These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31200209)

  • 1. Regularity detection and explanation-based learning jointly support learning about physical events in early infancy.
    Wang SH
    Cogn Psychol; 2019 Sep; 113():101219. PubMed ID: 31200209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Explanation-based learning in infancy.
    Baillargeon R; DeJong GF
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Oct; 24(5):1511-1526. PubMed ID: 28698990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can infants be "taught" to attend to a new physical variable in an event category? The case of height in covering events.
    Wang SH; Baillargeon R
    Cogn Psychol; 2008 Jun; 56(4):284-326. PubMed ID: 18177635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detecting continuity violations in infancy: a new account and new evidence from covering and tube events.
    Wang SH; Baillargeon R; Paterson S
    Cognition; 2005 Mar; 95(2):129-73. PubMed ID: 15694644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Young infants view physically possible support events as unexpected: New evidence for rule learning.
    Wang SH; Zhang Y; Baillargeon R
    Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():100-105. PubMed ID: 27599219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The developmental origins of naïve psychology in infancy.
    Poulin-Dubois D; Brooker I; Chow V
    Adv Child Dev Behav; 2009; 37():55-104. PubMed ID: 19673160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inducing infants to detect a physical violation in a single trial.
    Wang SH; Baillargeon R
    Psychol Sci; 2005 Jul; 16(7):542-9. PubMed ID: 16008787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When the ordinary seems unexpected: evidence for incremental physical knowledge in young infants.
    Luo Y; Baillargeon R
    Cognition; 2005 Apr; 95(3):297-328. PubMed ID: 15788161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison facilitates the use of height information by 5-month-olds in containment events.
    Goldman EJ; Wang SH
    Dev Psychol; 2019 Dec; 55(12):2475-2482. PubMed ID: 31512889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Infants' knowledge about occlusion and containment events: a surprising discrepancy.
    Hespos SJ; Baillargeon R
    Psychol Sci; 2001 Mar; 12(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 11340923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive development. Observing the unexpected enhances infants' learning and exploration.
    Stahl AE; Feigenson L
    Science; 2015 Apr; 348(6230):91-4. PubMed ID: 25838378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How do the object-file and physical-reasoning systems interact? Evidence from priming effects with object arrays or novel labels.
    Lin Y; Li J; Gertner Y; Ng W; Fisher CL; Baillargeon R
    Cogn Psychol; 2021 Mar; 125():101368. PubMed ID: 33421683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stable individual differences in infants' responses to violations of intuitive physics.
    Perez J; Feigenson L
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Jul; 118(27):. PubMed ID: 34183399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual experience enhances infants' use of task-relevant information in an action task.
    Wang SH; Kohne L
    Dev Psychol; 2007 Nov; 43(6):1513-22. PubMed ID: 18020828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Object individuation: infants' use of shape, size, pattern, and color.
    Wilcox T
    Cognition; 1999 Sep; 72(2):125-66. PubMed ID: 10553669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Young infants' actions reveal their developing knowledge of support variables: converging evidence for violation-of-expectation findings.
    Hespos SJ; Baillargeon R
    Cognition; 2008 Apr; 107(1):304-16. PubMed ID: 17825814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Causal learning by infants and young children: From computational theories to language practices.
    Basch S; Wang SH
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2024; 15(4):e1678. PubMed ID: 38567762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Who is the dynamic duo? How infants learn about the identity of objects in a causal chain.
    Rakison DH; Smith GT; Ali A
    Dev Psychol; 2016 Mar; 52(3):355-63. PubMed ID: 26689760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reasoning about a hidden object after a delay: evidence for robust representations in 5-month-old infants.
    Luo Y; Baillargeon R; Brueckner L; Munakata Y
    Cognition; 2003 Jul; 88(3):B23-32. PubMed ID: 12804819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Infants' statistical learning: 2- and 5-month-olds' segmentation of continuous visual sequences.
    Slone LK; Johnson SP
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 May; 133():47-56. PubMed ID: 25757016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.