BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31185938)

  • 21. Evaluating the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses: validation of O-RADS and comparison with ADNEX model, SA, and RMI.
    Wang R; Yang Z
    Ginekol Pol; 2023; 94(10):799-806. PubMed ID: 36929789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Which extrauterine pelvic masses are difficult to correctly classify as benign or malignant on the basis of ultrasound findings and is there a way of making a correct diagnosis?
    Valentin L; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Metzger U; Lécuru F; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 16526098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Magnetic resonance scoring system for assessment of adnexal masses: added value of diffusion-weighted imaging including apparent diffusion coefficient map.
    Hottat NA; Van Pachterbeke C; Vanden Houte K; Denolin V; Jani JC; Cannie MM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 57(3):478-487. PubMed ID: 32438461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of the Risk of Malignancy Index in daily clinical management of adnexal masses.
    van den Akker PA; Aalders AL; Snijders MP; Kluivers KB; Samlal RA; Vollebergh JH; Massuger LF
    Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Mar; 116(3):384-8. PubMed ID: 19959215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Application values of four risk of malignancy indices in the preoperative evaluation of patients with adnexal masses].
    Lou HY; Meng H; Zhu QL; Zhang Q; Jiang YX
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2010 Jun; 32(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 20602883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Risk of malignancy index for adnexal masses.
    Akdeniz N; Kuyumcuoğlu U; Kale A; Erdemoğlu M; Caca F
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2009; 30(2):178-80. PubMed ID: 19480249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Unilocular adnexal cysts with papillary projections but no other solid components: is there a diagnostic method that can classify them reliably as benign or malignant before surgery?
    Valentin L; Ameye L; Savelli L; Fruscio R; Leone FP; Czekierdowski A; Lissoni AA; Fischerova D; Guerriero S; Van Holsbeke C; Van Huffel S; Timmerman D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 41(5):570-81. PubMed ID: 22915541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Nomogram based on the O-RADS for predicting the malignancy risk of adnexal masses with complex ultrasound morphology.
    Gong LP; Li XY; Wu YN; Dong S; Zhang S; Feng YN; Lv YE; Guo XJ; Peng YQ; Du XS; Tian JW; Sun CX; Sun LT
    J Ovarian Res; 2023 Mar; 16(1):57. PubMed ID: 36945000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An improved risk of malignancy index in diagnosis of adnexal mass.
    Wang LM; Song H; Song X; Zhou XB
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2012 Feb; 125(3):533-5. PubMed ID: 22490416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical, ultrasound parameters and tumor marker-based mathematical models and scoring systems in pre-surgical diagnosis of adnexal tumors.
    Abdalla N; Winiarek J; Bachanek M; Cendrowski K; Sawicki W
    Ginekol Pol; 2016; 87(12):824-829. PubMed ID: 28098934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Intra- and interobserver agreement when describing adnexal masses using the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis terms and definitions: a study on three-dimensional ultrasound volumes.
    Sladkevicius P; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):318-27. PubMed ID: 22915506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Artificial neural network models for the preoperative discrimination between malignant and benign adnexal masses.
    Timmerman D; Verrelst H; Bourne TH; De Moor B; Collins WP; Vergote I; Vandewalle J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jan; 13(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 10201082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The ADNEX model to triage adnexal masses: An external validation study and comparison with the IOTA two-step strategy and subjective assessment by an experienced ultrasound operator.
    Viora E; Piovano E; Baima Poma C; Cotrino I; Castiglione A; Cavallero C; Sciarrone A; Bastonero S; Iskra L; Zola P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Apr; 247():207-211. PubMed ID: 32146226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Estimating the risk of malignancy of adnexal masses: validation of the ADNEX model in the hands of nonexpert ultrasonographers in a gynaecological oncology centre in China.
    He P; Wang JJ; Duan W; Song C; Yang Y; Wu QQ
    J Ovarian Res; 2021 Dec; 14(1):169. PubMed ID: 34857005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. D-dimer as a tumor marker in pre-operative assessment of adnexal masses.
    Worasethsin P; Narkwichean A
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 Nov; 96(11):1395-400. PubMed ID: 24428087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The value of human epididymis 4, D-dimer, and fibrinogen compared with CA 125 alone in triaging women presenting with pelvic masses: a retrospective cohort study.
    McKendry K; Duff S; Huang Y; Redha M; Scanlon Á; Abu Saadeh F; Gleeson N; O'Leary J; Norris L; O'Toole S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Jul; 100(7):1239-1247. PubMed ID: 33590896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessment of a new logistic model in the preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses.
    Alcázar JL; Errasti T; Laparte C; Jurado M; López-García G
    J Ultrasound Med; 2001 Aug; 20(8):841-8. PubMed ID: 11503920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of the risk of malignancy index and self-constructed logistic regression models in preoperative evaluation of adnexal masses.
    Yörük P; Dündar O; Yildizhan B; Tütüncü L; Pekin T
    J Ultrasound Med; 2008 Oct; 27(10):1469-77. PubMed ID: 18809957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [The estimation of the probability of tumor malignacy on the basis of test combination in the primary diagnosis of adnexal tumors].
    Smoleń A; Stachowicz N; Czekierowski A; Kotarski J
    Ginekol Pol; 2010 Apr; 81(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 20476596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
    Timmerman D; Testa AC; Bourne T; Ameye L; Jurkovic D; Van Holsbeke C; Paladini D; Van Calster B; Vergote I; Van Huffel S; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jun; 31(6):681-90. PubMed ID: 18504770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.