These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31198725)

  • 1. A comparative study of postoperative port-site pain after gallbladder retrieval from umbilical versus epigastric ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Hajong R; Dhal MR; Natung T; Khongwar D; Jyoti AB; Newme K
    J Family Med Prim Care; 2019 May; 8(5):1617-1620. PubMed ID: 31198725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Postoperative Port-Site Pain After Gallbladder Retrieval From Epigastric Versus Umbilical Port in Patients of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Symptomatic Cholelithiasis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Jain A; Tajudeen M; Sreekanth A; Raj Kumar N
    Cureus; 2021 Sep; 13(9):e18087. PubMed ID: 34692302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Postoperative Port Site Infections Among Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Either via Umbilical or Epigastric Port.
    Raj A; Singh S; Raj A; Tajdar Y
    Cureus; 2023 Nov; 15(11):e48709. PubMed ID: 38094556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Postoperative port-site pain after gall bladder retrieval from epigastric vs. umbilical port in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial.
    Siddiqui NA; Azami R; Murtaza G; Nasim S
    Int J Surg; 2012; 10(4):213-6. PubMed ID: 22449831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Umbilical port versus epigastric port for gallbladder extraction in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis.
    Kulkarni AA; Sharma G; Deo KB; Jain T
    Surgeon; 2022 Jun; 20(3):e26-e35. PubMed ID: 33888427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of gallbladder retrieval from an epigastric vs. umbilical port on trocar-site complications A prospective randomized study.
    Kaya C; Bozkurt E; Yazici P
    Ann Ital Chir; 2017; 88():326-329. PubMed ID: 29051399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Epigastric port retrieval of the gallbladder following laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with the reduced risk of port site infection and port site incisional hernia: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Sood S; Imsirovic A; Sains P; Singh KK; Sajid MS
    Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2020 Jul; 55():244-251. PubMed ID: 32528673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retrieval of gallbladder through epigastric port as compared to umbilical port after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Memon JM; Memon MR; Arija D; Bozdar AG; Talpur MM
    Pak J Pharm Sci; 2014 Nov; 27(6 Spec No.):2165-8. PubMed ID: 26045380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retrieval of Gallbladder Via Umbilical Versus Epigastric Port Site During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Hajibandeh S; Hajibandeh S; Clark MC; Barratt OA; Taktak S; Subar D; Henley N
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2019 Oct; 29(5):321-327. PubMed ID: 31033631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Port Site Morbidities Following the Extraction of the Gallbladder from the Umbilical Port in Comparison to the Epigastric Port in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Anand A; Jha AK; Kumar M; Kumar S; Kumar P
    Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e45770. PubMed ID: 37745735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Gallbladder Retrieval From Epigastric Versus Umbilical Port in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A PRISMA-Compliant Meta-Analysis.
    Mongelli F; La Regina D; Zschokke I; Ceppi M; Ferrario di Tor Vajana A; Di Giuseppe M; Fischer H; Heeren N; Metzger J; Gass M
    Surg Innov; 2020 Apr; 27(2):150-159. PubMed ID: 31777324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as a Safe and Feasible Alternative to the Conventional Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
    Chatterjee A; Kumar R; Chattoraj A
    Cureus; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e52196. PubMed ID: 38347985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Randomized trial of umbilical incisional hernia in high-risk patients: extraction of gallbladder through subxiphoid port vs. umbilical port after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Li M; Cao B; Gong R; Sun D; Zhang P; Jiang X; Sheng Y
    Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne; 2018 Sep; 13(3):342-349. PubMed ID: 30302147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two-port needlescopic cholecystectomy: prospective study of 100 cases.
    Lee KW; Poon CM; Leung KF; Lee DW; Ko CW
    Hong Kong Med J; 2005 Feb; 11(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 15687513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Poon CM; Chan KW; Lee DW; Chan KC; Ko CW; Cheung HY; Lee KW
    Surg Endosc; 2003 Oct; 17(10):1624-7. PubMed ID: 12874694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative Study of the Incidence of Port Site Infection in Disposable Ports and Reprocessed Disposable Ports in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.
    Jokar M; Larti N; Zarei M; Melali H; Zabihirad J; Maraki F; Jazini Dorcheh S; Kelidari B
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2022 Dec; 32(6):650-654. PubMed ID: 36223293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-port cholecystectomy maintains safety and feasibility in benign gallbladder diseases: a comparative study.
    Lee SC; Choi BJ; Kim SJ
    Int J Surg; 2014; 12(9):1014-9. PubMed ID: 25053130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Three-port microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy in 159 patients.
    Leggett PL; Bissell CD; Churchman-Winn R; Ahn C
    Surg Endosc; 2001 Mar; 15(3):293-6. PubMed ID: 11344432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. One, two, or three ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?
    Justo-Janeiro JM; Vincent GT; Vázquez de Lara F; de la Rosa Paredes R; Orozco EP; Vázquez de Lara LG
    Int Surg; 2014; 99(6):739-44. PubMed ID: 25437581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Advantages of mini-laparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a prospective randomized trial.
    Novitsky YW; Kercher KW; Czerniach DR; Kaban GK; Khera S; Gallagher-Dorval KA; Callery MP; Litwin DE; Kelly JJ
    Arch Surg; 2005 Dec; 140(12):1178-83. PubMed ID: 16365239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.