198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31192651)
1. "What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research": Correction to Stanley, Carter, and Doucouliagos (2018).
Psychol Bull; 2019 Jul; 145(7):764. PubMed ID: 31192651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What meta-analyses reveal about the replicability of psychological research.
Stanley TD; Carter EC; Doucouliagos H
Psychol Bull; 2018 Dec; 144(12):1325-1346. PubMed ID: 30321017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology.
Yang Y; Sánchez-Tójar A; O'Dea RE; Noble DWA; Koricheva J; Jennions MD; Parker TH; Lagisz M; Nakagawa S
BMC Biol; 2023 Apr; 21(1):71. PubMed ID: 37013585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. "Journal article reporting standards for quantitative research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board Task Force Report": Correction to Appelbaum et al. (2018).
Am Psychol; 2018 Oct; 73(7):947. PubMed ID: 30284901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. "Replicability and other features of a high-quality science: Toward a balanced and empirical approach": Correction to Finkel et al. (2017).
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Nov; 113(5):768. PubMed ID: 29016166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Meta-Meta-Analysis: Empirical Review of Statistical Power, Type I Error Rates, Effect Sizes, and Model Selection of Meta-Analyses Published in Psychology.
Cafri G; Kromrey JD; Brannick MT
Multivariate Behav Res; 2010 Mar; 45(2):239-70. PubMed ID: 26760285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. "Retrieval potentiates new learning: A theoretical and meta-analytic review": Correction to Chan, Meissner, and Davis (2018).
Psychol Bull; 2020 Dec; 146(12):1202. PubMed ID: 33030908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. "The relationship between religiousness and health among sexual minorities: A meta-analysis": Correction to Lefevor et al. (2021).
Psychol Bull; 2021 Jul; 147(7):748. PubMed ID: 34855430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing heterogeneity and power in replications of psychological experiments.
Schauer JM; Hedges LV
Psychol Bull; 2020 Aug; 146(8):701-719. PubMed ID: 32271029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Replication concerns in sports and exercise science: a narrative review of selected methodological issues in the field.
Mesquida C; Murphy J; Lakens D; Warne J
R Soc Open Sci; 2022 Dec; 9(12):220946. PubMed ID: 36533197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Retrospective median power, false positive meta-analysis and large-scale replication.
Stanley TD; Doucouliagos H; Ioannidis JPA
Res Synth Methods; 2022 Jan; 13(1):88-108. PubMed ID: 34628722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. "Meta-analyses and P-curves support robust cycle shifts in women's mate preferences: Reply to Wood and Carden (2014) and Harris, Pashler, and Mickes (2014)": Correction to Gildersleeve, Haselton, and Fales (2014).
Psychol Bull; 2017 Nov; 143(11):iii. PubMed ID: 29048180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. "Falsifiability is not optional": Correction to LeBel et al. (2017).
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Nov; 113(5):696. PubMed ID: 29016165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correction to "Tell it like it is: When politically incorrect language promotes authenticity" by Rosenblum et al. (2020).
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2024 Feb; 126(2):212. PubMed ID: 38466337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An N-pact factor for clinical psychological research.
Reardon KW; Smack AJ; Herzhoff K; Tackett JL
J Abnorm Psychol; 2019 Aug; 128(6):493-499. PubMed ID: 31368728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Publication bias, statistical power and reporting practices in the Journal of Sports Sciences: potential barriers to replicability.
Mesquida C; Murphy J; Lakens D; Warne J
J Sports Sci; 2023 Sep; 41(16):1507-1517. PubMed ID: 38018365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of publication bias on the Q test and assessment of heterogeneity.
Augusteijn HEM; van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM
Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):116-134. PubMed ID: 30489099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. "Health Psychology adopts Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines": Correction to Freedland (2021).
Health Psychol; 2021 Jul; 40(7):vi. PubMed ID: 34435792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. "A review and meta-analysis of age-based stereotype threat: Negative stereotypes, not facts, do the damage": Correction to Lamont, Swift, and Abrams (2015).
Psychol Aging; 2018 Aug; 33(5):vi. PubMed ID: 30091626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
