These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
10. Evaluating the Effect of a Mechanical Adjunct to Improve the Installation of Child Restraint Systems to Vehicles. Mirman JH; Seifert SJ; Zonfrillo MR; Metzger K; Durbin DR; Arbogast KB Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S24-31. PubMed ID: 26436238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. LATCH (Lower Anchors and Tethers for CHildren) usability in school buses and passenger vehicles. Rudin-Brown CM; Scipione A; Armstrong J; Lai G; Salway A; Kumagai J Traffic Inj Prev; 2008 Oct; 9(5):472-82. PubMed ID: 18836959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of child restraint lower attachment method on protection offered by forward facing child restraint systems in oblique loading conditions. Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S139-S145. PubMed ID: 29584498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Observed LATCH use and misuse characteristics of child restraint systems in seven states. Decina LE; Lococo KH J Safety Res; 2007; 38(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 17617236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Consumer usability of flexible vs. rigid lower anchor hardware in infant child restraint system (CRS) installations. Mansfield JA Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(sup1):S105-S110. PubMed ID: 35775879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of top tethers with forward-facing child restraints: observations and driver interviews. Eichelberger AH; Decina LE; Jermakian JS; McCartt AT J Safety Res; 2014 Feb; 48():71-6. PubMed ID: 24529094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Investigation of Child Restraint System (CRS) Compatibility in the Vehicle Seat Environment. Bing JA; Bolte JH; Agnew AM Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S1-8. PubMed ID: 26436217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Influence of Enhanced Side Impact Protection on Kinematics and Injury Measures of Far- or Center-Seated Children in Forward-Facing Child Restraints. Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S9-S15. PubMed ID: 26436248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of LATCH vs. non-LATCH installations for boosters in frontal impacts. Mansfield JA; Baker GH; Ramachandra R; Bolte JH Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(sup1):S93-S98. PubMed ID: 34379543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Protection of children in forward-facing child restraint systems during oblique side impact sled tests: Intrusion and tether effects. Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Kim J; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Sep; 17 Suppl 1():156-62. PubMed ID: 27586117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of LATCH versus Available Seatbelt Installation of Rear Facing Child Restraint Systems on Head Injury Criteria for 6 Month Old Infants in Rear End Collisions. Williams JR; O'Donel CA; Leiss PJ Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S16-23. PubMed ID: 26436226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]