168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31186117)
1. Accuracy of tumor size measurements performed by magnetic resonance, ultrasound and mammography, and their correlation with pathological size in primary breast cancer.
Cuesta Cuesta AB; Martín Ríos MD; Noguero Meseguer MR; García Velasco JA; de Matías Martínez M; Bartolomé Sotillos S; Abreu Griego E
Cir Esp (Engl Ed); 2019; 97(7):391-396. PubMed ID: 31186117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement of tumour size with mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance imaging as compared to histological tumour size in primary breast cancer.
Gruber IV; Rueckert M; Kagan KO; Staebler A; Siegmann KC; Hartkopf A; Wallwiener D; Hahn M
BMC Cancer; 2013 Jul; 13():328. PubMed ID: 23826951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pathologic Tumor Size versus Mammography, Sonography, and MRI in Breast Cancer Based on Pathologic Subtypes.
Nonnemacher CJ; Dale P; Scott A; Bonner M
Am Surg; 2023 Aug; 89(8):3652-3654. PubMed ID: 37140069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) useful for diagnosis of additional sites of disease in patients recently diagnosed with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)?
Benveniste AP; Ortiz-Perez T; Ebuoma LO; Sepulveda KA; Severs FJ; Roark A; Wang T; Sedgwick EL
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Nov; 96():74-79. PubMed ID: 29103479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Efficacy of breast MRI for surgical decision in patients with breast cancer: ductal carcinoma in situ versus invasive ductal carcinoma.
Lee J; Jung JH; Kim WW; Park CS; Lee RK; Kim HJ; Kim WH; Park HY
BMC Cancer; 2020 Sep; 20(1):934. PubMed ID: 32993586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient age and tumor size determine the cancer yield of preoperative bilateral breast MRI in women with ductal carcinoma in situ.
Bae MS; Moon WK; Cho N; Chang JM; Seo M; Park IA; Han W
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep; 201(3):684-91. PubMed ID: 23971464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy in estimating tumor extension according to mammographic subtypes in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ.
Sato M; Fukutomi T; Akashi-Tanaka S; Miyakawa K; Yamamoto N; Hasegawa T
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2002 May; 32(5):157-61. PubMed ID: 12110641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: Evaluation of main presentations on magnetic resonance imaging compared with findings on mammogram and histology.
Badan GM; Roveda D; Paito S; Fleury Ede F; Maragno B; Campos MS; Ferreira CA; Ferreira FA
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2016; 62(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 27656851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of the ultrasound imaging of breast cancer and the expression of molecular biological indexes.
Xu J; Li F; Chang F
Pak J Pharm Sci; 2017 Jul; 30(4(Suppl.)):1425-1430. PubMed ID: 29043992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative accuracy of preoperative tumor size assessment on mammography, sonography, and MRI: Is the accuracy affected by breast density or cancer subtype?
Leddy R; Irshad A; Metcalfe A; Mabalam P; Abid A; Ackerman S; Lewis M
J Clin Ultrasound; 2016 Jan; 44(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 26294391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tumor Size of Invasive Breast Cancer on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Conventional Imaging (Mammogram/Ultrasound): Comparison with Pathological Size and Clinical Implications.
Haraldsdóttir KH; Jónsson Þ; Halldórsdóttir AB; Tranberg KG; Ásgeirsson KS
Scand J Surg; 2017 Mar; 106(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 26929290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The role of ultrasound in the surgical management of patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.
Khakpour N; Zager JS; Yen T; Stephens T; Kuerer HM; Singletary ES; Ross MI; Hunt KK; Babiera GV
Breast J; 2006; 12(3):212-5. PubMed ID: 16684318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Predicting Breast Tumor Size for Pre-operative Planning: Which Imaging Modality is Best?
Katz B; Raker C; Edmonson D; Gass J; Stuckey A; Rizack T
Breast J; 2017 Jan; 23(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 27612172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Surgical Outcomes for Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Impact of Preoperative MRI.
Yoon GY; Choi WJ; Kim HH; Cha JH; Shin HJ; Chae EY
Radiology; 2020 May; 295(2):296-303. PubMed ID: 32181727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of mammography, ultrasound, and MRI in size assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ with histopathologic correlation.
Baek SH; Choi WJ; Cha JH; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Chae EY
Acta Radiol; 2017 Dec; 58(12):1434-1441. PubMed ID: 28281788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of breast MRI in women eligible for breast conservation surgery and intra-operative radiation therapy.
Paudel N; Bethke KP; Wang LC; Strauss JB; Hayes JP; Donnelly ED
Surg Oncol; 2018 Mar; 27(1):95-99. PubMed ID: 29549911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: mammographic-pathologic correlation.
Poplack SP; Wells WA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jun; 170(6):1543-9. PubMed ID: 9609171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic accuracy of mammography, clinical examination, US, and MR imaging in preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Berg WA; Gutierrez L; NessAiver MS; Carter WB; Bhargavan M; Lewis RS; Ioffe OB
Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):830-49. PubMed ID: 15486214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. MRI-guided quadrantectomy in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ detected preoperatively by mammographic calcifications.
Sakakibara M; Yokomizo J; Shiina N; Kazama T; Nakamura R; Fujimoto H; Nagashima T; Takishima H; Nakatani Y; Miyazaki M
J Am Coll Surg; 2014 Aug; 219(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 24880957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value of pre-operative breast MRI for the size assessment of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Proulx F; Correa JA; Ferré R; Omeroglu A; Aldis A; Meterissian S; Mesurolle B
Br J Radiol; 2016; 89(1058):20150543. PubMed ID: 26568438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
