These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31201511)

  • 21. Differences in the temporal course of interaural time difference sensitivity between acoustic and electric hearing in amplitude modulated stimuli.
    Hu H; Ewert SD; McAlpine D; Dietz M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1862. PubMed ID: 28372072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cortical Processing of Level Cues for Spatial Hearing is Impaired in Children with Prelingual Deafness Despite Early Bilateral Access to Sound.
    Easwar V; Yamazaki H; Deighton M; Papsin B; Gordon K
    Brain Topogr; 2018 Mar; 31(2):270-287. PubMed ID: 29119311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reducing the Device Delay Mismatch Can Improve Sound Localization in Bimodal Cochlear Implant/Hearing-Aid Users.
    Zirn S; Angermeier J; Arndt S; Aschendorff A; Wesarg T
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519843876. PubMed ID: 31018790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
    Laback B; Pok SM; Baumgartner WD; Deutsch WA; Schmid K
    Ear Hear; 2004 Oct; 25(5):488-500. PubMed ID: 15599195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Lateralization of interimplant timing and level differences in children who use bilateral cochlear implants.
    Salloum CA; Valero J; Wong DD; Papsin BC; van Hoesel R; Gordon KA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):441-56. PubMed ID: 20489647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Mismatch negativity as a marker of music perception in individual cochlear implant users: A spike density component analysis study.
    Haumann NT; Petersen B; Friis Andersen AS; Faulkner KF; Brattico E; Vuust P
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2023 Apr; 148():76-92. PubMed ID: 36822119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bilateral cochlear implants in children: Effects of auditory experience and deprivation on auditory perception.
    Litovsky RY; Gordon K
    Hear Res; 2016 Aug; 338():76-87. PubMed ID: 26828740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sound localization and sensitivity to interaural cues in bilateral users of the Med-El Combi 40/40+cochlear implant system.
    Schoen F; Mueller J; Helms J; Nopp P
    Otol Neurotol; 2005 May; 26(3):429-37. PubMed ID: 15891645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An objective auditory measure to assess speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users.
    Turgeon C; Lazzouni L; Lepore F; Ellemberg D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Apr; 125(4):827-835. PubMed ID: 24209981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interaural time and level difference thresholds for acoustically presented signals in post-lingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants using CIS+ processing.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Haynes DS; Labadie RF
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jan; 29(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 18091105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of interaural differences in envelope shape on the perceived location of sounds (L).
    Francart T; Lenssen A; Wouters J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):611-4. PubMed ID: 22894182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Provision of interaural time difference information in chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation enhances neural sensitivity to these differences in neonatally deafened cats.
    Thompson AC; Irvine DRF; Fallon JB
    Hear Res; 2021 Jul; 406():108253. PubMed ID: 33971428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of Interaural Electrode Pairing Methods for Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Hu H; Dietz M
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26631108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Coherent Coding of Enhanced Interaural Cues Improves Sound Localization in Noise With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
    Williges B; Jürgens T; Hu H; Dietz M
    Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518781746. PubMed ID: 29956589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of interaural time differences in fine structure and envelope on lateral discrimination in electric hearing.
    Majdak P; Laback B; Baumgartner WD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Oct; 120(4):2190-201. PubMed ID: 17069315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The mismatch negativity in cochlear implant users.
    Ponton CW; Don M
    Ear Hear; 1995 Feb; 16(1):131-46. PubMed ID: 7774766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using a multi-feature paradigm to measure mismatch responses to minimal sound contrasts in children with cochlear implants and hearing aids.
    Uhlén I; Engström E; Kallioinen P; Nakeva von Mentzer C; Lyxell B; Sahlén B; Lindgren M; Ors M
    Scand J Psychol; 2017 Oct; 58(5):409-421. PubMed ID: 28901574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Grantham DW; Ashmead DH; Ricketts TA; Labadie RF; Haynes DS
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):524-41. PubMed ID: 17609614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Spatial Hearing by Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users With Temporal Fine-Structure Processing.
    Ausili SA; Agterberg MJH; Engel A; Voelter C; Thomas JP; Brill S; Snik AFM; Dazert S; Van Opstal AJ; Mylanus EAM
    Front Neurol; 2020; 11():915. PubMed ID: 33101160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.