These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31186129)

  • 1. New trends in production management in European pig AI centers.
    Schulze M; Nitsche-Melkus E; Jakop U; Jung M; Waberski D
    Theriogenology; 2019 Oct; 137():88-92. PubMed ID: 31186129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of production management on semen quality during long-term storage in different European boar studs.
    Schulze M; Kuster C; Schäfer J; Jung M; Grossfeld R
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2018 Mar; 190():94-101. PubMed ID: 29397251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Analysis of hygienic critical control points in boar semen production.
    Schulze M; Ammon C; Rüdiger K; Jung M; Grobbel M
    Theriogenology; 2015 Feb; 83(3):430-7. PubMed ID: 25459424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality Control of Boar Sperm Processing: Implications from European AI Centres and Two Spermatology Reference Laboratories.
    Riesenbeck A; Schulze M; Rüdiger K; Henning H; Waberski D
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2015 Jul; 50 Suppl 2():1-4. PubMed ID: 26174912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of hygiene on bacterial contamination in extended boar semen: An eight-year retrospective study of 28 European AI centers.
    Nitsche-Melkus E; Bortfeldt R; Jung M; Schulze M
    Theriogenology; 2020 Apr; 146():133-139. PubMed ID: 31806246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of refractometry as a new management tool in AI boar centers for quality assurance of extender preparations.
    Schulze M; Rüdiger K; Jung M; Grossfeld R
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2015 Jan; 152():77-82. PubMed ID: 25498146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The value of microscopic semen motility assessment at collection for a commercial artificial insemination center, a retrospective study on factors explaining variation in pig fertility.
    Broekhuijse ML; Soštarić E; Feitsma H; Gadella BM
    Theriogenology; 2012 Apr; 77(7):1466-1479.e3. PubMed ID: 22289218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influences on thermo-resistance of boar spermatozoa.
    Schulze M; Jakop U; Jung M; Cabezón F
    Theriogenology; 2019 Mar; 127():15-20. PubMed ID: 30611970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Machine learning to further improve the decision which boar ejaculates to process into artificial insemination doses.
    Kamphuis C; Duenk P; Veerkamp RF; Visser B; Singh G; Nigsch A; De Mol RM; Broekhuijse MLWJ
    Theriogenology; 2020 Mar; 144():112-121. PubMed ID: 31927416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of preserved boar semen for artificial insemination: Past, present and future challenges.
    Waberski D; Riesenbeck A; Schulze M; Weitze KF; Johnson L
    Theriogenology; 2019 Oct; 137():2-7. PubMed ID: 31186127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lifetime and removal reasons for Pietrain boars in European AI centers: a retrospective analysis.
    Henneberg S; Kleve-Feld M; Schröter F; Jung M; Schulze M
    J Anim Sci; 2023 Jan; 101():. PubMed ID: 36525599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Science-based quality control in boar semen production.
    Schulze M; Jung M; Hensel B
    Mol Reprod Dev; 2023 Jul; 90(7):612-620. PubMed ID: 35355365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of vibration emissions during shipping of artificial insemination doses on boar semen quality.
    Schulze M; Bortfeldt R; Schäfer J; Jung M; Fuchs-Kittowski F
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2018 May; 192():328-334. PubMed ID: 29622350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimizing semen production for artificial insemination in swine.
    Colenbrander B; Feitsma H; Grooten HJ
    J Reprod Fertil Suppl; 1993; 48():207-15. PubMed ID: 8145205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality and fertility of cooled-shipped stallion semen at the time of insemination.
    Heckenbichler S; Deichsel K; Peters P; Aurich C
    Theriogenology; 2011 Mar; 75(5):849-56. PubMed ID: 21196042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temperature management during semen processing: Impact on boar sperm quality under laboratory and field conditions.
    Schulze M; Henning H; Rüdiger K; Wallner U; Waberski D
    Theriogenology; 2013 Dec; 80(9):990-8. PubMed ID: 23987989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perspectives for artificial insemination and genomics to improve global swine populations.
    Gerrits RJ; Lunney JK; Johnson LA; Pursel VG; Kraeling RR; Rohrer GA; Dobrinsky JR
    Theriogenology; 2005 Jan; 63(2):283-99. PubMed ID: 15626400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influences on semen traits used for selection of young AI boars.
    Schulze M; Buder S; Rüdiger K; Beyerbach M; Waberski D
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2014 Aug; 148(3-4):164-70. PubMed ID: 25001503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In Vitro Measures for Assessing Boar Semen Fertility.
    Jung M; Rüdiger K; Schulze M
    Reprod Domest Anim; 2015 Jul; 50 Suppl 2():20-4. PubMed ID: 26174915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality and fertilizing capacity of boar spermatozoa during liquid storage in extender supplemented with different antibiotics.
    Bryła M; Trzcińska M
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2015 Dec; 163():157-63. PubMed ID: 26586542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.