BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31192805)

  • 1. Is It Safe to Ask the Questions That Matter Most to Me? Observations From a Female Residency Applicant.
    Weaver AN; Willett LL
    Acad Med; 2019 Nov; 94(11):1635-1637. PubMed ID: 31192805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recent trends in applicants and the matching process for the integrated plastic surgery match.
    Super N; Tieman J; Boucher K; Rockwell WB; Agarwal JP
    Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Oct; 71(4):406-9. PubMed ID: 23407248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. International Medical Graduates and the Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Match.
    Lujan-Hernandez J; Ibrahim MM; Taub PJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Feb; 82(2):229-232. PubMed ID: 30570561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Have We Come as Far as We Had Hoped? Discrimination in the Residency Interview.
    Hessel K; DiPasco P; Kilgore L; Shelley C; Perry A; Wagner J
    J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(6):939-945. PubMed ID: 28483440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgical Residency Recruitment-Opportunities for Improvement.
    Joshi ART; Vargo D; Mathis A; Love JN; Dhir T; Termuhlen PM
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(6):e104-e110. PubMed ID: 27886970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors That Affect Medical Students' Perception and Impression of a Plastic Surgery Program: The Role of Elective Rotations and Interviews.
    Zuo KJ; Retrouvey H; Wanzel KR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2019 Feb; 82(2):224-228. PubMed ID: 29916893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Residency Placement Fever: Is It Time for a Reevaluation?
    Gruppuso PA; Adashi EY
    Acad Med; 2017 Jul; 92(7):923-926. PubMed ID: 27805954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcome analysis of factors impacting the plastic surgery match.
    Wood JS; David LR
    Ann Plast Surg; 2010 Jun; 64(6):770-4. PubMed ID: 20489406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Examination of Nondesignated Preliminary Surgery Residents Recruited Since the Inception of Supplementary Offer and Acceptance Program: Lessons Learned From a Large Academic Program.
    Albuja-Cruz M; Travis C; Benge M; Caufield B; Nehler M
    J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(2):294-298. PubMed ID: 28886935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applicant Perspectives on the Otolaryngology Residency Application Process.
    Ward M; Pingree C; Laury AM; Bowe SN
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Aug; 143(8):782-787. PubMed ID: 28542682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Textual Analysis of General Surgery Residency Personal Statements: Topics and Gender Differences.
    Ostapenko L; Schonhardt-Bailey C; Sublette JW; Smink DS; Osman NY
    J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):573-581. PubMed ID: 29102557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Correlation of Behavioral Interviewing Performance With Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Applicant Characteristics☆?>.
    Breitkopf DM; Vaughan LE; Hopkins MR
    J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(6):954-958. PubMed ID: 27321984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of the 1990-2007 neurosurgery residency match: does applicant gender affect neurosurgery match outcome?
    Durham SR; Donaldson K; Grady MS; Benzil DL
    J Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 129(2):282-289. PubMed ID: 29882698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selecting Residents for Predetermined Factors Identified and Thought to be Important for Work Performance and Satisfaction: A Methodology.
    McGuire KJ; Sparks MB; Gitajn IL; Henderson ER; Jevsevar DS; Paddock NG; Coe MP
    J Surg Educ; 2019; 76(4):949-961. PubMed ID: 30846348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rethinking the Match: A Proposal for Modern Matchmaking.
    Ray C; Bishop SE; Dow AW
    Acad Med; 2018 Jan; 93(1):45-47. PubMed ID: 28658017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applicant perceptions of new selection systems are a function of their performance in the selection procedure.
    Gardner AK; Dunkin BJ
    Am J Surg; 2019 Feb; 217(2):272-275. PubMed ID: 30297126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Residency selection: do the perceptions of US programme directors and applicants match?
    Go PH; Klaassen Z; Chamberlain RS
    Med Educ; 2012 May; 46(5):491-500. PubMed ID: 22515757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How competitive is the match for radiology residency? Present view and historical perspective.
    Chen JY; Heller MT
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 May; 11(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 24793041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Applicant Characteristics Associated With Selection for Ranking at Independent Surgery Residency Programs.
    Dort JM; Trickey AW; Kallies KJ; Joshi AR; Sidwell RA; Jarman BT
    J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(6):e123-9. PubMed ID: 26073713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Residency characteristics that matter most to plastic surgery applicants: a multi-institutional analysis and review of the literature.
    Sinno S; Mehta K; Squitieri L; Ranganathan K; Koeckert MS; Patel A; Saadeh PB; Thanik V
    Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Jun; 74(6):713-7. PubMed ID: 25969975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.