector computed tomography, and transthoracic echocardiography.
Agner BF; Kühl JT; Linde JJ; Kofoed KF; Åkeson P; Rasmussen BV; Jensen GB; Dixen U
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 May; 15(5):532-40. PubMed ID: 24247925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Agreement of 2D transthoracic echocardiography with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging after ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Hendriks T; Al Ali L; Maagdenberg CG; van Melle JP; Hummel YM; Oudkerk M; van Veldhuisen DJ; Nijveldt R; van der Horst ICC; Lipsic E; van der Harst P
Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():6-13. PubMed ID: 31005178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Value of echocardiography using knowledge-based reconstruction in determining right ventricular volumes in pulmonary sarcoidosis: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Mathijssen H; Huitema MP; Bakker ALM; Akdim F; van Es HW; Grutters JC; Post MC
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2022 Feb; 38(2):309-316. PubMed ID: 34586530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective comparison of valve regurgitation quantitation by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography.
Cawley PJ; Hamilton-Craig C; Owens DS; Krieger EV; Strugnell WE; Mitsumori L; D'Jang CL; Schwaegler RG; Nguyen KQ; Nguyen B; Maki JH; Otto CM
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 6(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 23212272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of new automated transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiographic software for left ventricular volumes and function assessment in routine clinical practice: Comparison with 3 Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance.
Levy F; Dan Schouver E; Iacuzio L; Civaia F; Rusek S; Dommerc C; Marechaux S; Dor V; Tribouilloy C; Dreyfus G
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2017 Nov; 110(11):580-589. PubMed ID: 28566200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography.
Jabbour A; Ismail TF; Moat N; Gulati A; Roussin I; Alpendurada F; Park B; Okoroafor F; Asgar A; Barker S; Davies S; Prasad SK; Rubens M; Mohiaddin RH
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 58(21):2165-73. PubMed ID: 22078422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative assessment of two- and three-dimensional transthoracic and two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in normal canine hearts.
Fries RC; Gordon SG; Saunders AB; Miller MW; Hariu CD; Schaeffer DJ
J Vet Cardiol; 2019 Feb; 21():79-92. PubMed ID: 30797448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of cine cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography derived diameters of the aortic root in a large population-based cohort.
Wenzel JP; Nikorowitsch J; Bei der Kellen R; Dohm L; Girdauskas E; Lund G; Bannas P; Blankenberg S; Kölbel T; Cavus E; Müllerleile K; Kaul MG; Adam G; Weinrich JM
Sci Rep; 2022 Sep; 12(1):15307. PubMed ID: 36096919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ascending aortic diameters in congenital aortic stenosis: cardiac magnetic resonance versus transthoracic echocardiography.
van der Linde D; Rossi A; Yap SC; McGhie JS; van den Bosch AE; Kirschbaum SW; Russo B; van Dijk AP; Moelker A; Krestin GP; van Geuns RJ; Roos-Hesselink JW
Echocardiography; 2013 May; 30(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 23305528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Right ventricular outflow tract dimensions in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia-a multicentre study comparing echocardiography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Gotschy A; Saguner AM; Niemann M; Hamada S; Akdis D; Yoon JN; Parmon EV; Delgado V; Bax JJ; Kozerke S; Brunckhorst C; Duru F; Tanner FC; Manka R
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 May; 19(5):516-523. PubMed ID: 28575228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cardiac magnetic resonance, transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography: a comparison of in vivo assessment of ventricular function in rats.
Richardson JD; Bertaso AG; Frost L; Psaltis PJ; Carbone A; Koschade B; Wong DT; Nelson AJ; Paton S; Williams K; Azarisman S; Worthley MI; Teo KS; Gronthos S; Zannettino AC; Worthley SG
Lab Anim; 2013 Oct; 47(4):291-300. PubMed ID: 23836849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Evaluation of the clinical suitability of automated left ventricle's fraction and volume measurements in 3-dimensional echocardiography compared to values obtained in magnetic resonance imaging (pilot study)].
Żygadło A; Kaźnica-Wiatr M; Błaut-Jurkowska J; Knap K; Lenart-Migdalska A; Smaś-Suska M; Skubera M; Urbańczyk-Zawadzka M; Podolec P; Olszowska M
Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2017 Oct; 43(256):154-157. PubMed ID: 29084187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multimodality imaging assessment of mitral annular disjunction in mitral valve prolapse.
Mantegazza V; Volpato V; Gripari P; Ghulam Ali S; Fusini L; Italiano G; Muratori M; Pontone G; Tamborini G; Pepi M
Heart; 2021 Jan; 107(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 32723759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Post-operative Assessment of the Arterial Switch Operation: A Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Echocardiography.
Broda CR; Shugh SB; Parikh RB; Wang Y; Schlingmann TR; Noel CV
Pediatr Cardiol; 2018 Jun; 39(5):1036-1041. PubMed ID: 29564521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of left and right atrial volume by echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using the area-length method.
Whitlock M; Garg A; Gelow J; Jacobson T; Broberg C
Am J Cardiol; 2010 Nov; 106(9):1345-50. PubMed ID: 21029836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
