411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31189884)
1. ATR mediates cisplatin resistance in 3D-cultured breast cancer cells via translesion DNA synthesis modulation.
Gomes LR; Rocha CRR; Martins DJ; Fiore APZP; Kinker GS; Bruni-Cardoso A; Menck CFM
Cell Death Dis; 2019 Jun; 10(6):459. PubMed ID: 31189884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ZEB1 inhibition sensitizes cells to the ATR inhibitor VE-821 by abrogating epithelial-mesenchymal transition and enhancing DNA damage.
Song N; Jing W; Li C; Bai M; Cheng Y; Li H; Hou K; Li Y; Wang K; Li Z; Liu Y; Qu X; Che X
Cell Cycle; 2018; 17(5):595-604. PubMed ID: 29157079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Knockdown of REV3 synergizes with ATR inhibition to promote apoptosis induced by cisplatin in lung cancer cells.
Jiang HG; Chen P; Su JY; Wu M; Qian H; Wang Y; Li J
J Cell Physiol; 2017 Dec; 232(12):3433-3443. PubMed ID: 28075014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The identification of the ATR inhibitor VE-822 as a therapeutic strategy for enhancing cisplatin chemosensitivity in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
Shi Q; Shen LY; Dong B; Fu H; Kang XZ; Yang YB; Dai L; Yan WP; Xiong HC; Liang Z; Chen KN
Cancer Lett; 2018 Sep; 432():56-68. PubMed ID: 29890208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marek's Disease Virus Disables the ATR-Chk1 Pathway by Activating STAT3.
Lian X; Bao C; Li X; Zhang X; Chen H; Jung YS; Qian Y
J Virol; 2019 May; 93(9):. PubMed ID: 30787154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Abrogation of ATR function preferentially augments cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity in PTEN-deficient breast cancer cells.
Zhao JL; Yang J; Li K; Chen Y; Tang M; Zhu HL; Nie CL; Yuan Z; Zhao XY
Chem Biol Interact; 2023 Nov; 385():110740. PubMed ID: 37802411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. ATR-Chk1 signaling inhibition as a therapeutic strategy to enhance cisplatin chemosensitivity in urothelial bladder cancer.
Li CC; Yang JC; Lu MC; Lee CL; Peng CY; Hsu WY; Dai YH; Chang FR; Zhang DY; Wu WJ; Wu YC
Oncotarget; 2016 Jan; 7(2):1947-59. PubMed ID: 26657501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Co-inhibition of Pol η and ATR sensitizes cisplatin-resistant non-small cell lung cancer cells to cisplatin by impeding DNA damage repair.
Li XQ; Ren J; Chen P; Chen YJ; Wu M; Wu Y; Chen K; Li J
Acta Pharmacol Sin; 2018 Aug; 39(8):1359-1372. PubMed ID: 29849128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Synthetic Lethal Screen Identifies DNA Repair Pathways that Sensitize Cancer Cells to Combined ATR Inhibition and Cisplatin Treatments.
Mohni KN; Thompson PS; Luzwick JW; Glick GG; Pendleton CS; Lehmann BD; Pietenpol JA; Cortez D
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125482. PubMed ID: 25965342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ATR kinase inhibition sensitizes quiescent human cells to the lethal effects of cisplatin but increases mutagenesis.
Hutcherson RJ; Kemp MG
Mutat Res; 2019 Nov; 816-818():111678. PubMed ID: 31557599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. IGF-1R inhibition sensitizes breast cancer cells to ATM-related kinase (ATR) inhibitor and cisplatin.
O'Flanagan CH; O'Shea S; Lyons A; Fogarty FM; McCabe N; Kennedy RD; O'Connor R
Oncotarget; 2016 Aug; 7(35):56826-56841. PubMed ID: 27472395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional microenvironment confers enhanced sensitivity to doxorubicin by reducing p53-dependent induction of autophagy.
Gomes LR; Vessoni AT; Menck CF
Oncogene; 2015 Oct; 34(42):5329-40. PubMed ID: 25619836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiple DNA damage-dependent and DNA damage-independent stress responses define the outcome of ATR/Chk1 targeting in medulloblastoma cells.
Krüger K; Geist K; Stuhldreier F; Schumacher L; Blümel L; Remke M; Wesselborg S; Stork B; Klöcker N; Bormann S; Roos WP; Honnen S; Fritz G
Cancer Lett; 2018 Aug; 430():34-46. PubMed ID: 29753759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Targeting a non-oncogene addiction to the ATR/CHK1 axis for the treatment of small cell lung cancer.
Doerr F; George J; Schmitt A; Beleggia F; Rehkämper T; Hermann S; Walter V; Weber JP; Thomas RK; Wittersheim M; Büttner R; Persigehl T; Reinhardt HC
Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):15511. PubMed ID: 29138515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chk1 phosphorylated at serine345 is a predictor of early local recurrence and radio-resistance in breast cancer.
Alsubhi N; Middleton F; Abdel-Fatah TM; Stephens P; Doherty R; Arora A; Moseley PM; Chan SY; Aleskandarany MA; Green AR; Rakha EA; Ellis IO; Martin SG; Curtin NJ; Madhusudan S
Mol Oncol; 2016 Feb; 10(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 26459098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inhibition of ATR-dependent feedback activation of Chk1 sensitises cancer cells to Chk1 inhibitor monotherapy.
Massey AJ
Cancer Lett; 2016 Dec; 383(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 27693461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cisplatin resistance in non-small cell lung cancer cells is associated with an abrogation of cisplatin-induced G2/M cell cycle arrest.
Sarin N; Engel F; Kalayda GV; Mannewitz M; Cinatl J; Rothweiler F; Michaelis M; Saafan H; Ritter CA; Jaehde U; Frötschl R
PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181081. PubMed ID: 28746345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. WEE1 inhibition targets cell cycle checkpoints for triple negative breast cancers to overcome cisplatin resistance.
Zheng H; Shao F; Martin S; Xu X; Deng CX
Sci Rep; 2017 Mar; 7():43517. PubMed ID: 28262781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feedback regulation of methyl methanesulfonate and ultraviolet-sensitive gene clone 81 via ATM/Chk2 pathway contributes to the resistance of MCF-7 breast cancer cells to cisplatin.
Lv J; Qian Y; Ni X; Xu X; Dong X
Tumour Biol; 2017 Mar; 39(3):1010428317694307. PubMed ID: 28347251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of checkpoint responses triggered by DNA polymerase inhibition versus DNA damaging agents.
Liu JS; Kuo SR; Melendy T
Mutat Res; 2003 Nov; 532(1-2):215-26. PubMed ID: 14643438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
