These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31188317)

  • 1. Oral or Vaginal Misoprostol for Labor Induction and Cesarean Delivery Risk.
    Handal-Orefice RC; Friedman AM; Chouinard SM; Eke AC; Feinberg B; Politch J; Iverson RE; Yarrington CD
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 134(1):10-16. PubMed ID: 31188317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tachysystole and risk of cesarean section after labor induction using misoprostol: A cohort study.
    Sichitiu J; Vial Y; Panchaud A; Baud D; Desseauve D
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jun; 249():54-58. PubMed ID: 32361173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The efficacy of misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol in the induction of labor of nulliparous women: A randomized national multicenter trial.
    Hokkila E; Kruit H; Rahkonen L; Timonen S; Mattila M; Laatio L; Ordén MR; Uotila J; Luukkaala T; Tihtonen K
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Aug; 98(8):1032-1039. PubMed ID: 30771243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Induction of labour in nulliparous women- quick or slow: a cohort study comparing slow-release vaginal insert with low-dose misoprostol oral tablets.
    Eriksson A; Jeppesen S; Krebs L
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Feb; 20(1):79. PubMed ID: 32033600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Labor induction with misoprostol vaginal insert compared with dinoprostone vaginal insert.
    Maggi C; Mazzoni G; Gerosa V; Fratelli N; Prefumo F; Sartori E; Lojacono A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2019 Oct; 98(10):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 31140585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Randomized trial of two doses of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol for labor induction.
    Farah LA; Sanchez-Ramos L; Rosa C; Del Valle GO; Gaudier FL; Delke I; Kaunitz AM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Aug; 177(2):364-9; discussion 369-71. PubMed ID: 9290452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Oral and vaginal misoprostol compared with dinoprostone for induction of labor: a randomized controlled trial.
    le Roux PA; Olarogun JO; Penny J; Anthony J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Feb; 99(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 11814497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Ham D; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 180(5):1155-60. PubMed ID: 10329871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial.
    Pimentel VM; Arabkhazaeli M; Moon JY; Wang A; Kapedani A; Bernstein PS; Tropper PJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):614.e1-614.e8. PubMed ID: 29614276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety of misoprostol for near-term and term induction in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies compared to dinoprostone and primary cesarean section: results of a retrospective cohort study.
    Steetskamp J; Bachmann E; Hasenburg A; Battista MJ
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Dec; 302(6):1369-1374. PubMed ID: 32761274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Predictors of successful labor induction with oral or vaginal misoprostol.
    Crane JM; Delaney T; Butt KD; Bennett KA; Hutchens D; Young DC
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 May; 15(5):319-23. PubMed ID: 15280123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Labor Induction Outcomes with Outpatient Misoprostol for Cervical Ripening among Low-Risk Women.
    Kandahari N; Schneider AN; Tucker LS; Raine-Bennett TR; Mohta VJ
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e818-e826. PubMed ID: 36130669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical experience with misoprostol vaginal insert for induction of labor: a prospective clinical observational study.
    Schmidt M; Neophytou M; Hars O; Freudenberg J; Kühnert M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Jan; 299(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 30374645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combination of Foley bulb and vaginal misoprostol compared with vaginal misoprostol alone for cervical ripening and labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Carbone JF; Tuuli MG; Fogertey PJ; Roehl KA; Macones GA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Feb; 121(2 Pt 1):247-252. PubMed ID: 23303106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of delayed misoprostol dosing interval for induction of labor: a retrospective study.
    Harman Crowell EH; Crowell AM; Theiler RN
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Aug; 19(1):309. PubMed ID: 31455215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized clinical trial comparing vaginal misoprostol versus cervical Foley plus oral misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Hill JB; Thigpen BD; Bofill JA; Magann E; Moore LE; Martin JN
    Am J Perinatol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 18850516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
    Dällenbach P; Boulvain M; Viardot C; Irion O
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 188(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 12548212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Is vaginal misoprostol more effective than oral misoprostol for cervical ripening in obese women?
    Soni S; Pappas K; Lesser ML; Blitz MJ; Augustine SA; Rochelson B
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Oct; 33(20):3476-3483. PubMed ID: 30741048
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Induction of labor at term with vaginal misoprostol or a prostaglandin E2 pessary: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial.
    Gaudineau A; Senat MV; Ehlinger V; Gallini A; Morin M; Olivier P; Roth E; Orusco E; Javoise S; Fort J; Lavergne C; Arnaud C; Rozenberg P; Vayssiere C;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):542.e1-542.e8. PubMed ID: 33887241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol vs transvaginal balloon catheter for labor induction: An observational study within the SWEdish Postterm Induction Study (SWEPIS).
    Alkmark M; Carlsson Y; Wendel SB; Elden H; Fadl H; Jonsson M; Ladfors L; Saltvedt S; Sengpiel V; Wessberg A; Wikström AK; Hagberg H; Wennerholm UB
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Aug; 100(8):1463-1477. PubMed ID: 33768520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.