230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31182354)
1. Cytometric assessment of uterine receptivity via epithelial β3 integrin expression.
Marron K; Harrity C; Dunne H; Shkrobot L; Kennedy J
Reprod Biomed Online; 2019 Aug; 39(2):294-303. PubMed ID: 31182354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endometrial beta3 integrin profile reflects endometrial receptivity defects in women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.
Germeyer A; Savaris RF; Jauckus J; Lessey B
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2014 Jun; 12():53. PubMed ID: 24950982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Administration of calcitonin promotes blastocyst implantation in mice by up-regulating integrin β3 expression in endometrial epithelial cells.
Xiong T; Zhao Y; Hu D; Meng J; Wang R; Yang X; Ai J; Qian K; Zhang H
Hum Reprod; 2012 Dec; 27(12):3540-51. PubMed ID: 23001774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony.
Shapiro BS; Daneshmand ST; Garner FC; Aguirre M; Ross R
Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17224151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endometrial integrin expression in women with recurrent implantation failure after in vitro fertilization and its relationship to pregnancy outcome.
Coughlan C; Sinagra M; Ledger W; Li TC; Laird S
Fertil Steril; 2013 Sep; 100(3):825-30. PubMed ID: 23755950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integrins β1 and β3 are biomarkers of uterine condition for embryo transfer.
Chen G; Xin A; Liu Y; Shi C; Chen J; Tang X; Chen Y; Yu M; Peng X; Li L; Sun X
J Transl Med; 2016 Oct; 14(1):303. PubMed ID: 27782833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Single and double endometrial scratching (ES) in infertile women with strict criteria of recurrent implantation failure (RIF).
Tumanyan A; Gemilyan M; Hambartsoumian E
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2019; 35(sup1):11-14. PubMed ID: 31532321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evidence for a detrimental effect on uterine receptivity of high serum oestradiol concentrations in high and normal responder patients.
Simón C; Cano F; Valbuena D; Remohí J; Pellicer A
Hum Reprod; 1995 Sep; 10(9):2432-7. PubMed ID: 8530680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Decreased MUC1 in endometrium is an independent receptivity marker in recurrent implantation failure during implantation window.
Wu F; Chen X; Liu Y; Liang B; Xu H; Li TC; Wang CC
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2018 Jun; 16(1):60. PubMed ID: 29929546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Subendometrial resistence and pulsatility index assessment of endometrial receptivity in assisted reproductive technology cycles.
Silva Martins R; Helio Oliani A; Vaz Oliani D; Martinez de Oliveira J
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2019 Aug; 17(1):62. PubMed ID: 31375113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective assessment of midsecretory endometrial leukemia inhibitor factor expression versus ανβ3 testing in women with unexplained infertility.
Franasiak JM; Holoch KJ; Yuan L; Schammel DP; Young SL; Lessey BA
Fertil Steril; 2014 Jun; 101(6):1724-31. PubMed ID: 24690239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Expression of H19 imprinted gene in patients with repeated implantation failure during the window of implantation.
Zeng H; Fan X; Liu N
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Oct; 296(4):835-839. PubMed ID: 28791461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Human Oocyte Preservation Experience (HOPE) Registry: evaluation of cryopreservation techniques and oocyte source on outcomes.
Nagy ZP; Anderson RE; Feinberg EC; Hayward B; Mahony MC
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2017 Feb; 15(1):10. PubMed ID: 28173814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endometrial Receptivity Analysis - a tool to increase an implantation rate in assisted reproduction.
Hromadová L; Tokareva I; Veselá K; Trávník P; Veselý J
Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(3):177-183. PubMed ID: 31324106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Metabolomics for improving pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing assisted reproductive technologies.
Siristatidis CS; Sertedaki E; Vaidakis D
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 May; 5(5):CD011872. PubMed ID: 28534597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endometrial progesterone receptors and markers of uterine receptivity in the window of implantation.
Lessey BA; Yeh I; Castelbaum AJ; Fritz MA; Ilesanmi AO; Korzeniowski P; Sun J; Chwalisz K
Fertil Steril; 1996 Mar; 65(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 8774273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.
Crawford S; Boulet SL; Kawwass JF; Jamieson DJ; Kissin DM
Fertil Steril; 2017 Jan; 107(1):110-118. PubMed ID: 27842997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. GnRH agonist administration prior to embryo transfer in freeze-all cycles of patients with endometriosis or aberrant endometrial integrin expression.
Surrey ES; Katz-Jaffe M; Kondapalli LV; Gustofson RL; Schoolcraft WB
Reprod Biomed Online; 2017 Aug; 35(2):145-151. PubMed ID: 28601378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of local endometrial injury in proliferative vs. luteal phase on IVF outcomes in unselected subfertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization.
Liu W; Tal R; Chao H; Liu M; Liu Y
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2017 Sep; 15(1):75. PubMed ID: 28938896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endometrial preparation: effect of estrogen dose and administration route on reproductive outcomes in oocyte donation cycles with fresh embryo transfer.
Madero S; Rodriguez A; Vassena R; Vernaeve V
Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1755-64. PubMed ID: 27141040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
