These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31191368)
1. Is the Clinical Version of the Iowa Gambling Task Relevant for Assessing Choice Behavior in Cases of Internet Addiction? Lin CH; Wang CC; Sun JH; Ko CH; Chiu YC Front Psychiatry; 2019; 10():232. PubMed ID: 31191368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reexamining the validity and reliability of the clinical version of the iowa gambling task: evidence from a normal subject group. Lin CH; Song TJ; Chen YY; Lee WK; Chiu YC Front Psychol; 2013; 4():220. PubMed ID: 23755026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mirrored prominent deck B phenomenon: frequent small losses override infrequent large gains in the inverted Iowa Gambling Task. Lin CH; Song TJ; Lin YK; Chiu YC PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e47202. PubMed ID: 23091612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Prominent Deck B Phenomenon in Schizophrenia: An Empirical Study on Iowa Gambling Task. Xu M; Lee WK; Ko CH; Chiu YC; Lin CH Front Psychol; 2021; 12():619855. PubMed ID: 34539474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The adaptive decision-making, risky decision, and decision-making style of Internet gaming disorder. Ko CH; Wang PW; Liu TL; Chen CS; Yen CF; Yen JY Eur Psychiatry; 2017 Jul; 44():189-197. PubMed ID: 28646731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Discounting delayed monetary rewards and decision making in behavioral addictions - A comparison between patients with gambling disorder and internet gaming disorder. Wölfling K; Duven E; Wejbera M; Beutel ME; Müller KW Addict Behav; 2020 Sep; 108():106446. PubMed ID: 32408114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is deck C an advantageous deck in the Iowa Gambling Task? Chiu YC; Lin CH Behav Brain Funct; 2007 Aug; 3():37. PubMed ID: 17683599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Decision-making of Prefrontal Patients with the Iowa Gambling Task: Unexpected Spared Performances and Preliminary Evidence for the Need of Alternative Measures. Besnard J; Allain P; Aubin G; Chauviré V; Etcharry-Bouyx F; Le Gall D Clin Neuropsychol; 2015; 29(4):509-21. PubMed ID: 26053240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Immediate gain is long-term loss: Are there foresighted decision makers in the Iowa Gambling Task? Chiu YC; Lin CH; Huang JT; Lin S; Lee PL; Hsieh JC Behav Brain Funct; 2008 Mar; 4():13. PubMed ID: 18353176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is deck B a disadvantageous deck in the Iowa Gambling Task? Lin CH; Chiu YC; Lee PL; Hsieh JC Behav Brain Funct; 2007 Mar; 3():16. PubMed ID: 17362508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Striatum morphometry is associated with cognitive control deficits and symptom severity in internet gaming disorder. Cai C; Yuan K; Yin J; Feng D; Bi Y; Li Y; Yu D; Jin C; Qin W; Tian J Brain Imaging Behav; 2016 Mar; 10(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 25720356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Recollecting Cross-Cultural Evidences: Are Decision Makers Really Foresighted in Iowa Gambling Task? Lee WK; Lin CJ; Liu LH; Lin CH; Chiu YC Front Psychol; 2020; 11():537219. PubMed ID: 33408659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Underlying decision making processes on Iowa Gambling Task. Kumar R; Janakiprasad Kumar K; Benegal V Asian J Psychiatr; 2019 Jan; 39():63-69. PubMed ID: 30586668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are normal decision-makers sensitive to changes in value contrast under uncertainty? Evidence from the Iowa Gambling Task. Lee WK; Su YA; Song TJ; Chiu YC; Lin CH PLoS One; 2014; 9(7):e101878. PubMed ID: 25036094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dissociable neural processes during risky decision-making in individuals with Internet-gaming disorder. Liu L; Xue G; Potenza MN; Zhang JT; Yao YW; Xia CC; Lan J; Ma SS; Fang XY Neuroimage Clin; 2017; 14():741-749. PubMed ID: 28413776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Iowa gambling task: there is more to consider than long-term outcome. Using a linear equation model to disentangle the impact of outcome and frequency of gains and losses. Horstmann A; Villringer A; Neumann J Front Neurosci; 2012; 6():61. PubMed ID: 22593730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of the Arabic Version of the Internet Gaming Disorder-20 Test. Hawi NS; Samaha M Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2017 Apr; 20(4):268-272. PubMed ID: 28394210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The development and psychometric evaluation of the Internet Disorder Scale (IDS-15). Pontes HM; Griffiths MD Addict Behav; 2017 Jan; 64():261-268. PubMed ID: 26410796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Established risk factors for addiction fail to discriminate between healthy gamers and gamers endorsing DSM-5 Internet gaming disorder. Deleuze J; Nuyens F; Rochat L; Rothen S; Maurage P; Billieux J J Behav Addict; 2017 Dec; 6(4):516-524. PubMed ID: 29130328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neurobiological correlates of internet gaming disorder: Similarities to pathological gambling. Fauth-Bühler M; Mann K Addict Behav; 2017 Jan; 64():349-356. PubMed ID: 26621112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]