76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3120164)
1. [Sensitivity to cefotaxime of bacterial strains isolated at a surgical clinic 1983-1985].
Polaczek-Kornecka B; Dziadur-Goldsztajn Z; Turowski G
Pol Tyg Lek; 1987 Aug 3-10; 42(31-32):979-81. PubMed ID: 3120164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Incidence and sensitivity to antibiotics of germs isolated from surgical wound infections].
Berceanu Văduva D; Moldovan R; Dumitraşcu V; Muntean D; Bădiţoiu L; Licker M; Crăciunescu M; Dan L; Branea D; Hogea E; Amăricăi E; Horhat F; Grigoraş D; Popa M; Berceanu Văduva M
Bacteriol Virusol Parazitol Epidemiol; 2003; 48(2-3):123-9. PubMed ID: 15341326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Antiseptic compounds still active against bacterial strains isolated from surgical wound infections despite increasing antibiotic resistance.
Giacometti A; Cirioni O; Greganti G; Fineo A; Ghiselli R; Del Prete MS; Mocchegiani F; Fileni B; Caselli F; Petrelli E; Saba V; Scalise G
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2002 Jul; 21(7):553-6. PubMed ID: 12172750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Sensitivity of bacterial strains isolated from the urine in relation to type and frequency of use of antibacterial drugs (1972-1975, 1979-1981)].
Wencel J; Mularczyk H
Pol Tyg Lek; 1984 Jul; 39(28):951-5. PubMed ID: 6436802
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [In vitro studies of tobramycin sensitivity of bacterial strains isolated from children treated in the Institute for Mother and Child].
Duroś H; Nowakowska K
Probl Med Wieku Rozwoj; 1982; 11():117-20. PubMed ID: 6817325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Antimicrobial susceptibility pattern of bacterial isolates from post-operative wound infections.
Arya M; Arya PK; Biswas D; Prasad R
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2005 Apr; 48(2):266-9. PubMed ID: 16758692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparative study of the effect of sisomicin and other aminoglycosides on the causative agents of surgical infection].
Navashin PS
Antibiotiki; 1982 Dec; 27(12):26-9. PubMed ID: 6819812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Sensitivity of bacteria to netilmicin in comparison with their sensitivity to gentamicin and other aminoglycosides].
Ruczkowska J; Dolna I
Przegl Lek; 1988; 45(4):383-6. PubMed ID: 3145533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Study of the effectiveness of new quaternary ammonium salts against selected strains of bacteria and fungi. Sensitivity of microbial strains isolated from patients to various ammonium salts].
Pernak J; Kucharski S
Acta Pol Pharm; 1979; 36(3):377-82. PubMed ID: 117676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Activities of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, cefuroxime, and cephalothin against 128 clinical isolates.
Garcia-Rodriguez JA
Clin Ther; 1980; 3(Spec Issue):117-22. PubMed ID: 6248220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Bacterial evaluation of wound infections].
Gedikoğlu S
Mikrobiyol Bul; 1986 Apr; 20(2):59-66. PubMed ID: 3773797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Sensitivity to cefotiam of 494 hospital bacterial strains. Determination of minimal inhibitory concentration and comparison with other beta-lactams].
Reynaud A; Desnoes M; Derriennic M; Courtieu AL
Pathol Biol (Paris); 1985 May; 33(5):313-9. PubMed ID: 3929216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Antibacterial activity of cephamandole--a new antibiotic.
Goyal P; Bhatia R; Baveja UK; Agarwal DS
J Commun Dis; 1982 Jun; 14(2):130-3. PubMed ID: 6818272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Sensitivity of bacteria to antibiotics in urinary tract infection].
Mróz E; Gościniak G; Ruczkowska J; Grzybek-hryncewicz K; Choroszy I
Wiad Lek; 1981 Jul; 34(13):1085-9. PubMed ID: 6795830
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The in vitro activity of netilmicin against 357 clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus.
Digranes A; Dibb WL; Ostervold B
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl; 1980; Suppl 23():30-3. PubMed ID: 6782655
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical impact and risk factors for percutaneous gastrostomy wound infections due to resistant organisms.
Mahadeva S; Khoo BL; Khoo PS; Malik A; Hilmi I; Qua CS; Wong CH; Goh KL
Int J Infect Dis; 2008 Nov; 12(6):e149-50. PubMed ID: 18635384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Minimal inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations of cefoperazone, cefotaxime, cefuroxime and cefalotin against 90 bacterial strains].
Mascellino MT; Prignano G; Iegri F; Lorenzi A
Boll Ist Sieroter Milan; 1982; 61(4):309-19. PubMed ID: 6100234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparative study of the activity of several disinfectants against bacterial strains isolated in a hospital environment and of laboratory origin].
Finzi G; Grimaldi G
Arch Sci Med (Torino); 1980; 137(4):749-62. PubMed ID: 6788018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Introduction to the CANWARD Study (2007-2009).
Hoban DJ; Zhanel GG
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2011 Mar; 69(3):289-90. PubMed ID: 21353956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Low antibiotic resistance rates in Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp but not in Enterobacter spp and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a prospective observational study in 14 Swedish ICUs over a 5-year period.
Hanberger H; Burman LG; Cars O; Erlandsson M; Gill H; Nilsson LE; Nordlinder D; Walther SM;
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2007 Aug; 51(7):937-41. PubMed ID: 17635399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
