These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31183898)

  • 1. Using metapopulation theory for practical conservation of mangrove endemic birds.
    Huang R; Pimm SL; Giri C
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Feb; 34(1):266-275. PubMed ID: 31183898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How individual links affect network stability in a large-scale, heterogeneous metacommunity.
    Brodie JF; Mohd-Azlan J; Schnell JK
    Ecology; 2016 Jul; 97(7):1658-1667. PubMed ID: 27859156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Enhancing the area-isolation paradigm: habitat heterogeneity and metapopulation dynamics of a rare wetland mammal.
    Schooley RL; Branch LC
    Ecol Appl; 2009 Oct; 19(7):1708-22. PubMed ID: 19831065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Setting practical conservation priorities for birds in the Western Andes of Colombia.
    Ocampo-Peñuela N; Pimm SL
    Conserv Biol; 2014 Oct; 28(5):1260-70. PubMed ID: 25065287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimum viable metapopulation size, extinction debt, and the conservation of a declining species.
    Bulman CR; Wilson RJ; Holt AR; Gálvez Bravo L; Early RI; Warren MS; Thomas CD
    Ecol Appl; 2007 Jul; 17(5):1460-73. PubMed ID: 17708221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating extinction risk with metapopulation models of large-scale fragmentation.
    Schnell JK; Harris GM; Pimm SL; Russell GJ
    Conserv Biol; 2013 Jun; 27(3):520-30. PubMed ID: 23551595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Applications of Rapid Evaluation of Metapopulation Persistence (REMP) in Conservation Planning for Vulnerable Fauna Species.
    Taylor S; Drielsma M; Taylor R; Kumar L
    Environ Manage; 2016 Jun; 57(6):1281-91. PubMed ID: 26902481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Metapopulation persistence can be inferred from incomplete surveys.
    Song C; Fortin MJ; Gonzalez A
    Proc Biol Sci; 2022 Dec; 289(1989):20222029. PubMed ID: 36515114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape.
    Hanski I; Ovaskainen O
    Nature; 2000 Apr; 404(6779):755-8. PubMed ID: 10783887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How Do Landscape Structure, Management and Habitat Quality Drive the Colonization of Habitat Patches by the Dryad Butterfly (Lepidoptera: Satyrinae) in Fragmented Grassland?
    Kalarus K; Nowicki P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138557. PubMed ID: 26375036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lemur species-specific metapopulation responses to habitat loss and fragmentation.
    Steffens TS; Lehman SM
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0195791. PubMed ID: 29742108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Landscape fragmentation overturns classical metapopulation thinking.
    Tao Y; Hastings A; Lafferty KD; Hanski I; Ovaskainen O
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 May; 121(20):e2303846121. PubMed ID: 38709920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bird-community responses to habitat creation in a long-term, large-scale natural experiment.
    Whytock RC; Fuentes-Montemayor E; Watts K; Barbosa De Andrade P; Whytock RT; French P; Macgregor NA; Park KJ
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Apr; 32(2):345-354. PubMed ID: 28685859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metapopulation dynamics on ephemeral patches.
    Reigada C; Schreiber SJ; Altermatt F; Holyoak M
    Am Nat; 2015 Feb; 185(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 25616138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Increasing connectivity between metapopulation ecology and landscape ecology.
    Howell PE; Muths E; Hossack BR; Sigafus BH; Chandler RB
    Ecology; 2018 May; 99(5):1119-1128. PubMed ID: 29453767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Metapopulation persistence in a dynamic landscape: more habitat or better stewardship?
    Ross JV; Sirl DJ; Pollett PK; Possingham HP
    Ecol Appl; 2008 Apr; 18(3):590-8. PubMed ID: 18488619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Metapopulation persistence in random fragmented landscapes.
    Grilli J; Barabás G; Allesina S
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 May; 11(5):e1004251. PubMed ID: 25993004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Metapopulation capacity determines food chain length in fragmented landscapes.
    Wang S; Brose U; van Nouhuys S; Holt RD; Loreau M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Aug; 118(34):. PubMed ID: 34417316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantifying resistance and resilience to local extinction for conservation prioritization.
    Donaldson L; Bennie JJ; Wilson RJ; Maclean IMD
    Ecol Appl; 2019 Dec; 29(8):e01989. PubMed ID: 31376197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Immigration rates in fragmented landscapes--empirical evidence for the importance of habitat amount for species persistence.
    Püttker T; Bueno AA; Dos Santos de Barros C; Sommer S; Pardini R
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e27963. PubMed ID: 22125643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.