110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31183411)
1. The calibrated model-based concordance improved assessment of discriminative ability in patient clusters of limited sample size.
van Klaveren D; Steyerberg EW; Gönen M; Vergouwe Y
Diagn Progn Res; 2019; 3():11. PubMed ID: 31183411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessing discriminative ability of risk models in clustered data.
van Klaveren D; Steyerberg EW; Perel P; Vergouwe Y
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Jan; 14():5. PubMed ID: 24423445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new concordance measure for risk prediction models in external validation settings.
van Klaveren D; Gönen M; Steyerberg EW; Vergouwe Y
Stat Med; 2016 Oct; 35(23):4136-52. PubMed ID: 27251001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does the SORG Algorithm Predict 5-year Survival in Patients with Chondrosarcoma? An External Validation.
Bongers MER; Thio QCBS; Karhade AV; Stor ML; Raskin KA; Lozano Calderon SA; DeLaney TF; Ferrone ML; Schwab JH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Oct; 477(10):2296-2303. PubMed ID: 31107338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prediction of Global Functional Outcome and Post-Concussive Symptoms after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: External Validation of Prognostic Models in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) Study.
Mikolić A; Polinder S; Steyerberg EW; Retel Helmrich IRA; Giacino JT; Maas AIR; van der Naalt J; Voormolen DC; von Steinbüchel N; Wilson L; Lingsma HF; van Klaveren D;
J Neurotrauma; 2021 Jan; 38(2):196-209. PubMed ID: 32977737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prediction models for clustered data: comparison of a random intercept and standard regression model.
Bouwmeester W; Twisk JW; Kappen TH; van Klei WA; Moons KG; Vergouwe Y
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Feb; 13():19. PubMed ID: 23414436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome Prediction after Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: External Validation of Two Established Prognostic Models in 1742 European Patients.
Dijkland SA; Helmrich IRAR; Nieboer D; van der Jagt M; Dippel DWJ; Menon DK; Stocchetti N; Maas AIR; Lingsma HF; Steyerberg EW;
J Neurotrauma; 2021 May; 38(10):1377-1388. PubMed ID: 33161840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Internal validation of risk models in clustered data: a comparison of bootstrap schemes.
Bouwmeester W; Moons KG; Kappen TH; van Klei WA; Twisk JW; Eijkemans MJ; Vergouwe Y
Am J Epidemiol; 2013 Jun; 177(11):1209-17. PubMed ID: 23660796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of the CRASH model in the prediction of 18-month mortality and unfavorable outcome in severe traumatic brain injury requiring decompressive craniectomy.
Honeybul S; Ho KM; Lind CR; Gillett GR
J Neurosurg; 2014 May; 120(5):1131-7. PubMed ID: 24605836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Redevelopment and validation of the SYNTAX score II to individualise decision making between percutaneous and surgical revascularisation in patients with complex coronary artery disease: secondary analysis of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAXES trial with external cohort validation.
Takahashi K; Serruys PW; Fuster V; Farkouh ME; Spertus JA; Cohen DJ; Park SJ; Park DW; Ahn JM; Kappetein AP; Head SJ; Thuijs DJ; Onuma Y; Kent DM; Steyerberg EW; van Klaveren D;
Lancet; 2020 Oct; 396(10260):1399-1412. PubMed ID: 33038944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and validation of Prediction models for Risks of complications in Early-onset Pre-eclampsia (PREP): a prospective cohort study.
Thangaratinam S; Allotey J; Marlin N; Mol BW; Von Dadelszen P; Ganzevoort W; Akkermans J; Ahmed A; Daniels J; Deeks J; Ismail K; Barnard AM; Dodds J; Kerry S; Moons C; Riley RD; Khan KS
Health Technol Assess; 2017 Apr; 21(18):1-100. PubMed ID: 28412995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of outcome after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: external validation of the International Mission on Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials (IMPACT) and Corticoid Randomisation After Significant Head injury (CRASH) prognostic models.
Roozenbeek B; Lingsma HF; Lecky FE; Lu J; Weir J; Butcher I; McHugh GS; Murray GD; Perel P; Maas AI; Steyerberg EW; ; ;
Crit Care Med; 2012 May; 40(5):1609-17. PubMed ID: 22511138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing the discriminative ability of risk models for more than two outcome categories.
Van Calster B; Vergouwe Y; Looman CW; Van Belle V; Timmerman D; Steyerberg EW
Eur J Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 27(10):761-70. PubMed ID: 23054032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicting in-hospital mortality after traumatic brain injury: External validation of CRASH-basic and IMPACT-core in the national trauma data bank.
Camarano JG; Ratliff HT; Korst GS; Hrushka JM; Jupiter DC
Injury; 2021 Feb; 52(2):147-153. PubMed ID: 33070947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prognostic models for identifying risk of poor outcome in people with acute ankle sprains: the SPRAINED development and external validation study.
Keene DJ; Schlüssel MM; Thompson J; Hagan DA; Williams MA; Byrne C; Goodacre S; Cooke M; Gwilym S; Hormbrey P; Bostock J; Haywood K; Wilson D; Collins GS; Lamb SE
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Nov; 22(64):1-112. PubMed ID: 30474592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. External validation of the CRASH and IMPACT prognostic models in severe traumatic brain injury.
Han J; King NK; Neilson SJ; Gandhi MP; Ng I
J Neurotrauma; 2014 Jul; 31(13):1146-52. PubMed ID: 24568201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk prediction in multicentre studies when there is confounding by cluster or informative cluster size.
Pavlou M; Ambler G; Omar RZ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Jul; 21(1):135. PubMed ID: 34218793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating dynamic and predictive discrimination for recurrent event models: use of a time-dependent C-index.
Wang J; Jiang X; Ning J
Biostatistics; 2023 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 37952117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discrimination slope and integrated discrimination improvement - properties, relationships and impact of calibration.
Pencina MJ; Fine JP; D'Agostino RB
Stat Med; 2017 Dec; 36(28):4482-4490. PubMed ID: 27699818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A simulation study for evaluating the performance of clustering measures in multilevel logistic regression.
Adam NS; Twabi HS; Manda SOM
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):245. PubMed ID: 34772354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
