These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31197841)

  • 21. Princeton_TIGRESS 2.0: High refinement consistency and net gains through support vector machines and molecular dynamics in double-blind predictions during the CASP11 experiment.
    Khoury GA; Smadbeck J; Kieslich CA; Koskosidis AJ; Guzman YA; Tamamis P; Floudas CA
    Proteins; 2017 Jun; 85(6):1078-1098. PubMed ID: 28241391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Completion and refinement of 3-D homology models with restricted molecular dynamics: application to targets 47, 58, and 111 in the CASP modeling competition and posterior analysis.
    Flohil JA; Vriend G; Berendsen HJ
    Proteins; 2002 Sep; 48(4):593-604. PubMed ID: 12211026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Protein structure prediction using sparse NOE and RDC restraints with Rosetta in CASP13.
    Kuenze G; Meiler J
    Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1341-1350. PubMed ID: 31292988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Can molecular dynamics simulations provide high-resolution refinement of protein structure?
    Chen J; Brooks CL
    Proteins; 2007 Jun; 67(4):922-30. PubMed ID: 17373704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of the utility of contact-based restraints in accelerating the prediction of protein structure using molecular dynamics simulations.
    Raval A; Piana S; Eastwood MP; Shaw DE
    Protein Sci; 2016 Jan; 25(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 26266489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Physics-based protein structure refinement through multiple molecular dynamics trajectories and structure averaging.
    Mirjalili V; Noyes K; Feig M
    Proteins; 2014 Feb; 82 Suppl 2(0 2):196-207. PubMed ID: 23737254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sampling of near-native protein conformations during protein structure refinement using a coarse-grained model, normal modes, and molecular dynamics simulations.
    Stumpff-Kane AW; Maksimiak K; Lee MS; Feig M
    Proteins; 2008 Mar; 70(4):1345-56. PubMed ID: 17876825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of the UNRES force field in template-assisted prediction of protein structures and the refinement of server models: Test with CASP12 targets.
    Karczyńska A; Mozolewska MA; Krupa P; Giełdoń A; Bojarski KK; Zaborowski B; Liwo A; Ślusarz R; Ślusarz M; Lee J; Joo K; Czaplewski C
    J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Aug; 83():92-99. PubMed ID: 29860162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A further leap of improvement in tertiary structure prediction in CASP13 prompts new routes for future assessments.
    Abriata LA; Tamò GE; Dal Peraro M
    Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1100-1112. PubMed ID: 31344267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. refineD: improved protein structure refinement using machine learning based restrained relaxation.
    Bhattacharya D
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Sep; 35(18):3320-3328. PubMed ID: 30759180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A Simple and Efficient Protein Structure Refinement Method.
    Cheng Q; Joung I; Lee J
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Oct; 13(10):5146-5162. PubMed ID: 28800396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prediction of protein oligomer structures using GALAXY in CASP13.
    Baek M; Park T; Woo H; Seok C
    Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1233-1240. PubMed ID: 31509276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Improving sampling of crystallographic disorder in ensemble refinement.
    Ploscariu N; Burnley T; Gros P; Pearce NM
    Acta Crystallogr D Struct Biol; 2021 Nov; 77(Pt 11):1357-1364. PubMed ID: 34726164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Selective refinement and selection of near-native models in protein structure prediction.
    Zhang J; Barz B; Zhang J; Xu D; Kosztin I
    Proteins; 2015 Oct; 83(10):1823-35. PubMed ID: 26214389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. High-accuracy refinement using Rosetta in CASP13.
    Park H; Lee GR; Kim DE; Anishchenko I; Cong Q; Baker D
    Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1276-1282. PubMed ID: 31325340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Target highlights in CASP13: Experimental target structures through the eyes of their authors.
    Lepore R; Kryshtafovych A; Alahuhta M; Veraszto HA; Bomble YJ; Bufton JC; Bullock AN; Caba C; Cao H; Davies OR; Desfosses A; Dunne M; Fidelis K; Goulding CW; Gurusaran M; Gutsche I; Harding CJ; Hartmann MD; Hayes CS; Joachimiak A; Leiman PG; Loppnau P; Lovering AL; Lunin VV; Michalska K; Mir-Sanchis I; Mitra AK; Moult J; Phillips GN; Pinkas DM; Rice PA; Tong Y; Topf M; Walton JD; Schwede T
    Proteins; 2019 Dec; 87(12):1037-1057. PubMed ID: 31442339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Princeton_TIGRESS: protein geometry refinement using simulations and support vector machines.
    Khoury GA; Tamamis P; Pinnaduwage N; Smadbeck J; Kieslich CA; Floudas CA
    Proteins; 2014 May; 82(5):794-814. PubMed ID: 24174311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Iterative Molecular Dynamics-Rosetta Membrane Protein Structure Refinement Guided by Cryo-EM Densities.
    Leelananda SP; Lindert S
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2017 Oct; 13(10):5131-5145. PubMed ID: 28949136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Protein structure prediction using Rosetta in CASP12.
    Ovchinnikov S; Park H; Kim DE; DiMaio F; Baker D
    Proteins; 2018 Mar; 86 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):113-121. PubMed ID: 28940798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. High-accuracy protein structures by combining machine-learning with physics-based refinement.
    Heo L; Feig M
    Proteins; 2020 May; 88(5):637-642. PubMed ID: 31693199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.