89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31186178)
1. Role of ThinPrep liquid-based cytology in evaluation of the endocervical canal in patients with abnormal cervical screening.
Al-Nourhji O; Dermawan JK; Booth CN; Underwood D; Abdul-Karim FW
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2019; 8(5):278-283. PubMed ID: 31186178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cytology and curetting diagnosis of endocervical adenocarcinoma.
Bruehl FK; Dyhdalo KS; Hou Y; Clapacs E; Przybycin CG; Reynolds JP
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(6):556-562. PubMed ID: 32624383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ-from Papanicolaou test to hysterectomy: a series of 74 cases.
Lashmanova N; Braun A; Cheng L; Gattuso P; Yan L
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2022; 11(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 34509373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increasing the sensitivity of endocervical curettings by performing ThinPrep® Pap on transport container fluid: is diagnostic material going down the drain?
Lastra RR; Meykler SE; Baloch ZW; Barroeta JE
Cytopathology; 2015 Dec; 26(6):368-72. PubMed ID: 25123326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. ThinPrep Pap Test: performance and biopsy follow-up in a university hospital.
Carpenter AB; Davey DD
Cancer; 1999 Jun; 87(3):105-12. PubMed ID: 10385440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cytomorphologic Features of Gastric-Type Endocervical Adenocarcinoma in Liquid-Based Preparations.
Schwock J; Starova B; Khan ZF; Mirkovic J; Parra-Herran C; Ko HM; Rouzbahman M; Ghorab Z
Acta Cytol; 2021; 65(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 33152741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Cellient automated cell block system is useful in the differential diagnosis of atypical glandular cells in Papanicolaou tests.
Xing W; Hou AY; Fischer A; Owens CL; Jiang Z
Cancer Cytopathol; 2014 Jan; 122(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 23963870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Increased diagnostic accuracy of atypical glandular cells in cervical liquid-based cytology using cell blocks.
Risse EK; Holierhoek JP; Meijer-Marres EM; Ouwerkerk-Noordam E; Boon ME
Cytopathology; 2011 Aug; 22(4):253-60. PubMed ID: 20726867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Colposcopic endocervical brushing cytology appears to be more sensitive than histologic endocervical curettage for detecting endocervical adenocarcinoma.
Zou T; Dave S; Adler RN; Manning MJ; Scott MP; Strock C; Kandil D; Cosar E; Fischer AH
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(2):135-140. PubMed ID: 33097463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The role of cervical cytology and colposcopy in detecting cervical glandular neoplasia.
Ullal A; Roberts M; Bulmer JN; Mathers ME; Wadehra V
Cytopathology; 2009 Dec; 20(6):359-66. PubMed ID: 18557985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?
Sigurdsson K
Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 23331613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gastric-type endocervical adenocarcinoma and cervical cytology: Experience at a general hospital and review of the literature.
Greenland NY; Wolsky RJ; Darragh TM; Vohra P
Cytopathology; 2021 Jan; 32(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 32851700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Tall-columnar glandular cells in SurePath™ liquid-based cytology Pap sample: Learning from mimics/pitfalls.
Gupta N; Jain V; Srinivasan R; Singh T
Cytopathology; 2024 Jul; 35(4):510-514. PubMed ID: 38712698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endocervical curettage in the evaluation of cervical disease in patients with adequate colposcopy.
Soisson AP; Molina CY; Benson WL
Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Jan; 71(1):109-11. PubMed ID: 3336531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The "Inconclusive--possible high grade epithelial abnormality" category in Papanicolaou smear reporting.
Schoolland M; Sterrett GF; Knowles SA; Mitchell KM; Kurinczuk JJ
Cancer; 1998 Aug; 84(4):208-17. PubMed ID: 9723595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The reporting rates of atypical glandular cells and their HPV testing and histologic follow-up results: a comparison between ThinPrep and SurePath preparations from a single academic institution.
Liu S; Gibbons-Fideler IS; Tonkovich D; Shen R; Li Z
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2019; 8(3):128-132. PubMed ID: 31097288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lack of Agreement Between Endocervical Brush and Endocervical Curettage in Women Undergoing Repeat Endocervical Sampling.
Doo DW; Stickrath EH; Mazzoni SE; Alston MJ
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2016 Oct; 20(4):296-9. PubMed ID: 27518843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endocervical curetting vs. endocervical brushing as case finding methods.
Maksem JA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 May; 34(5):313-6. PubMed ID: 16604549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of two preparation methods for endocervical evaluation.
Kim HS; Park JS; Park JY; Hong SR; Seong SJ; Kim HS; Wilbur DC
Acta Cytol; 2007; 51(5):742-8. PubMed ID: 17910344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical specimens collected in liquid buffer are suitable for both cytologic screening and ancillary human papillomavirus testing.
Sherman ME; Schiffman MH; Lorincz AT; Herrero R; Hutchinson ML; Bratti C; Zahniser D; Morales J; Hildesheim A; Helgesen K; Kelly D; Alfaro M; Mena F; Balmaceda I; Mango L; Greenberg M
Cancer; 1997 Apr; 81(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 9126136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
