306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31200323)
21. Robotic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy in Women With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Single-institution Experience of Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes.
Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Cárdenas-Rebollo JM; Achilarre MT; Garbi A; Patrono MG; Colombo N; Maggioni A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 27158094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter study in China.
Hu TWY; Huang Y; Li N; Nie D; Li Z
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1143-1150. PubMed ID: 32571892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Survival outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: A 9-year study.
Siesto G; Finco A; Portuesi RAV; Romano F; Ieda' NP; Vitobello D
Int J Med Robot; 2019 Aug; 15(4):e2003. PubMed ID: 31039279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Recurrence Rates in Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Abdominal Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Review Study.
Uppal S; Gehrig PA; Peng K; Bixel KL; Matsuo K; Vetter MH; Davidson BA; Cisa MP; Lees BF; Brunette LL; Tucker K; Stuart Staley A; Gotlieb WH; Holloway RW; Essel KG; Holman LL; Goldfeld E; Olawaiye A; Rose SL
J Clin Oncol; 2020 Apr; 38(10):1030-1040. PubMed ID: 32031867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Oncologic and Surgical Outcomes of Robotic Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Matanes E; Abitbol J; Kessous R; Kogan L; Octeau D; Lau S; Salvador S; Gotlieb WH
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2019 Apr; 41(4):450-458. PubMed ID: 30529223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Women With Cervical Cancer: Experience at a Referral Cancer Center.
Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Rollo D; Tomaselli T; Aletti G; Bocciolone L; Landoni F; Cardenas Rebollo JM; Maggioni A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):568-74. PubMed ID: 26825827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Class II versus Class III radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: an observational study in a tertiary center.
Ditto A; Martinelli F; Ramondino S; Vullo SL; Carcangiu M; Haeusler E; Mariani L; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):883-90. PubMed ID: 24613739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of abdominal and minimally invasive radical hysterectomy in patients with early stage cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Lee J; Hong J; Lee SJ; Park DC; Yoon JH
Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(5):1312-1317. PubMed ID: 33526992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States.
Piedimonte S; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Gotlieb W; Abenhaim HA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 30195078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Robotic and laparoscopic Radical type-B and C hysterectomy for cervical cancer: Long term-outcomes.
Pellegrino A; Damiani GR; Loverro M; Pirovano C; Fachechi G; Corso S; Trojano G
Acta Biomed; 2017 Oct; 88(3):289-296. PubMed ID: 29083333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Minimal-invasive or open approach for surgery of early cervical cancer: the treatment center matters.
Gennari P; Gerken M; Mészáros J; Klinkhammer-Schalke M; Ortmann O; Eggemann H; Ignatov A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Aug; 304(2):503-510. PubMed ID: 33483846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Smith AJB; Jones TN; Miao D; Fader AN
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 28(3):544-555.e7. PubMed ID: 33359291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Does the Robotic Platform Reduce Morbidity Associated With Combined Radical Surgery and Adjuvant Radiation for Early Cervical Cancers?
Clark LH; Barber EL; Gehrig PA; Soper JT; Boggess JF; Kim KH
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Oct; 26(8):1485-9. PubMed ID: 27465893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Radical Hysterectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Bulky-Size Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis between the Robotic and Abdominal Approaches.
Liu CH; Lee YC; Lin JC; Chan IS; Lee NR; Chang WH; Liu WM; Wang PH
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Oct; 16(20):. PubMed ID: 31614465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Early stage cervical cancer: Brachytherapy followed by type a hysterectomy versus type B radical hysterectomy alone, a retrospective evaluation.
Lacorre A; Merlot B; Garabedian C; Narducci F; Chereau E; Resbeut M; Minsat M; Leblanc E; Houvenaeghel G; Lambaudie E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Mar; 42(3):376-82. PubMed ID: 26725307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Predictors of recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A multi-institutional study.
Casarin J; Buda A; Bogani G; Fanfani F; Papadia A; Ceccaroni M; Malzoni M; Pellegrino A; Ferrari F; Greggi S; Uccella S; Pinelli C; Cromi A; Ditto A; Di Martino G; Anchora LP; Falcone F; Bonfiglio F; Odicino F; Mueller M; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F; Landoni F; Ghezzi F
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 159(1):164-170. PubMed ID: 32665147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Patterns of recurrence after laparoscopic versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.
Bogani G; Ghezzi F; Chiva L; Gisone B; Pinelli C; Dell'Acqua A; Casarin J; Ditto A; Raspagliesi F
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jul; 30(7):987-992. PubMed ID: 32448809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Robot-assisted approach to cervical cancer (RACC): an international multi-center, open-label randomized controlled trial.
Falconer H; Palsdottir K; Stalberg K; Dahm-Kähler P; Ottander U; Lundin ES; Wijk L; Kimmig R; Jensen PT; Zahl Eriksson AG; Mäenpää J; Persson J; Salehi S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jul; 29(6):1072-1076. PubMed ID: 31203203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The long-term efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical hysterectomy compared with radical surgery alone or concurrent chemoradiotherapy on locally advanced-stage cervical cancer.
Yin M; Zhao F; Lou G; Zhang H; Sun M; Li C; Hou Y; Li X; Meng F; Chen X
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Jan; 21(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 21330834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
