BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

639 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31196734)

  • 1. Multiple rounds of one sample versus two sample faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: a population-based study.
    Schreuders EH; Grobbee EJ; Nieuwenburg SAV; Kapidzic A; van Roon AHC; van Vuuren AJ; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spijker WWJ; Izelaar K; Bruno MJ; Kuipers EJ; Spaander MCW
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Aug; 4(8):622-631. PubMed ID: 31196734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of two faecal immunochemical tests for the detection of advanced neoplasia at different positivity thresholds: a cross-sectional study of the Dutch national colorectal cancer screening programme.
    de Klerk CM; Wieten E; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Bossuyt PM; Spaander MC; Dekker E
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2019 Feb; 4(2):111-118. PubMed ID: 30497962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomised comparison of two faecal immunochemical tests in population-based colorectal cancer screening.
    Grobbee EJ; van der Vlugt M; van Vuuren AJ; Stroobants AK; Mundt MW; Spijker WJ; Bongers EJC; Kuipers EJ; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Bossuyt PM; Dekker E; Spaander MCW
    Gut; 2017 Nov; 66(11):1975-1982. PubMed ID: 27507905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Single CT colonography versus three rounds of faecal immunochemical test for population-based screening of colorectal cancer (SAVE): a randomised controlled trial.
    Sali L; Ventura L; Mascalchi M; Falchini M; Mallardi B; Carozzi F; Milani S; Zappa M; Grazzini G; Mantellini P
    Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Nov; 7(11):1016-1023. PubMed ID: 36116454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Faecal immunochemical tests versus colonoscopy for post-polypectomy surveillance: an accuracy, acceptability and economic study.
    Atkin W; Cross AJ; Kralj-Hans I; MacRae E; Piggott C; Pearson S; Wooldrage K; Brown J; Lucas F; Prendergast A; Marchevsky N; Patel B; Pack K; Howe R; Skrobanski H; Kerrison R; Swart N; Snowball J; Duffy SW; Morris S; von Wagner C; Halloran S
    Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jan; 23(1):1-84. PubMed ID: 30618357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Faecal haemoglobin concentration among subjects with negative FIT results is associated with the detection rate of neoplasia at subsequent rounds: a prospective study in the context of population based screening programmes in Italy.
    Senore C; Zappa M; Campari C; Crotta S; Armaroli P; Arrigoni A; Cassoni P; Colla R; Fracchia M; Gili F; Grazzini G; Lolli R; Menozzi P; Orione L; Polizzi S; Rapi S; Riggi E; Rubeca T; Sassatelli R; Visioli C; Segnan N
    Gut; 2020 Mar; 69(3):523-530. PubMed ID: 31455608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Equivalent Accuracy of 2 Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Tests in Detecting Advanced Neoplasia in an Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.
    Wieten E; de Klerk CM; van der Steen A; Ramakers CR; Kuipers EJ; Hansen BE; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Bossuyt PM; Dekker E; Spaander MCW
    Gastroenterology; 2018 Nov; 155(5):1392-1399.e5. PubMed ID: 30055170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Attendance and diagnostic yield of repeated two-sample faecal immunochemical test screening for colorectal cancer.
    Kapidzic A; van Roon AH; van Leerdam ME; van Vuuren AJ; van Ballegooijen M; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spijker W; Izelaar K; Hol L; Kuipers EJ
    Gut; 2017 Jan; 66(1):118-123. PubMed ID: 26370109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interval Colorectal Cancer Incidence Among Subjects Undergoing Multiple Rounds of Fecal Immunochemical Testing.
    van der Vlugt M; Grobbee EJ; Bossuyt PMM; Bos A; Bongers E; Spijker W; Kuipers EJ; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Spaander MCW; Dekker E
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Aug; 153(2):439-447.e2. PubMed ID: 28483499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term performance of colorectal cancerscreening programmes based on the faecal immunochemical test.
    Zorzi M; Hassan C; Capodaglio G; Fedato C; Montaguti A; Turrin A; Rosano A; Monetti D; Stocco C; Baracco S; Russo F; Repici A; Rugge M
    Gut; 2018 Dec; 67(12):2124-2130. PubMed ID: 29101260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparative effectiveness trial of two faecal immunochemical tests for haemoglobin (FIT). Assessment of test performance and adherence in a single round of a population-based screening programme for colorectal cancer.
    Passamonti B; Malaspina M; Fraser CG; Tintori B; Carlani A; D'Angelo V; Galeazzi P; Di Dato E; Mariotti L; Bulletti S; D'Amico MR; Gustinucci D; Martinelli N; Spita N; Cesarini E; Rubeca T; Giaimo M; Segnan N; Senore C
    Gut; 2018 Mar; 67(3):485-496. PubMed ID: 27974550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals.
    Grobbee EJ; Wisse PHA; Schreuders EH; van Roon A; van Dam L; Zauber AG; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Bramer W; Berhane S; Deeks JJ; Steyerberg EW; van Leerdam ME; Spaander MC; Kuipers EJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Jun; 6(6):CD009276. PubMed ID: 35665911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic Yield of One-Time Colonoscopy vs One-Time Flexible Sigmoidoscopy vs Multiple Rounds of Mailed Fecal Immunohistochemical Tests in Colorectal Cancer Screening.
    Grobbee EJ; van der Vlugt M; van Vuuren AJ; Stroobants AK; Mallant-Hent RC; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Bossuyt PMM; Kuipers EJ; Dekker E; Spaander MCW
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Mar; 18(3):667-675.e1. PubMed ID: 31419575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attendance and yield over three rounds of population-based fecal immunochemical test screening.
    Kapidzic A; Grobbee EJ; Hol L; van Roon AH; van Vuuren AJ; Spijker W; Izelaar K; van Ballegooijen M; Kuipers EJ; van Leerdam ME
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Aug; 109(8):1257-64. PubMed ID: 24980879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Random comparison of repeated faecal immunochemical testing at different intervals for population-based colorectal cancer screening.
    van Roon AH; Goede SL; van Ballegooijen M; van Vuuren AJ; Looman CW; Biermann K; Reijerink JC; Mannetje H'; van der Togt AC; Habbema JD; van Leerdam ME; Kuipers EJ
    Gut; 2013 Mar; 62(3):409-15. PubMed ID: 22387523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Faecal haemoglobin can define risk of colorectal neoplasia at surveillance colonoscopy in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer.
    Digby J; Cleary S; Gray L; Datt P; Goudie DR; Steele RJC; Strachan JA; Humphries A; Fraser CG; Mowat C
    United European Gastroenterol J; 2020 Jun; 8(5):559-566. PubMed ID: 32213041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of Increasing Screening Age and Fecal Hemoglobin Cutoff Concentrations in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program.
    Wieten E; Schreuders EH; Nieuwenburg SA; Hansen BE; Lansdorp-Vogelaar I; Kuipers EJ; Bruno MJ; Spaander MC
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Dec; 14(12):1771-1777. PubMed ID: 27567693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sustained participation, colonoscopy uptake and adenoma detection rates over two rounds of the Tallaght-Trinity College colorectal cancer screening programme with the faecal immunological test.
    McNamara D; Leen R; Seng-Lee C; Shearer N; Crotty P; Neary P; Walsh P; Boran G; O'Morain C
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Dec; 26(12):1415-21. PubMed ID: 25244415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Population-based colorectal cancer screening programmes using a faecal immunochemical test: should faecal haemoglobin cut-offs differ by age and sex?
    Arana-Arri E; Idigoras I; Uranga B; Pérez R; Irurzun A; Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea I; Fraser CG; Portillo I;
    BMC Cancer; 2017 Aug; 17(1):577. PubMed ID: 28851318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Faecal immunochemical tests to triage patients with lower abdominal symptoms for suspected colorectal cancer referrals in primary care: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Westwood M; Corro Ramos I; Lang S; Luyendijk M; Zaim R; Stirk L; Al M; Armstrong N; Kleijnen J
    Health Technol Assess; 2017 May; 21(33):1-234. PubMed ID: 28643629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.