BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

612 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31200640)

  • 1. The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.
    Martin JT; Hemming K; Girling A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):123. PubMed ID: 31200640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative efficiency of unequal cluster sizes in stepped wedge and other trial designs under longitudinal or cross-sectional sampling.
    Girling AJ
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(30):4652-4664. PubMed ID: 30209812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The optimal design of stepped wedge trials with equal allocation to sequences and a comparison to other trial designs.
    Thompson JA; Fielding K; Hargreaves J; Copas A
    Clin Trials; 2017 Dec; 14(6):639-647. PubMed ID: 28797179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimum number of clusters and comparison of analysis methods for cross sectional stepped wedge cluster randomised trials with binary outcomes: A simulation study.
    Barker D; D'Este C; Campbell MJ; McElduff P
    Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):119. PubMed ID: 28279222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An imbalance in cluster sizes does not lead to notable loss of power in cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with a continuous outcome.
    Kristunas CA; Smith KL; Gray LJ
    Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):109. PubMed ID: 28270224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Appropriate statistical methods for analysing partially nested randomised controlled trials with continuous outcomes: a simulation study.
    Candlish J; Teare MD; Dimairo M; Flight L; Mandefield L; Walters SJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):105. PubMed ID: 30314463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Substantial risks associated with few clusters in cluster randomized and stepped wedge designs.
    Taljaard M; Teerenstra S; Ivers NM; Fergusson DA
    Clin Trials; 2016 Aug; 13(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 26940696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Information growth for sequential monitoring of clinical trials with a stepped wedge cluster randomized design and unknown intracluster correlation.
    Brown SP; Shoben AB
    Clin Trials; 2020 Apr; 17(2):176-183. PubMed ID: 32026713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. swdpwr: A SAS macro and an R package for power calculations in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.
    Chen J; Zhou X; Li F; Spiegelman D
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Jan; 213():106522. PubMed ID: 34818620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sample size calculation for stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trials with more than two levels of clustering.
    Teerenstra S; Taljaard M; Haenen A; Huis A; Atsma F; Rodwell L; Hulscher M
    Clin Trials; 2019 Jun; 16(3):225-236. PubMed ID: 31018678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of non-uniform correlation structure on sample size and power in multiple-period cluster randomised trials.
    Kasza J; Hemming K; Hooper R; Matthews J; Forbes AB
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Mar; 28(3):703-716. PubMed ID: 29027505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sample size calculation for a stepped wedge trial.
    Baio G; Copas A; Ambler G; Hargreaves J; Beard E; Omar RZ
    Trials; 2015 Aug; 16():354. PubMed ID: 26282553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cluster randomised trials with different numbers of measurements at baseline and endline: Sample size and optimal allocation.
    Copas AJ; Hooper R
    Clin Trials; 2020 Feb; 17(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 31580144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Power calculation for cross-sectional stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with variable cluster sizes.
    Harrison LJ; Chen T; Wang R
    Biometrics; 2020 Sep; 76(3):951-962. PubMed ID: 31625596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Five questions to consider before conducting a stepped wedge trial.
    Hargreaves JR; Copas AJ; Beard E; Osrin D; Lewis JJ; Davey C; Thompson JA; Baio G; Fielding KL; Prost A
    Trials; 2015 Aug; 16():350. PubMed ID: 26279013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trials: a generic framework including parallel and multiple-level designs.
    Hemming K; Lilford R; Girling AJ
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):181-96. PubMed ID: 25346484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stepped wedge designs could reduce the required sample size in cluster randomized trials.
    Woertman W; de Hoop E; Moerbeek M; Zuidema SU; Gerritsen DL; Teerenstra S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jul; 66(7):752-8. PubMed ID: 23523551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Explaining the variation in the attained power of a stepped-wedge trial with unequal cluster sizes.
    Ouyang Y; Karim ME; Gustafson P; Field TS; Wong H
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):166. PubMed ID: 32580698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sample size calculation for stepped wedge and other longitudinal cluster randomised trials.
    Hooper R; Teerenstra S; de Hoop E; Eldridge S
    Stat Med; 2016 Nov; 35(26):4718-4728. PubMed ID: 27350420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.