These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31188317)

  • 21. Oral misoprostol versus intravaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a comparison study.
    Neri C; Familiari A; Preziosi F; Vassallo C; Botta A; Lanzone A; Carducci B; Caruso A
    Minerva Ginecol; 2018 Aug; 70(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 29376620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Labor induction post-term with 25 micrograms vs. 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol.
    Meydanli MM; Calişkan E; Burak F; Narin MA; Atmaca R
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Jun; 81(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 12767565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial.
    Gomez HB; Hoffman MK; Caplan R; Ruhstaller K; Young MHH; Sciscione AC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 224(5):524.e1-524.e8. PubMed ID: 33617796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Induction of labor with misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes beyond thirty-six weeks' gestation.
    Wing DA; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jul; 179(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 9704771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
    Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of vaginal versus buccal misoprostol for cervical ripening in women for labor induction at term (the IMPROVE trial): a triple-masked randomized controlled trial.
    Haas DM; Daggy J; Flannery KM; Dorr ML; Bonsack C; Bhamidipalli SS; Pierson RC; Lathrop A; Towns R; Ngo N; Head A; Morgan S; Quinney SK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 221(3):259.e1-259.e16. PubMed ID: 31075246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus dinoprostone vaginal insert: A comparison of labour and delivery outcomes.
    Rankin K; Chodankar R; Raymond K; Bhaskar S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Apr; 235():93-96. PubMed ID: 30122321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.
    Orr L; Reisinger-Kindle K; Roy A; Levine L; Connolly K; Visintainer P; Schoen CN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 223(5):743.e1-743.e17. PubMed ID: 32387325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Comparative study of the effect of intravaginal misoprostol at 50 and 100 micrograms in cervical ripening and labor induction].
    Reyna-Villasmil E; Guerra-Velásquez M; Torres-Montilla M; Reyna-Villasmil N; Mejia-Montilla J; Labarca-Vincero N
    Invest Clin; 2005 Jun; 46(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 16001749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of various routes and dosages of misoprostol for cervical ripening and the induction of labor.
    How HY; Leaseburge L; Khoury JC; Siddiqi TA; Spinnato JA; Sibai BM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Oct; 185(4):911-5. PubMed ID: 11641677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Foley Bulb Added to an Oral Misoprostol Induction Protocol: A Cluster Randomized Trial.
    Adhikari EH; Nelson DB; McIntire DD; Leveno KJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Nov; 136(5):953-961. PubMed ID: 33030881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction in nulliparous women at term.
    Faucett AM; Daniels K; Lee HC; El-Sayed YY; Blumenfeld YJ
    J Perinatol; 2014 Feb; 34(2):95-9. PubMed ID: 24157494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Wing DA; Rahall A; Jones MM; Goodwin TM; Paul RH
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Standard and adjusted criteria for the use of the misoprostol vaginal insert for labor induction: a comparative cohort study.
    Brandstetter A; Döbert M; Schwaerzler P; Döbert TF; Hasselbeck H; Henrich W
    J Perinat Med; 2019 Sep; 47(7):750-756. PubMed ID: 31373898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Misoprostol vaginal insert versus misoprostol vaginal tablets for the induction of labour: a cohort study.
    Bolla D; Weissleder SV; Radan AP; Gasparri ML; Raio L; Müller M; Surbek D
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 May; 18(1):149. PubMed ID: 29747591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol for labor induction in term pregnancies: a pair-matched case-control study.
    Döbert M; Brandstetter A; Henrich W; Rawnaq T; Hasselbeck H; Döbert TF; Hinkson L; Schwaerzler P
    J Perinat Med; 2018 Apr; 46(3):309-316. PubMed ID: 28672758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Vaginal Compared With Oral Misoprostol Induction at Term: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Adhikari EH; McGuire J; Lo J; McIntire DD; Spong CY; Nelson DB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Feb; 143(2):256-264. PubMed ID: 37989142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Oral versus vaginal misoprostol for labor induction.
    Hall R; Duarte-Gardea M; Harlass F
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 99(6):1044-8. PubMed ID: 12052597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
    Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.