BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31189402)

  • 1. Assessing the role of maternal race on the prediction of NICU admission by three growth charts: a cross-sectional study.
    Nahirney M; Chaput KH; Metcalfe A
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Apr; 34(8):1233-1240. PubMed ID: 31189402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Identification of the optimal growth charts for use in a preterm population: An Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study.
    Pritchard NL; Hiscock RJ; Lockie E; Permezel M; McGauren MFG; Kennedy AL; Green B; Walker SP; Lindquist AC
    PLoS Med; 2019 Oct; 16(10):e1002923. PubMed ID: 31584941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. INTERGROWTH-21st compared with GROW customized centiles in the detection of adverse perinatal outcomes at term.
    Pritchard N; Lindquist A; Siqueira IDA; Walker SP; Permezel M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Mar; 33(6):961-966. PubMed ID: 30372647
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of updated birth weight, length and head circumference charts by gestational age in China with the INTERGROWTH-21st NCSS charts: a population-based study.
    Zhang YQ; Li H; Zong XN; Wu HH
    World J Pediatr; 2023 Jan; 19(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 36306051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Determination of birth-weight centile thresholds associated with adverse perinatal outcomes using population, customised, and Intergrowth charts: A Swedish population-based cohort study.
    Vieira MC; Relph S; Persson M; Seed PT; Pasupathy D
    PLoS Med; 2019 Sep; 16(9):e1002902. PubMed ID: 31539391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Which growth standards should be used to identify large- and small-for-gestational age infants of mothers with type 1 diabetes? A pre-specified analysis of the CONCEPTT trial.
    Meek CL; Corcoy R; Asztalos E; Kusinski LC; López E; Feig DS; Murphy HR;
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Jan; 21(1):96. PubMed ID: 33514342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Differences When Classifying Small for Gestational Age Preterm Infants According to the Growth Chart Applied.
    Estañ-Capell J; Alarcón-Torres B; Miró-Pedro M; Martínez-Costa C
    Am J Perinatol; 2024 May; 41(S 01):e1212-e1219. PubMed ID: 36709759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of the performance of estimated fetal weight charts for the detection of small- and large-for-gestational age newborns with adverse outcomes: a French population-based study.
    Monier I; Ego A; Benachi A; Hocquette A; Blondel B; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
    BJOG; 2022 May; 129(6):938-948. PubMed ID: 34797926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of six birth-weight and estimated-fetal-weight standards for predicting adverse perinatal outcome: a 10-year nationwide population-based study.
    Choi SKY; Gordon A; Hilder L; Henry A; Hyett JA; Brew BK; Joseph F; Jorm L; Chambers GM
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 58(2):264-277. PubMed ID: 32672406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Adverse perinatal outcomes in immigrants: A ten-year population-based observational study and assessment of growth charts.
    Choi SKY; Henry A; Hilder L; Gordon A; Jorm L; Chambers GM
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2019 Nov; 33(6):421-432. PubMed ID: 31476081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing INTERGROWTH-21st Century and Hadlock growth standards to predict small for gestational age and short-term neonatal outcomes.
    Nwabuobi C; Odibo L; Camisasca-Lopina H; Leavitt K; Tuuli M; Odibo AO
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Jun; 33(11):1906-1912. PubMed ID: 30614334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. INTERGROWTH-21st vs customized birthweight standards for identification of perinatal mortality and morbidity.
    Anderson NH; Sadler LC; McKinlay CJD; McCowan LME
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):509.e1-509.e7. PubMed ID: 26546850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Customized vs population-based growth charts to identify neonates at risk of adverse outcome: systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of observational studies.
    Chiossi G; Pedroza C; Costantine MM; Truong VTT; Gargano G; Saade GR
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Aug; 50(2):156-166. PubMed ID: 27935148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Customized vs INTERGROWTH-21
    Francis A; Hugh O; Gardosi J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 218(2S):S692-S699. PubMed ID: 29422208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differential classification of infants in United States neonatal intensive care units for weight, length, and head circumference by United States and international growth curves.
    Ferguson AN; Olsen IE; Clark RH; Yockey BD; Boardman J; Biron K; Jannuzzo C; Waskiewicz D; Mendoza A; Lawson ML
    Ann Hum Biol; 2020 Sep; 47(6):564-571. PubMed ID: 32945183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Cross-Sectional Study Comparing the Efficacy of Various Growth Charts in Evaluating the Incidences of Small for Gestational Age and Large for Gestational Age at Birth Among Liveborn Neonates Delivered at a Tertiary Teaching Hospital.
    Singamala RR; Subramanian P; Chitgupikar SR
    Cureus; 2023 Apr; 15(4):e38058. PubMed ID: 37228563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of INTERGROWTH-21 and Fenton growth standards to assess size at birth and extrauterine growth in very preterm infants.
    Tuzun F; Yucesoy E; Baysal B; Kumral A; Duman N; Ozkan H
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2018 Sep; 31(17):2252-2257. PubMed ID: 28587527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of birth weight for gestational age charts and comparison with currently used charts: defining growth in the Polish population.
    Kajdy A; Modzelewski J; Filipecka-Tyczka D; Pokropek A; Rabijewski M
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2021 Sep; 34(18):2977-2984. PubMed ID: 31619090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Among Pregnant Individuals With Gestational Diabetes by Race and Ethnicity in the United States, 2014-2020.
    Venkatesh KK; Lynch CD; Powe CE; Costantine MM; Thung SF; Gabbe SG; Grobman WA; Landon MB
    JAMA; 2022 Apr; 327(14):1356-1367. PubMed ID: 35412565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of regional versus global growth charts for the classification of small-for-gestational age neonates.
    Anand P; Thomas D; Agarwal R; Thukral A; Deorari AK; Paul VK; Sankar MJ
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2023 Jan; 108(1):15-19. PubMed ID: 35551076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.