These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31184783)

  • 1. Adaptive group-sequential design with population enrichment in phase 3 randomized controlled trials with two binary co-primary endpoints.
    Sinha AK; Moye L; Piller LB; Yamal JM; Barcenas CH; Lin J; Davis BR
    Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(21):3985-3996. PubMed ID: 31184783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interim futility analysis with intermediate endpoints.
    Goldman B; LeBlanc M; Crowley J
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 18283075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A varying-stage adaptive phase II/III clinical trial design.
    Dong G
    Stat Med; 2014 Apr; 33(8):1272-87. PubMed ID: 24273128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A modified varying-stage adaptive phase II/III clinical trial design.
    Dong G; Vandemeulebroecke M
    Pharm Stat; 2016 Jul; 15(4):368-78. PubMed ID: 27264007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interim evaluation of efficacy or futility in group-sequential trials with multiple co-primary endpoints.
    Asakura K; Hamasaki T; Evans SR
    Biom J; 2017 Jul; 59(4):703-731. PubMed ID: 27757980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A flexible futility monitoring method with time-varying conditional power boundary.
    Ying Zhang ; Clarke WR
    Clin Trials; 2010 Jun; 7(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 20423927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Review of Acute Treatment of Migraine Trial Results With the New FDA Endpoints: Design Implications for Future Trials.
    Hindiyeh NA; Kellerman DJ; Schmidt PC
    Headache; 2019 May; 59(5):819-824. PubMed ID: 30953576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adaptive Designs with Discrete Test Statistics and Consideration of Overrunning.
    Schmidt R; Burkhardt B; Faldum A
    Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(5):434-46. PubMed ID: 26429500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integrating phase 2 into phase 3 based on an intermediate endpoint while accounting for a cure proportion-With an application to the design of a clinical trial in acute myeloid leukemia.
    Rufibach K; Heinzmann D; Monnet A
    Pharm Stat; 2020 Jan; 19(1):44-58. PubMed ID: 31461220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An adaptive seamless phase II/III design for oncology trials with subpopulation selection using correlated survival endpoints.
    Jenkins M; Stone A; Jennison C
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(4):347-56. PubMed ID: 22328327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adaptive seamless designs with interim treatment selection: a case study in oncology.
    Carreras M; Gutjahr G; Brannath W
    Stat Med; 2015 Apr; 34(8):1317-33. PubMed ID: 25640198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Information time scales for interim analyses of randomized clinical trials.
    Freidlin B; Othus M; Korn EL
    Clin Trials; 2016 Aug; 13(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 27136947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A stratified adaptive two-stage design with co-primary endpoints for phase II clinical oncology trials.
    Cabarrou B; Leconte E; Sfumato P; Boher JM; Filleron T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Oct; 22(1):278. PubMed ID: 36289451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Adaptive clinical trial designs with blinded selection of binary composite endpoints and sample size reassessment.
    Roig MB; Melis GG; Posch M; Koenig F
    Biostatistics; 2023 Dec; 25(1):237-252. PubMed ID: 36150142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomarker enrichment considerations in oncology early development single-arm studies.
    Tian H; Liu K
    J Biopharm Stat; 2018; 28(2):282-291. PubMed ID: 28934023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimality criteria for futility stopping boundaries for group sequential designs with a continuous endpoint.
    Li X; Herrmann C; Rauch G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Nov; 20(1):274. PubMed ID: 33153438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of futility monitoring guidelines using completed phase III oncology trials.
    Zhang Q; Freidlin B; Korn EL; Halabi S; Mandrekar S; Dignam JJ
    Clin Trials; 2017 Feb; 14(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 27590208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptive extensions of a two-stage group sequential procedure for testing primary and secondary endpoints (I): unknown correlation between the endpoints.
    Tamhane AC; Wu Y; Mehta CR
    Stat Med; 2012 Aug; 31(19):2027-40. PubMed ID: 22729929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating futility of a binary clinical endpoint using early read-outs.
    Van Lancker K; Vandebosch A; Vansteelandt S; De Ridder F
    Stat Med; 2019 Dec; 38(28):5361-5375. PubMed ID: 31631357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using short-term endpoints to improve interim decision making and trial duration in two-stage phase II trials with nested binary endpoints.
    Zocholl D; Kunz CU; Rauch G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Sep; 32(9):1749-1765. PubMed ID: 37489267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.