These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31190402)

  • 1. Testing two variances for superiority/non-inferiority and equivalence: Using the exhaustion algorithm for sample size allocation with cost.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 May; 73(2):316-332. PubMed ID: 31190402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Unequal allocation of sample/event sizes with considerations of sampling cost for testing equality, non-inferiority/superiority, and equivalence of two Poisson rates.
    Luh WM; Guo JH
    Int J Biostat; 2024 May; 20(1):143-156. PubMed ID: 36583245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sample size planning with the cost constraint for testing superiority and equivalence of two independent groups.
    Guo JH; Chen HJ; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):439-61. PubMed ID: 20704777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sample size planning for the noninferiority or equivalence of a linear contrast with cost considerations.
    Luh WM; Guo JH
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Mar; 21(1):13-34. PubMed ID: 26121080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exact Power and Sample Size Calculations for the Two One-Sided Tests of Equivalence.
    Shieh G
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0162093. PubMed ID: 27598468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimum sample size allocation to minimize cost or maximize power for the two-sample trimmed mean test.
    Guo JH; Luh WM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 May; 62(Pt 2):283-98. PubMed ID: 18157920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wald tests for variance-adjusted equivalence assessment with normal endpoints.
    Chen YM; Weng YT; Dong X; Tsong Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2017; 27(2):308-316. PubMed ID: 27906607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Point-biserial correlation: Interval estimation, hypothesis testing, meta-analysis, and sample size determination.
    Bonett DG
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():113-144. PubMed ID: 31565811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A bootstrap test for comparing two variances: simulation of size and power in small samples.
    Sun J; Chernick MR; LaBudde RA
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Nov; 21(6):1079-93. PubMed ID: 22023677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of alternative approaches for difference, noninferiority, and equivalence testing of normal percentiles.
    Shieh G
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Mar; 20(1):59. PubMed ID: 32169043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using information from network meta-analyses to optimize the power and sample allocation of a subsequent trial with a new treatment.
    Hu D; Wang C; Ye F; O'Connor AM
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Nov; 22(1):299. PubMed ID: 36418960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of Sample Size by Bootstrap and by Formulas Based on Normal Distribution Assumption.
    Wang Z
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2019 Mar; 53(2):170-175. PubMed ID: 29807472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Approximate sample size formulas for the two-sample trimmed mean test with unequal variances.
    Luh WM; Guo JH
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):137-46. PubMed ID: 17535584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparative appraisal of two equivalence tests for multiple standardized effects.
    Shieh G
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Apr; 126():110-7. PubMed ID: 26777779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Study duration for three-arm non-inferiority survival trials designed for accrual by cohorts.
    Wu Y; Li Y; Hou Y; Li K; Zhou X
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):507-520. PubMed ID: 26994213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An approximate approach to sampling size determination for the equivalence hypothesis.
    Hsieh CY; Liu JP
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013 May; 23(3):526-38. PubMed ID: 23611193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size determinations for Welch's test in one-way heteroscedastic ANOVA.
    Jan SL; Shieh G
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Feb; 67(1):72-93. PubMed ID: 23316952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A modified Wald test for reference scaled assessment of analytical equivalence.
    Weng YT; Tsong Y; Shen M; Wang C
    J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(6):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30829123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robust tests of equivalence for k independent groups.
    Koh A; Cribbie R
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 Nov; 66(3):426-34. PubMed ID: 23043500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Design and semiparametric analysis of non-inferiority trials with active and placebo control for censored time-to-event data.
    Kombrink K; Munk A; Friede T
    Stat Med; 2013 Aug; 32(18):3055-66. PubMed ID: 23508697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.