These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31192645)

  • 1. Developmental differences in children's learning and use of forensic ground rules during an interview about an experienced event.
    Brown DA; Lewis CN; Lamb ME; Gwynne J; Kitto O; Stairmand M
    Dev Psychol; 2019 Aug; 55(8):1626-1639. PubMed ID: 31192645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effects of Practice on Children's Ability to Apply Ground Rules in a Narrative Interview.
    Danby MC; Brubacher SP; Sharman SJ; Powell MB
    Behav Sci Law; 2015 Aug; 33(4):446-58. PubMed ID: 26294382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Children's performance on ground rules questions: implications for forensic interviewing.
    Dickinson JJ; Brubacher SP; Poole DA
    Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 25642973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influences of delay and severity of intellectual disability on event memory in children.
    Brown DA; Lewis CN; Lamb ME; Stephens E
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2012 Oct; 80(5):829-41. PubMed ID: 22799269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Don't know responding in young maltreated children: The effects of wh- questions type and enhanced interview instructions.
    McWilliams K; Williams S; Stolzenberg SN; Evans AD; Lyon TD
    Law Hum Behav; 2021 Apr; 45(2):124-137. PubMed ID: 34110874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An examination of "don't know" responses in forensic interviews with children.
    Earhart B; La Rooy DJ; Brubacher SP; Lamb ME
    Behav Sci Law; 2014; 32(6):746-61. PubMed ID: 25424612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of promising to tell the truth, the putative confession, and recall and recognition questions on maltreated and non-maltreated children's disclosure of a minor transgression.
    Quas JA; Stolzenberg SN; Lyon TD
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Feb; 166():266-279. PubMed ID: 28950167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Helping children correctly say "I don't know" to unanswerable questions.
    Waterman AH; Blades M
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Dec; 17(4):396-405. PubMed ID: 22059954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Investigative Interviewing of Aboriginal Children in Cases of Suspected Sexual Abuse.
    Hamilton G; Brubacher SP; Powell MB
    J Child Sex Abus; 2016; 25(4):363-81. PubMed ID: 27266534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Children's disclosures of sexual abuse: learning from direct inquiry.
    Schaeffer P; Leventhal JM; Asnes AG
    Child Abuse Negl; 2011 May; 35(5):343-52. PubMed ID: 21620161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A meta-analysis of differences in children's reports of single and repeated events.
    Woiwod DM; Fitzgerald RJ; Sheahan CL; Price HL; Connolly DA
    Law Hum Behav; 2019 Feb; 43(1):99-116. PubMed ID: 30570277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Judges' delivery of ground rules to child witnesses in Australian courts.
    Earhart B; Brubacher SP; Powell MB; Westera NJ; Goodman-Delahunty J
    Child Abuse Negl; 2017 Dec; 74():62-72. PubMed ID: 28882320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of intellectual disability on children's recall of an event across different question types.
    Agnew SE; Powell MB
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Jun; 28(3):273-94. PubMed ID: 15264447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of Guiding Ground Rules and Individual Differences on the Accuracy of Children's Free Recall and Suggestibility.
    Lee S; Chung HJ
    J Child Sex Abus; 2023; 32(7):829-844. PubMed ID: 37753948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Children's event reports: factors affecting responses to repeated questions in vignette scenarios and event recall interviews.
    Howie P; Nash L; Kurukulasuriya N; Bowman A
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2012 Nov; 30(Pt 4):550-68. PubMed ID: 23039332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of Interviewer Support on Children's Memory and Suggestibility: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Experimental Research.
    Saywitz KJ; Wells CR; Larson RP; Hobbs SD
    Trauma Violence Abuse; 2019 Jan; 20(1):22-39. PubMed ID: 30803408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nearly 4 years after an event: children's eyewitness memory and adults' perceptions of children's accuracy.
    Goodman GS; Batterman-Faunce JM; Schaaf JM; Kenney R
    Child Abuse Negl; 2002 Aug; 26(8):849-84. PubMed ID: 12363335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preserving the Past: An Early Interview Improves Delayed Event Memory in Children With Intellectual Disabilities.
    Brown DA; Lewis CN; Lamb ME
    Child Dev; 2015 Jul; 86(4):1031-1047. PubMed ID: 25876042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of question repetition within interviews on young children's eyewitness recall.
    Krähenbühl S; Blades M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 May; 94(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 16438980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Setting the Ground Rules: Use and Practice of Ground Rules in Child Forensic Interviews.
    Fessinger MB; McWilliams K; Bakth FN; Lyon TD
    Child Maltreat; 2021 Feb; 26(1):126-132. PubMed ID: 32208866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.