These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31192679)

  • 1. Theoretical note: Exploring Luce's (1963) low-threshold model applied to recognition memory.
    McAdoo RM; Gronlund SD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Feb; 46(2):247-256. PubMed ID: 31192679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Signal detection and threshold modeling of confidence-rating ROCs: A critical test with minimal assumptions.
    Kellen D; Klauer KC
    Psychol Rev; 2015 Jul; 122(3):542-57. PubMed ID: 26120910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ensemble coding of memory strength in recognition tests.
    Dubé C; Tong K; Westfall H; Bauer E
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jul; 47(5):936-953. PubMed ID: 30919277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrete-state versus continuous models of the confidence-accuracy relationship in recognition memory.
    Delay CG; Wixted JT
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Apr; 28(2):556-564. PubMed ID: 33111256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. One mirror effect: The regularities of recognition memory.
    Hilford A; Glanzer M; Kim K; Maloney LT
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Feb; 47(2):266-278. PubMed ID: 30288686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Benefits of multinomial processing tree models with discrete and continuous variables in memory research: an alternative modeling proposal to Juola et al. (2019).
    Gutkin A; Suero M; Botella J; Juola JF
    Mem Cognit; 2024 May; 52(4):793-825. PubMed ID: 38177559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How to say no in recognition tests of visual working memory: Testing unidimensional and two-dimensional models with continuous or discrete memory states.
    Lin HY; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Dec; 45(12):2123-2146. PubMed ID: 30883171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The unequal variance signal-detection model of recognition memory: Investigating the encoding variability hypothesis.
    Spanton RW; Berry CJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Aug; 73(8):1242-1260. PubMed ID: 31986982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The statistical accuracy and theoretical status of discrete-state MPT models: reply to Batchelder and Alexander (2013).
    Dubé C; Rotello CM; Pazzaglia AM
    Psychol Bull; 2013 Nov; 139(6):1213-20. PubMed ID: 24188420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrete-state models: comment on Pazzaglia, Dube, and Rotello (2013).
    Batchelder WH; Alexander GE
    Psychol Bull; 2013 Nov; 139(6):1204-12. PubMed ID: 24188419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A critical comparison of discrete-state and continuous models of recognition memory: implications for recognition and beyond.
    Pazzaglia AM; Dube C; Rotello CM
    Psychol Bull; 2013 Nov; 139(6):1173-203. PubMed ID: 23731174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Where is the criterion noise in recognition? (Almost) everyplace you look: comment on Kellen, Klauer, and Singmann (2012).
    Benjamin AS
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Jul; 120(3):720-6. PubMed ID: 23915089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A dynamic model of deciding not to choose.
    Reynolds A; Garton R; Kvam P; Sauer J; Osth AF; Heathcote A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2021 Jan; 150(1):42-66. PubMed ID: 32551778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement models for visual working memory-A factorial model comparison.
    Oberauer K
    Psychol Rev; 2023 Apr; 130(3):841-852. PubMed ID: 34570523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Responses improve the accuracy of confidence judgements in memory tasks.
    Siedlecka M; Skóra Z; Paulewicz B; Fijałkowska S; Timmermans B; Wierzchoń M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):712-723. PubMed ID: 29999396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychophysical scaling reveals a unified theory of visual memory strength.
    Schurgin MW; Wixted JT; Brady TF
    Nat Hum Behav; 2020 Nov; 4(11):1156-1172. PubMed ID: 32895546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Models of recognition, repetition priming, and fluency: exploring a new framework.
    Berry CJ; Shanks DR; Speekenbrink M; Henson RN
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Jan; 119(1):40-79. PubMed ID: 22022831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of metacognition in recognition of the content of statistical learning.
    Ordin M; Polyanskaya L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Feb; 28(1):333-340. PubMed ID: 32869190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A strength-based mirror effect persists even when criterion shifts are unlikely.
    Koop GJ; Criss AH; Pardini AM
    Mem Cognit; 2019 May; 47(4):842-854. PubMed ID: 30790209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Independent recollection-familiarity ratings: Similar effects of levels-of-processing whether amount or confidence is rated.
    Williams HL; Bodner GE
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2019 Jun; 73(2):94-99. PubMed ID: 30802078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.