184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31201191)
21. Prediction of High-grade Prostate Cancer Following Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculators.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; Schoots IG; Chiu PK; Osses DF; Tijsterman JD; Beerlage HP; Mannaerts CK; Schimmöller L; Albers P; Arsov C
Eur Urol; 2019 Feb; 75(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 30082150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Population-based randomized trial of screening for clinically significant prostate cancer ProScreen: a pilot study.
Rannikko A; Leht M; Mirtti T; Kenttämies A; Tolonen T; Rinta-Kiikka I; Kilpeläinen TP; Natunen K; Lilja H; Lehtimäki T; Raitanen J; Kujala P; Ronkainen J; Matikainen M; Petas A; Taari K; Tammela T; Auvinen A
BJU Int; 2022 Aug; 130(2):193-199. PubMed ID: 34958531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A Prospective Multicenter Comparison Study of Risk-adapted Ultrasound-directed and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Diagnostic Pathways for Suspected Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Wagensveld IM; Osses DF; Groenendijk PM; Zijta FM; Busstra MB; Rociu E; Barentsz JO; Michiel Sedelaar JP; Arbeel B; Roeleveld T; Geenen R; Koeter I; van der Meer SA; Cappendijk V; Somford R; Klaver S; Van der Lely H; Wolters T; Hellings W; Leter MR; Van der Poel HG; Heijmink SWTPJ; Debruyne F; Immerzeel J; Leijte J; van Roermund J; Miclea R; Planken E; Vis AN; Jan de Jong I; Tijsterman J; Wolterbeek D; Claessen A; Vrijhof E; Nederend J; Van Leenders GJLH; Bangma CH; Krestin GP; Remmers S; Schoots IG;
Eur Urol; 2022 Sep; 82(3):318-326. PubMed ID: 35341658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A multicentre randomised controlled trial assessing whether MRI-targeted biopsy is non-inferior to standard transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in men without prior biopsy: a study protocol.
Kasivisvanathan V; Jichi F; Klotz L; Villers A; Taneja SS; Punwani S; Freeman A; Emberton M; Moore CM
BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e017863. PubMed ID: 29025845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The value of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography (MRI/US)-fusion biopsy platforms in prostate cancer detection: a systematic review.
Gayet M; van der Aa A; Beerlage HP; Schrier BP; Mulders PF; Wijkstra H
BJU Int; 2016 Mar; 117(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 26237632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Cost-effectiveness of Prostate Cancer Screening Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Standard Biopsy Based on the STHLM3-MRI Study.
Hao S; Discacciati A; Eklund M; Heintz E; Östensson E; Elfström KM; Clements MS; Nordström T
JAMA Oncol; 2022 Nov; 9(1):88-94. PubMed ID: 36355382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Screening for prostate cancer.
Ilic D; Neuberger MM; Djulbegovic M; Dahm P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Jan; 2013(1):CD004720. PubMed ID: 23440794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Incorporating Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biomarkers in Active Surveillance Protocols - Results From the Prospective Stockholm3 Active Surveillance Trial (STHLM3AS).
Olsson H; Nordström T; Jäderling F; Egevad L; Vigneswaran HT; Annerstedt M; Grönberg H; Eklund M; Lantz A
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2021 May; 113(5):632-640. PubMed ID: 32866231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. External Validation of the Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator and Comparison with Stockholm3 for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in a Swedish Population-based Screening Cohort.
Palsdottir T; Grönberg H; Hilmisson A; Eklund M; Nordström T; Vigneswaran HT
Eur Urol Focus; 2023 May; 9(3):455-462. PubMed ID: 36522257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers.
Hoeks CM; Schouten MG; Bomers JG; Hoogendoorn SP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Hambrock T; Vergunst H; Sedelaar JP; Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2012 Nov; 62(5):902-9. PubMed ID: 22325447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Systematic and MRI-Cognitive Targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy Accuracy in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer after Previous Negative Biopsy and Persisting Suspicion of Malignancy.
Vėželis A; Platkevičius G; Kinčius M; Gumbys L; Naruševičiūtė I; Briedienė R; Petroška D; Ulys A; Jankevičius F
Medicina (Kaunas); 2021 Jan; 57(1):. PubMed ID: 33435132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The GÖTEBORG prostate cancer screening 2 trial: a prospective, randomised, population-based prostate cancer screening trial with prostate-specific antigen testing followed by magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate.
Kohestani K; Månsson M; Arnsrud Godtman R; Stranne J; Wallström J; Carlsson S; Hellström M; Hugosson J
Scand J Urol; 2021 Apr; 55(2):116-124. PubMed ID: 33612068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Population-Based Prostate Cancer Screening With Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Ultrasonography: The IP1-PROSTAGRAM Study.
Eldred-Evans D; Burak P; Connor MJ; Day E; Evans M; Fiorentino F; Gammon M; Hosking-Jervis F; Klimowska-Nassar N; McGuire W; Padhani AR; Prevost AT; Price D; Sokhi H; Tam H; Winkler M; Ahmed HU
JAMA Oncol; 2021 Mar; 7(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 33570542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The Stockholm-3 (STHLM3) Model can Improve Prostate Cancer Diagnostics in Men Aged 50-69 yr Compared with Current Prostate Cancer Testing.
Eklund M; Nordström T; Aly M; Adolfsson J; Wiklund P; Brandberg Y; Thompson J; Wiklund F; Lindberg J; Presti JC; StLezin M; Clements M; Egevad L; Grönberg H
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):707-710. PubMed ID: 28753803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Improved prostate cancer diagnostics with a struc-tured pathway including the Stockholm3 test and MRI--targeted biopsies - experiences from Capio S:t Göran Prostate Cancer Center].
Bergman M; Hjälm Ericsson M; Jäderling F; Meurling E; Thorstensson A; Nordström T; Henrik G
Lakartidningen; 2018 Oct; 115():. PubMed ID: 30351440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Biopsy Strategies for Changing the Paradigm of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.
Schoots IG; Padhani AR; Rouvière O; Barentsz JO; Richenberg J
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Feb; 3(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 31706946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of increasing the PSA cutoff to perform additional biomarker tests before prostate biopsy.
Nordström T; Adolfsson J; Grönberg H; Eklund M
BMC Urol; 2017 Oct; 17(1):92. PubMed ID: 28974201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A Head-to-head Comparison of Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Strategies Using the Stockholm3 Test, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Swedish National Guidelines: Results from a Prospective Population-based Screening Study.
Waldén M; Aldrimer M; Lagerlöf JH; Eklund M; Grönberg H; Nordström T; Palsdottir T
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Apr; 38():32-39. PubMed ID: 35495282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Danish Prostate Cancer Consortium Study 1 (DPCC-1) protocol: Multicentre prospective validation of the urine-based three-microRNA biomarker model uCaP.
Fredsøe J; Glud E; Boesen L; Løgager V; Poulsen MH; Pedersen BG; Borre M; Sørensen KD
BMJ Open; 2023 Nov; 13(11):e077020. PubMed ID: 37940151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
