157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31188493)
1. Setting expected timelines of fished population recovery for the adaptive management of a marine protected area network.
Kaplan KA; Yamane L; Botsford LW; Baskett ML; Hastings A; Worden S; White JW
Ecol Appl; 2019 Sep; 29(6):e01949. PubMed ID: 31188493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of protogynous sex change on recovery of fish populations within marine protected areas.
Easter EE; Adreani MS; Hamilton SL; Steele MA; Pang S; White JW
Ecol Appl; 2020 Apr; 30(3):e02070. PubMed ID: 31903628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantifying the statistical power of monitoring programs for marine protected areas.
Perkins NR; Prall M; Chakraborty A; White JW; Baskett ML; Morgan SG
Ecol Appl; 2021 Jan; 31(1):e2215. PubMed ID: 32767487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Drivers of redistribution of fishing and non-fishing effort after the implementation of a marine protected area network.
Cabral RB; Gaines SD; Johnson BA; Bell TW; White C
Ecol Appl; 2017 Mar; 27(2):416-428. PubMed ID: 28207172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Variation in responses of fishes across multiple reserves within a network of marine protected areas in temperate waters.
Starr RM; Wendt DE; Barnes CL; Marks CI; Malone D; Waltz G; Schmidt KT; Chiu J; Launer AL; Hall NC; Yochum N
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0118502. PubMed ID: 25760856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Decision analysis for designing marine protected areas for multiple species with uncertain fishery status.
White JW; Botsford LW; Moffitt EA; Fischer DT
Ecol Appl; 2010 Sep; 20(6):1523-41. PubMed ID: 20945757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Temperate marine reserves enhance targeted but not untargeted fishes in multiple no-take MPAs.
Tetreault I; Ambrose RF
Ecol Appl; 2007 Dec; 17(8):2251-67. PubMed ID: 18213966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Designing MPAs for food security in open-access fisheries.
Cabral RB; Halpern BS; Lester SE; White C; Gaines SD; Costello C
Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):8033. PubMed ID: 31142773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sampling mobile oceanic fishes and sharks: implications for fisheries and conservation planning.
Letessier TB; Bouchet PJ; Meeuwig JJ
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2017 May; 92(2):627-646. PubMed ID: 26680116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Model-based assessment of persistence in proposed marine protected area designs.
Kaplan DM; Botsford LW; O'Farrell MR; Gaines SD; Jorgensen S
Ecol Appl; 2009 Mar; 19(2):433-48. PubMed ID: 19323201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fishing-gear restrictions and biomass gains for coral reef fishes in marine protected areas.
Campbell SJ; Edgar GJ; Stuart-Smith RD; Soler G; Bates AE
Conserv Biol; 2018 Apr; 32(2):401-410. PubMed ID: 28776761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marine protected area networks in California, USA.
Botsford LW; White JW; Carr MH; Caselle JE
Adv Mar Biol; 2014; 69():205-51. PubMed ID: 25358301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Marine protected areas and the value of spatially optimized fishery management.
Rassweiler A; Costello C; Siegel DA
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2012 Jul; 109(29):11884-9. PubMed ID: 22753469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of pre-closure fishing effort on marine protected area performance in social-ecological dimensions: Implications for developing marine conservation plans.
Li Y; Sun M; Ren Y; Chen Y
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Aug; 729():138936. PubMed ID: 32361451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of fish movement assumptions on the design of a marine protected area to protect an overfished stock.
Cornejo-Donoso J; Einarsson B; Birnir B; Gaines SD
PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0186309. PubMed ID: 29023580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fishing pressure impacts the abundance gradient of European lobsters across the borders of a newly established marine protected area.
Nillos Kleiven PJ; Espeland SH; Olsen EM; Abesamis RA; Moland E; Kleiven AR
Proc Biol Sci; 2019 Jan; 286(1894):20182455. PubMed ID: 30963876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Recovery trajectories of kelp forest animals are rapid yet spatially variable across a network of temperate marine protected areas.
Caselle JE; Rassweiler A; Hamilton SL; Warner RR
Sci Rep; 2015 Sep; 5():14102. PubMed ID: 26373803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evidence that spillover from Marine Protected Areas benefits the spiny lobster (Panulirus interruptus) fishery in southern California.
Lenihan HS; Gallagher JP; Peters JR; Stier AC; Hofmeister JKK; Reed DC
Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):2663. PubMed ID: 33514853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Community- and government-managed marine protected areas increase fish size, biomass and potential value.
Chirico AAD; McClanahan TR; Eklöf JS
PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0182342. PubMed ID: 28806740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Designing marine reserve networks for both conservation and fisheries management.
Gaines SD; White C; Carr MH; Palumbi SR
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Oct; 107(43):18286-93. PubMed ID: 20200311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
