These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31202554)

  • 21. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: influence of implant inclination on retentive and lateral forces.
    Yang TC; Maeda Y; Gonda T; Kotecha S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1315-9. PubMed ID: 21426402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Impact of implants number and attachment type on the peri-implant stresses and retention of palateless implant-retained overdenture.
    Hegazy SA; El Mekawy N; Emera RMK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2020; 31(3):414-419. PubMed ID: 32769276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of retention and stability of implant-retained overdentures based upon implant number and distribution.
    Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):1619-28. PubMed ID: 24278931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In Vitro Evaluation of the Retentive Effectiveness of Axial Attachments Used in Implant-Retained Overdentures After 1 Year of Function.
    Chávarri-Prado D; Brizuela-Velasco A; Diéguez-Pereira M; Chento-Valiente Y; Estrada-Martínez A; Pérez-Pevida E; Álvarez-Arenal Á
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):556-562. PubMed ID: 35727248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of Denture Cleansing Solutions on the Retention of Locator Attachments Over Time.
    Ayyıldız S; Şahin C; Emir F; Ersu B
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Mar; 29(3):237-242. PubMed ID: 31943512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
    Celik G; Uludag B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Retention and wear of resin matrix attachments for implant overdentures.
    Wichmann N; Kern M; Taylor T; Wille S; Passia N
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Oct; 110():103901. PubMed ID: 32957206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Investigation of retentive force reduction and wear of the locator attachment system with different implant angulations.
    Rabbani S; Juszczyk AS; Clark RK; Radford DR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(3):556-63. PubMed ID: 25671627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Freedom of rotation of selected overdenture attachments: an in vitro study.
    Chen IC; Brudvik JS; Mancl LA; Rubenstein JE; Chitswe K; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Aug; 106(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 21821161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
    Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Retention and Stability of Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures Using Different Types of Resilient Attachments: An In Vitro Study.
    ELsyad MA; Agha NN; Habib AA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1040-8. PubMed ID: 27632258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluation of the retention characteristics of various stud attachment systems for implant retained overdenture.
    Gonuldas F; Tokar E; Ozturk C
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2018; 20(4):135-141. PubMed ID: 30821291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of retention and wear of a titanium-formed stud overdenture attachment with different interimplant angulations after simulated clinical use: An in vitro study.
    Elsonbaty MA; Alshimy AM; Abdul-Monem MM; Neena AF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):205.e1-205.e10. PubMed ID: 35842280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Retention of mandibular implant-retained overdentures with two different attachment designs: An in vitro study.
    Ramadan RE; Mohamed FS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):738.e1-738.e6. PubMed ID: 32165012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stress analysis of mandibular two-implant overdenture with different attachment systems.
    Takeshita S; Kanazawa M; Minakuchi S
    Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(6):928-34. PubMed ID: 22123019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Locator Versus Bar Attachment Effect on the Retention and Stability of Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdenture: An In Vitro Study.
    ELsyad MA; Dayekh MA; Khalifa AK
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e627-e636. PubMed ID: 28387994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of Simulated Mastication on the Retention of Locator Attachments for Implant-Supported Overdentures: An In Vitro Pilot Study.
    Tehini G; Baba NZ; Berberi A; Majzoub Z; Bassal H; Rifai K
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jan; 29(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 28913855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro comparison of the retentive properties of ball and locator attachments for implant overdentures.
    Türk PE; Geckili O; Türk Y; Günay V; Bilgin T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25216136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of detachment forces of two implant overdenture attachment types: effect of detachment speed.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW; Damrow MP; Galbraith CT
    Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 18795521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.