These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31199741)
1. Buccal injection of articaine to anesthetize the palatal mucosa. Abu Sharkh M; Khalil A; Ong-Ly C; Wilson TD; Galil K Gen Dent; 2019; 67(3):26-30. PubMed ID: 31199741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Articaine Versus Lidocaine Concentration in the Palatal Tissues After Supraperiosteal Buccal Infiltration Anesthesia. Al-Mahalawy H; Abuohashish H; Chathoth S; Al-Masoud N; Al-Jandan B J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 76(2):315.e1-315.e7. PubMed ID: 29102601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the efficiencies of permanent maxillary tooth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection. Fan S; Chen WL; Yang ZH; Huang ZQ Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Mar; 107(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 18996033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in Equivalent Doses as Buccal and Non-Palatal Infiltration for Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Majid OW; Ahmed AM J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Apr; 76(4):737-743. PubMed ID: 29257943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of articaine and lignocaine for uncomplicated maxillary exodontia. Luqman U; Majeed Janjua OS; Ashfaq M; Irfan H; Mushtaq S; Bilal A J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 25772957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is permanent maxillary tooth removal without palatal injection possible? Uckan S; Dayangac E; Araz K Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Dec; 102(6):733-5. PubMed ID: 17138173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine During Primary Maxillary Molar Extractions in Children. Mittal M; Sharma S; Kumar A; Chopra R; Srivastava D Pediatr Dent; 2015; 37(7):520-4. PubMed ID: 26883609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in achieving pulpal anesthesia in maxillary teeth with irreversible pulpitis. Kanaa MD; Whitworth JM; Meechan JG J Endod; 2012 Mar; 38(3):279-82. PubMed ID: 22341059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extraction of Maxillary Teeth Using Articaine Without a Palatal Injection: A Comparison Between the Anterior and Posterior Regions of the Maxilla. Bataineh AB; Al-Sabri GA J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 75(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 27528103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of single buccal infiltrations for maxillary first molars in patients with irreversible pulpitis: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Atasoy Ulusoy Öİ; Alaçam T Int Endod J; 2014 Mar; 47(3):222-7. PubMed ID: 23656209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Efficacy of 4% Articaine Versus 2% Lidocaine in Inducing Palatal Anesthesia for Tooth Extraction in Different Maxillary Regions. Gholami M; Banihashemrad A; Mohammadzadeh A; Ahrari F J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Aug; 79(8):1643-1649. PubMed ID: 33757745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine for maxillary buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis. Srinivasan N; Kavitha M; Loganathan CS; Padmini G Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jan; 107(1):133-6. PubMed ID: 19101495 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Buffered 4% Articaine as a Primary Buccal Infiltration of the Mandibular First Molar: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Study. Shurtz R; Nusstein J; Reader A; Drum M; Fowler S; Beck M J Endod; 2015 Sep; 41(9):1403-7. PubMed ID: 26095381 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Articaine use does not routinely eliminate the need for palatal injections for primary maxillary molar extractions: a randomized cross-over clinical trial. Bahrololoomi Z; Maghsoudi N Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Dec; 26(4):603-611. PubMed ID: 34853915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of single buccal infiltration anesthesia of 4% articaine with either 1:100,000 or 1:200,000 epinephrine on pulpal blood flow and anesthesia of maxillary first molars and second premolars in humans. Kijsamanmith K; Sriworapongpun C; Pawasut N; Huayhongthong N; Sakulyuenyong T; Krongyoungyuen P; Samdrup T Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Jan; 26(1):343-351. PubMed ID: 34041607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anesthetic Success of an Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block and Supplemental Articaine Buccal Infiltration for Molars and Premolars in Patients with Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis. Fowler S; Drum M; Reader A; Beck M J Endod; 2016 Mar; 42(3):390-2. PubMed ID: 26831048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is it possible to anesthetize palatal tissues with buccal 4% articaine injection? Ozeç I; Taşdemir U; Gümüş C; Solak O J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 May; 68(5):1032-7. PubMed ID: 20223573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study of articaine and lidocaine without palatal injection for maxillary teeth extraction. Bataineh AB; Nusair YM; Al-Rahahleh RQ Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Aug; 23(8):3239-3248. PubMed ID: 30417227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of Articaine Buccal Infiltration Anesthesia for Mandibular Premolar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial. Majid OW; Muhammad ZA J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Sep; 77(9):1784-1789. PubMed ID: 31028737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of articaine and prilocaine anesthesia by infiltration in maxillary and mandibular arches. Haas DA; Harper DG; Saso MA; Young ER Anesth Prog; 1990; 37(5):230-7. PubMed ID: 2096746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]