These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31188493)

  • 1. Setting expected timelines of fished population recovery for the adaptive management of a marine protected area network.
    Kaplan KA; Yamane L; Botsford LW; Baskett ML; Hastings A; Worden S; White JW
    Ecol Appl; 2019 Sep; 29(6):e01949. PubMed ID: 31188493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of protogynous sex change on recovery of fish populations within marine protected areas.
    Easter EE; Adreani MS; Hamilton SL; Steele MA; Pang S; White JW
    Ecol Appl; 2020 Apr; 30(3):e02070. PubMed ID: 31903628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantifying the statistical power of monitoring programs for marine protected areas.
    Perkins NR; Prall M; Chakraborty A; White JW; Baskett ML; Morgan SG
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Jan; 31(1):e2215. PubMed ID: 32767487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Drivers of redistribution of fishing and non-fishing effort after the implementation of a marine protected area network.
    Cabral RB; Gaines SD; Johnson BA; Bell TW; White C
    Ecol Appl; 2017 Mar; 27(2):416-428. PubMed ID: 28207172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Variation in responses of fishes across multiple reserves within a network of marine protected areas in temperate waters.
    Starr RM; Wendt DE; Barnes CL; Marks CI; Malone D; Waltz G; Schmidt KT; Chiu J; Launer AL; Hall NC; Yochum N
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0118502. PubMed ID: 25760856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decision analysis for designing marine protected areas for multiple species with uncertain fishery status.
    White JW; Botsford LW; Moffitt EA; Fischer DT
    Ecol Appl; 2010 Sep; 20(6):1523-41. PubMed ID: 20945757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temperate marine reserves enhance targeted but not untargeted fishes in multiple no-take MPAs.
    Tetreault I; Ambrose RF
    Ecol Appl; 2007 Dec; 17(8):2251-67. PubMed ID: 18213966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Designing MPAs for food security in open-access fisheries.
    Cabral RB; Halpern BS; Lester SE; White C; Gaines SD; Costello C
    Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):8033. PubMed ID: 31142773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ecological success of no-take marine protected areas: Using population dynamics theory to inform a global meta-analysis.
    Hopf JK; Quennessen V; Ridgway J; Barceló C; Caltabellotta FP; Farnsworth Hayroyan S; Garcia D; McLeod M; Lester SE; Nickols K; Yeager M; White JW
    Ecol Appl; 2024 Oct; 34(7):e3027. PubMed ID: 39256998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sampling mobile oceanic fishes and sharks: implications for fisheries and conservation planning.
    Letessier TB; Bouchet PJ; Meeuwig JJ
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 May; 92(2):627-646. PubMed ID: 26680116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Model-based assessment of persistence in proposed marine protected area designs.
    Kaplan DM; Botsford LW; O'Farrell MR; Gaines SD; Jorgensen S
    Ecol Appl; 2009 Mar; 19(2):433-48. PubMed ID: 19323201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fishing-gear restrictions and biomass gains for coral reef fishes in marine protected areas.
    Campbell SJ; Edgar GJ; Stuart-Smith RD; Soler G; Bates AE
    Conserv Biol; 2018 Apr; 32(2):401-410. PubMed ID: 28776761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marine protected area networks in California, USA.
    Botsford LW; White JW; Carr MH; Caselle JE
    Adv Mar Biol; 2014; 69():205-51. PubMed ID: 25358301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Marine protected areas and the value of spatially optimized fishery management.
    Rassweiler A; Costello C; Siegel DA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Jul; 109(29):11884-9. PubMed ID: 22753469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of pre-closure fishing effort on marine protected area performance in social-ecological dimensions: Implications for developing marine conservation plans.
    Li Y; Sun M; Ren Y; Chen Y
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Aug; 729():138936. PubMed ID: 32361451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of fish movement assumptions on the design of a marine protected area to protect an overfished stock.
    Cornejo-Donoso J; Einarsson B; Birnir B; Gaines SD
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186309. PubMed ID: 29023580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fishing pressure impacts the abundance gradient of European lobsters across the borders of a newly established marine protected area.
    Nillos Kleiven PJ; Espeland SH; Olsen EM; Abesamis RA; Moland E; Kleiven AR
    Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Jan; 286(1894):20182455. PubMed ID: 30963876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recovery trajectories of kelp forest animals are rapid yet spatially variable across a network of temperate marine protected areas.
    Caselle JE; Rassweiler A; Hamilton SL; Warner RR
    Sci Rep; 2015 Sep; 5():14102. PubMed ID: 26373803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence that spillover from Marine Protected Areas benefits the spiny lobster (Panulirus interruptus) fishery in southern California.
    Lenihan HS; Gallagher JP; Peters JR; Stier AC; Hofmeister JKK; Reed DC
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):2663. PubMed ID: 33514853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Community- and government-managed marine protected areas increase fish size, biomass and potential value.
    Chirico AAD; McClanahan TR; Eklöf JS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182342. PubMed ID: 28806740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.