446 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31188731)
21. The influence of prostate-specific antigen density on positive and negative predictive values of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect Gleason score 7-10 prostate cancer in a repeat biopsy setting.
Hansen NL; Barrett T; Koo B; Doble A; Gnanapragasam V; Warren A; Kastner C; Bratt O
BJU Int; 2017 May; 119(5):724-730. PubMed ID: 27488931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Serial Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer: Incremental Value.
Felker ER; Wu J; Natarajan S; Margolis DJ; Raman SS; Huang J; Dorey F; Marks LS
J Urol; 2016 May; 195(5):1421-1427. PubMed ID: 26674305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate can improve the predictive value of the urinary prostate cancer antigen 3 test in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and a previous negative biopsy.
Sciarra A; Panebianco V; Cattarino S; Busetto GM; De Berardinis E; Ciccariello M; Gentile V; Salciccia S
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11):1661-5. PubMed ID: 22564540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Detection of Prostate Cancer Harboring Adverse Pathological Features of Intraductal Carcinoma and Invasive Cribriform Carcinoma.
Prendeville S; Gertner M; Maganti M; Pintilie M; Perlis N; Toi A; Evans AJ; Finelli A; van der Kwast TH; Ghai S
J Urol; 2018 Jul; 200(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 29408568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of Prostate Biopsy with or without Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Detection: An Observational Cohort Study.
Bryant RJ; Hobbs CP; Eyre KS; Davies LC; Sullivan ME; Shields W; Sooriakumaran P; Verrill CL; Gleeson FV; MacPherson RE; Hamdy FC; Brewster SF
J Urol; 2019 Mar; 201(3):510-519. PubMed ID: 30266332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. High diagnostic ability of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to detect anterior prostate cancer missed by transrectal 12-core biopsy.
Komai Y; Numao N; Yoshida S; Matsuoka Y; Nakanishi Y; Ishii C; Koga F; Saito K; Masuda H; Fujii Y; Kawakami S; Kihara K
J Urol; 2013 Sep; 190(3):867-73. PubMed ID: 23542406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A Single Center Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging against Transperineal Prostate Mapping Biopsy: An Analysis of Men with Benign Histology and Insignificant Cancer following Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy.
Pal RP; Ahmad R; Trecartan S; Voss J; Ahmed S; Bazo A; Lloyd J; Walton TJ
J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):302-308. PubMed ID: 29477717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Final Analysis of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Surveillance Trial.
Doan P; Scheltema MJ; Amin A; Shnier R; Geboers B; Gondoputro W; Moses D; van Leeuwen PJ; Haynes AM; Matthews J; Brenner P; O'Neill G; Yuen C; Delprado W; Stricker P; Thompson J
J Urol; 2022 Nov; 208(5):1028-1036. PubMed ID: 35947521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The Efficacy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Risk Classification for Patients with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.
Recabal P; Assel M; Sjoberg DD; Lee D; Laudone VP; Touijer K; Eastham JA; Vargas HA; Coleman J; Ehdaie B
J Urol; 2016 Aug; 196(2):374-81. PubMed ID: 26920465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Diagnostic Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Fusion Targeted Biopsy to Detect Significant Prostate Cancer.
Hoffmann MA; Taymoorian K; Ruf C; Gerhards A; Leyendecker K; Stein T; Jakobs FM; Schreckenberger M
Anticancer Res; 2017 Dec; 37(12):6871-6877. PubMed ID: 29187467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy in a Consecutive Cohort of Men with No Previous Biopsy: Reduction of Over Detection through Improved Risk Stratification.
Mendhiratta N; Rosenkrantz AB; Meng X; Wysock JS; Fenstermaker M; Huang R; Deng FM; Melamed J; Zhou M; Huang WC; Lepor H; Taneja SS
J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1601-6. PubMed ID: 26100327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Combined Clinical Parameters and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Advanced Risk Modeling of Prostate Cancer-Patient-tailored Risk Stratification Can Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
Radtke JP; Wiesenfarth M; Kesch C; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Celik K; Distler F; Roth W; Wieczorek K; Stock C; Duensing S; Roethke MC; Teber D; Schlemmer HP; Hohenfellner M; Bonekamp D; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2017 Dec; 72(6):888-896. PubMed ID: 28400169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. PI-RADS Version 2 Category on 3 Tesla Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Oncologic Outcomes in Gleason 3 + 4 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy.
Faiena I; Salmasi A; Mendhiratta N; Markovic D; Ahuja P; Hsu W; Elashoff DA; Raman SS; Reiter RE
J Urol; 2019 Jan; 201(1):91-97. PubMed ID: 30142318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Multiparametric Ultrasound for Prostate Cancer Detection and Localization: Correlation of B-mode, Shear Wave Elastography and Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound with Radical Prostatectomy Specimens.
Mannaerts CK; Wildeboer RR; Remmers S; van Kollenburg RAA; Kajtazovic A; Hagemann J; Postema AW; van Sloun RJG; J Roobol M; Tilki D; Mischi M; Wijkstra H; Salomon G
J Urol; 2019 Dec; 202(6):1166-1173. PubMed ID: 31246546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Prostate Cancer Diagnostics Using a Combination of the Stockholm3 Blood Test and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Grönberg H; Eklund M; Picker W; Aly M; Jäderling F; Adolfsson J; Landquist M; Haug ES; Ström P; Carlsson S; Nordström T
Eur Urol; 2018 Dec; 74(6):722-728. PubMed ID: 30001824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37.
Lopci E; Saita A; Lazzeri M; Lughezzani G; Colombo P; Buffi NM; Hurle R; Marzo K; Peschechera R; Benetti A; Zandegiacomo S; Pasini L; Lista G; Cardone P; Castello A; Maffei D; Balzarini L; Chiti A; Guazzoni G; Casale P
J Urol; 2018 Jul; 200(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 29409824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen.
Hambrock T; Somford DM; Hoeks C; Bouwense SA; Huisman H; Yakar D; van Oort IM; Witjes JA; Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO
J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):520-7. PubMed ID: 20006859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer.
Somford DM; Hamoen EH; Fütterer JJ; van Basten JP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Vreuls W; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Kiemeney LA; Barentsz JO; Witjes JA
J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1728-34. PubMed ID: 23680307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Multiparametric 3T prostate magnetic resonance imaging to detect cancer: histopathological correlation using prostatectomy specimens processed in customized magnetic resonance imaging based molds.
Turkbey B; Mani H; Shah V; Rastinehad AR; Bernardo M; Pohida T; Pang Y; Daar D; Benjamin C; McKinney YL; Trivedi H; Chua C; Bratslavsky G; Shih JH; Linehan WM; Merino MJ; Choyke PL; Pinto PA
J Urol; 2011 Nov; 186(5):1818-24. PubMed ID: 21944089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
