These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
359 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31200848)
1. Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Micro-ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsies for the Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. Lughezzani G; Saita A; Lazzeri M; Paciotti M; Maffei D; Lista G; Hurle R; Buffi NM; Guazzoni G; Casale P Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):329-332. PubMed ID: 31200848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evolution of Targeted Prostate Biopsy by Adding Micro-Ultrasound to the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pathway. Wiemer L; Hollenbach M; Heckmann R; Kittner B; Plage H; Reimann M; Asbach P; Friedersdorff F; Schlomm T; Hofbauer S; Cash H Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Nov; 7(6):1292-1299. PubMed ID: 32654967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Multicentre Analysis of the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Following Transperineal Image-fusion Targeted and Nontargeted Systematic Prostate Biopsy in Men at Risk. Miah S; Hosking-Jervis F; Connor MJ; Eldred-Evans D; Shah TT; Arya M; Barber N; Bhardwa J; Bott S; Burke D; Doherty A; Foster C; Freeman A; Hindley R; Jameson C; Karim O; Laniado M; Montgomery B; Nigam R; Punwani S; Sinclair A; Winkler M; Allen C; Ahmed HU Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Jun; 3(3):262-269. PubMed ID: 31411968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Do cancer detection rates differ between transperineal and transrectal micro-ultrasound mpMRI-fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? A propensity score-matched study. Rakauskas A; Peters M; Martel P; van Rossum PSN; La Rosa S; Meuwly JY; Roth B; Valerio M PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280262. PubMed ID: 36652429 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combining prostate health index and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in an Asian population. Hsieh PF; Li WJ; Lin WC; Chang H; Chang CH; Huang CP; Yang CR; Chen WC; Chang YH; Wu HC World J Urol; 2020 May; 38(5):1207-1214. PubMed ID: 31440806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study. van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate Mapping for Cancer Diagnosis: The Madrid Protocol. Transperineal Prostate Biopsies Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion and Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsies. Rodríguez Socarrás ME; Gomez Rivas J; Cuadros Rivera V; Reinoso Elbers J; Llanes González L; Michel Mercado I; Fernandez Del Alamo J; Juarez Del Dago P; Sancha FG J Urol; 2020 Oct; 204(4):726-733. PubMed ID: 32314932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Targeted Biopsy with Four Cores Versus Target Saturation Biopsy with Nine Cores in Transperineal Prostate Fusion Biopsy: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Saner YM; Wiesenfarth M; Weru V; Ladyzhensky B; Tschirdewahn S; Püllen L; Bonekamp D; Reis H; Krafft U; Heß J; Kesch C; Darr C; Forsting M; Wetter A; Umutlu L; Haubold J; Hadaschik B; Radtke JP Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Feb; 6(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 36175281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of Prostate Specific Antigen Density Combined with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Improves Triage for Prostate Biopsy. Záleský M; Stejskal J; Adamcova V; Hrbáček J; Minarik I; Pavlicko A; Votrubova J; Babjuk M; Zachoval R Urol Int; 2019; 103(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 31067560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Not All Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsies Are Equal: The Impact of the Type of Approach and Operator Expertise on the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Dehò F; Scattoni V; Maga T; Losa A; Gaboardi F; Cardone G; Esposito A; De Cobelli F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 31100235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening at the Age of 45 Years: Results from the First Screening Round of the PROBASE Trial. Boschheidgen M; Albers P; Schlemmer HP; Hellms S; Bonekamp D; Sauter A; Hadaschik B; Krilaviciute A; Radtke JP; Seibold P; Lakes J; Arsov C; Gschwend JE; Herkommer K; Makowski M; Kuczyk MA; Wacker F; Harke N; Debus J; Körber SA; Benner A; Kristiansen G; Giesel FL; Antoch G; Kaaks R; Becker N; Schimmöller L Eur Urol; 2024 Feb; 85(2):105-111. PubMed ID: 37863727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy. Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic Implications of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Concomitant Systematic Biopsy in Predicting Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy. Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Valerio M; Marra G; Moschini M; Martini A; Roumiguié M; Fossati N; Stabile A; Beauval JB; Malavaud B; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Afferi L; Rakauskas A; Gontero P; Mattei A; Montorsi F; Briganti A Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 3(6):739-747. PubMed ID: 32847747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Systematic and MRI-Cognitive Targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Accuracy in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer after Previous Negative Biopsy and Persisting Suspicion of Malignancy. Vėželis A; Platkevičius G; Kinčius M; Gumbys L; Naruševičiūtė I; Briedienė R; Petroška D; Ulys A; Jankevičius F Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Jan; 57(1):. PubMed ID: 33435132 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. MRI in-bore biopsy following MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy in patients with persistent suspicion of clinically significant prostate cancer. Quentin M; Boschheidgen M; Radtke JP; Spohn F; Ullrich T; Drewes L; Valentin B; Lakes J; Al-Monajjed ; Arsov C; Esposito I; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L Eur J Radiol; 2024 Jun; 175():111436. PubMed ID: 38522396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of MRI-ultrasound fusion-guided and systematic biopsy of the prostate. In de Braekt T; van Rooij SBT; Daniels-Gooszen AW; Scheepens WA; de Jongh R; Bosch SL; Nederend J Br J Radiol; 2024 May; 97(1158):1132-1138. PubMed ID: 38627253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Growth Patterns of Prostate Cancers Undetected by Prostate 3T Multiparametric MRI. Chang KP; Hsieh PF; Lin WC; Chang H In Vivo; 2024; 38(2):833-841. PubMed ID: 38418107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound-guided Target Biopsy in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer. Kurokawa G; Mori K; Sasaki H; Nakano J; Takahashi Y; Iwatani K; Urabe F; Tsuzuki S; Koike Y; Sato S; Takahashi H; Miki K; Kimura T Anticancer Res; 2024 Feb; 44(2):679-686. PubMed ID: 38307559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial. Tonttila PP; Lantto J; Pääkkö E; Piippo U; Kauppila S; Lammentausta E; Ohtonen P; Vaarala MH Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26033153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]