1300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31188154)
1. Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
Lund M; Trads M; Njor SH; Erichsen R; Andersen B
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Nov; 17(11):2265-2300. PubMed ID: 31188154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The performance indicator of colonic intubation (PICI) in a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
Lund M; Erichsen R; Njor SH; Laurberg S; Valori R; Andersen B
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Sep; 54(9):1176-1181. PubMed ID: 31498716
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
Lund M; Erichsen R; Valori R; Møller Jensen T; Helle Njor S; Laurberg S; Andersen B;
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 54(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 30978128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.
Lee TJ; Rutter MD; Blanks RG; Moss SM; Goddard AF; Chilton A; Nickerson C; McNally RJ; Patnick J; Rees CJ
Gut; 2012 Jul; 61(7):1050-7. PubMed ID: 21940723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The 'ins and outs' of colonoscopy at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, South Africa: A practice audit of the outpatient endoscopy unit.
Bouter C; Barrow P; Bizos D; Bobat B; Devar J; Harran N; Joseph C; Mahomed A; Oettle J; Ramos J; Seabi M; Kgabage G; Gaylard P; Surridge D; Etheredge H; Fabian J; Lutrin D; Karlsson K
S Afr Med J; 2020 Nov; 110(12):1186-1190. PubMed ID: 33403963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of cecal intubation and adenoma detection between hospitals can provide incentives to improve quality of colonoscopy.
Belderbos TD; Grobbee EJ; van Oijen MG; Meijssen MA; Ouwendijk RJ; Tang TJ; ter Borg F; van der Schaar P; Le Fèvre DM; Stouten MT; van der Galiën O; Hiemstra TJ; de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel WH; ter Borg PC; Spaander MC; Moons LM; Kuipers EJ; Siersema PD
Endoscopy; 2015 Aug; 47(8):703-9. PubMed ID: 26090725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of efficacy of colonoscopy between the morning and afternoon: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wu J; Zhao SB; Wang SL; Fang J; Xia T; Su XJ; Xu C; Li ZS; Bai Y
Dig Liver Dis; 2018 Jul; 50(7):661-667. PubMed ID: 29776746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Withdrawal time of 8 minutes is associated with higher adenoma detection rates in surveillance colonoscopy after surgery for colorectal cancer.
Jung DH; Lee JI; Huh CW; Kim MJ; Youn YH; Choi YH; Kim BW
Surg Endosc; 2021 May; 35(5):2354-2361. PubMed ID: 32440929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).
Zorzi M; Senore C; Da Re F; Barca A; Bonelli LA; Cannizzaro R; Fasoli R; Di Furia L; Di Giulio E; Mantellini P; Naldoni C; Sassatelli R; Rex D; Hassan C; Zappa M;
Gut; 2015 Sep; 64(9):1389-96. PubMed ID: 25227521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adenoma detection rates in an opportunistic screening colonoscopy program in Iran, a country with rising colorectal cancer incidence.
Delavari A; Bishehsari F; Salimzadeh H; Khosravi P; Delavari F; Nasseri-Moghaddam S; Merat S; Ansari R; Vahedi H; Shahbazkhani B; Saberifiroozi M; Sotoudeh M; Malekzadeh R
BMC Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 14():196. PubMed ID: 25404264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.
Kozbial K; Reinhart K; Heinze G; Zwatz C; Bannert C; Salzl P; Waldmann E; Britto-Arias M; Ferlitsch A; Trauner M; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
Endoscopy; 2015 Mar; 47(3):207-16. PubMed ID: 25412094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs in Latin America: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Montalvan-Sanchez EE; Norwood DA; Dougherty M; Beas R; Guranizo-Ortiz M; Ramirez-Rojas M; Morgan DR; Imperiale TF
JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Feb; 7(2):e2354256. PubMed ID: 38300621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Educational interventions are associated with improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Causada-Calo NS; Gonzalez-Moreno EI; Bishay K; Shorr R; Dube C; Heitman SJ; Hilsden RJ; Rostom A; Walsh C; Anderson JT; Keswani RN; Scaffidi MA; Grover SC; Forbes N
Endosc Int Open; 2020 Oct; 8(10):E1321-E1331. PubMed ID: 33015334
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Adenoma detection rate metrics in colorectal cancer surveillance colonoscopy.
Tjaden JM; Hause JA; Berger D; Duveneck SK; Jakate SM; Orkin BA; Hubbard EL; Melson JE
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jul; 32(7):3108-3113. PubMed ID: 29340817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Associations between endoscopist feedback and improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bishay K; Causada-Calo N; Scaffidi MA; Walsh CM; Anderson JT; Rostom A; Dube C; Keswani RN; Heitman SJ; Hilsden RJ; Shorr R; Grover SC; Forbes N
Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Nov; 92(5):1030-1040.e9. PubMed ID: 32330506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ileal intubation is not associated with higher detection rate of right-sided conventional adenomas and serrated polyps compared to cecal intubation after adjustment for overall adenoma detection rate.
Buerger M; Kasper P; Allo G; Gillessen J; Schramm C
BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):190. PubMed ID: 31730463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Temporal trends and variability of colonoscopy performance in a gastroenterology practice.
le Clercq CM; Mooi RJ; Winkens B; Salden BN; Bakker CM; van Nunen AB; Keulen EP; de Ridder RJ; Masclee AA; Sanduleanu S
Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 26808394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Colonoscopist Performance and Colorectal Cancer Risk After Adenoma Removal to Stratify Surveillance: Two Nationwide Observational Studies.
Wieszczy P; Waldmann E; Løberg M; Regula J; Rupinski M; Bugajski M; Gray K; Kalager M; Ferlitsch M; Kaminski MF; Bretthauer M
Gastroenterology; 2021 Mar; 160(4):1067-1074.e6. PubMed ID: 33065063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of colonoscopy quality measures on patients' colonoscopist selection.
Solad Y; Wang C; Laine L; Deng Y; Schwartz H; Ciarleglio MM; Aslanian HR
Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Feb; 110(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 25070055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Open Access Colonoscopy for Colorectal Cancer Prevention: An Evaluation of Appropriateness and Quality.
Kapila N; Singh H; Kandragunta K; Castro FJ
Dig Dis Sci; 2019 Oct; 64(10):2798-2805. PubMed ID: 30955174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
