192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31183899)
1. Prostate cancer meeting the Japanese active surveillance criteria and diagnosed by community-based prostate-specific antigen screening: A 21-year follow-up study.
Hongo F; Okihara K; Kitamura K; Fujihara A; Yamada Y; Shiraishi T; Konishi E; Ukimura O
Int J Urol; 2019 Aug; 26(8):827-832. PubMed ID: 31183899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation and Active Treatment versus Active Surveillance of Localized Prostate Cancer in Renal Transplant Patients in the Era of Low and Very Low Risk Prostate Cancer.
Aminsharifi A; Simon R; Polascik TJ; Robertson CN; Sudan DL; Collins BH; Moul JW
J Urol; 2019 Sep; 202(3):469-474. PubMed ID: 30835631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Long-Term Risks of Metastases in Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
Maggi M; Cowan JE; Fasulo V; Washington SL; Lonergan PE; Sciarra A; Nguyen HG; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1222-1228. PubMed ID: 33157570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcome following active surveillance of men with screen-detected prostate cancer. Results from the Göteborg randomised population-based prostate cancer screening trial.
Godtman RA; Holmberg E; Khatami A; Stranne J; Hugosson J
Eur Urol; 2013 Jan; 63(1):101-7. PubMed ID: 22980443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk Factors for Biopsy Reclassification over Time in Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
Lonergan PE; Washington SL; Cowan JE; Zhao S; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1216-1221. PubMed ID: 32519915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Clinical Significance of Multiple Negative Surveillance Prostate Biopsies for Men on Active Surveillance-Does Cancer Vanish or Simply Hide?
Chu CE; Cowan JE; Fasulo V; Washington SL; de la Calle C; Shoemaker J; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2021 Jan; 205(1):109-114. PubMed ID: 33198555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Association of Periprostatic Fat and Grade Group Progression in Men with Localized Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.
Gregg JR; Surasi DS; Childs A; Moll N; Ward JF; Kim J; Daniel CR; Logothetis C; Bathala T; Davis JW
J Urol; 2021 Jan; 205(1):122-128. PubMed ID: 32718204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Factors Associated with Time to Conversion from Active Surveillance to Treatment for Prostate Cancer in a Multi-Institutional Cohort.
Cooley LF; Emeka AA; Meyers TJ; Cooper PR; Lin DW; Finelli A; Eastham JA; Logothetis CJ; Marks LS; Vesprini D; Goldenberg SL; Higano CS; Pavlovich CP; Chan JM; Morgan TM; Klein EA; Barocas DA; Loeb S; Helfand BT; Scholtens DM; Witte JS; Catalona WJ;
J Urol; 2021 Nov; 206(5):1147-1156. PubMed ID: 34503355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of Biopsy Compliance on Outcomes for Patients on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.
Detsky JS; Ghiam AF; Mamedov A; Commisso K; Commisso A; Zhang L; Liu S; Klotz L; Loblaw A; Vesprini D
J Urol; 2020 Nov; 204(5):934-940. PubMed ID: 32330406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Upgrading and upstaging at radical prostatectomy in the post-prostate-specific antigen screening era: an effect of delayed diagnosis or a shift in patient selection?
Edmund L; Rotker KL; Lakis NS; Brito JM; Lepe M; Lombardo KA; Renzulli JF; Matoso A
Hum Pathol; 2017 Jan; 59():87-93. PubMed ID: 27720731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is there any association between prostate-specific antigen screening frequency and uptake of active surveillance in men with low or very low risk prostate cancer?
Beckmann K; Kinsella N; Olsson H; Wallerstedt Lantz A; Nordstrom T; Aly M; Adolfsson J; Eklund M; Van Hemelrijck M
BMC Urol; 2019 Aug; 19(1):73. PubMed ID: 31383015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Active Surveillance for Men with Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer.
Agrawal V; Ma X; Hu JC; Barbieri CE; Nagar H
J Urol; 2021 Jan; 205(1):115-121. PubMed ID: 32658588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.
Mottet N; Bellmunt J; Bolla M; Briers E; Cumberbatch MG; De Santis M; Fossati N; Gross T; Henry AM; Joniau S; Lam TB; Mason MD; Matveev VB; Moldovan PC; van den Bergh RCN; Van den Broeck T; van der Poel HG; van der Kwast TH; Rouvière O; Schoots IG; Wiegel T; Cornford P
Eur Urol; 2017 Apr; 71(4):618-629. PubMed ID: 27568654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Active Surveillance: Pathologic and Clinical Variables Associated with Outcome.
Pomerantz M
Surg Pathol Clin; 2015 Dec; 8(4):581-5. PubMed ID: 26612216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Decade of Active Surveillance in the PRIAS Study: An Update and Evaluation of the Criteria Used to Recommend a Switch to Active Treatment.
Bokhorst LP; Valdagni R; Rannikko A; Kakehi Y; Pickles T; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ;
Eur Urol; 2016 Dec; 70(6):954-960. PubMed ID: 27329565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A biopsy-integrated algorithm for determining Gleason 6 upgrading risk stratifies risk of active surveillance failure in prostate cancer.
Blute ML; Shiau JM; Truong M; Shi F; Abel EJ; Downs TM; Jarrard DF
World J Urol; 2017 May; 35(5):729-735. PubMed ID: 27631325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uptake of Active Surveillance for Very-Low-Risk Prostate Cancer in Sweden.
Loeb S; Folkvaljon Y; Curnyn C; Robinson D; Bratt O; Stattin P
JAMA Oncol; 2017 Oct; 3(10):1393-1398. PubMed ID: 27768168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term Results of Active Surveillance in the Göteborg Randomized, Population-based Prostate Cancer Screening Trial.
Godtman RA; Holmberg E; Khatami A; Pihl CG; Stranne J; Hugosson J
Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):760-766. PubMed ID: 27090975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utilization of Active Surveillance and Watchful Waiting for localized prostate cancer in the daily practice.
Herden J; Weissbach L
World J Urol; 2018 Mar; 36(3):383-391. PubMed ID: 29330583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An evidence review of active surveillance in men with localized prostate cancer.
Ip S; Dahabreh IJ; Chung M; Yu WW; Balk EM; Iovin RC; Mathew P; Luongo T; Dvorak T; Lau J
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep); 2011 Dec; (204):1-341. PubMed ID: 23126653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
