BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31202572)

  • 41. Validation of the 6th edition AJCC Pancreatic Cancer Staging System: report from the National Cancer Database.
    Bilimoria KY; Bentrem DJ; Ko CY; Ritchey J; Stewart AK; Winchester DP; Talamonti MS
    Cancer; 2007 Aug; 110(4):738-44. PubMed ID: 17580363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The Eighth Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Distant Metastases Stage Classification for Metastatic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Might Be Feasible for Metastatic Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinomas.
    Wen J; Chen J; Liu D; Xu X; Fan M; Zhang Z
    Neuroendocrinology; 2020; 110(5):364-376. PubMed ID: 31357196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Validation of the AJCC 8th lung cancer staging system among patients with small cell lung cancer.
    Abdel-Rahman O
    Clin Transl Oncol; 2018 Apr; 20(4):550-556. PubMed ID: 28808860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Tumor-Infiltrating Platelets Predict Postsurgical Survival in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.
    Zhang SR; Yao L; Wang WQ; Xu JZ; Xu HX; Jin W; Gao HL; Wu CT; Qi ZH; Li H; Li S; Ni QX; Yu XJ; Fu DL; Liu L
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 25(13):3984-3993. PubMed ID: 30171511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition stage system for gastric cancer patients: a population-based analysis.
    He X; Wu W; Lin Z; Ding Y; Si J; Sun LM
    Gastric Cancer; 2018 May; 21(3):391-400. PubMed ID: 29052053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Appraisal of the AJCC 8th edition pathologic staging modifications for HPV-positive oropharyngeal cancer, a study of the National Cancer Data Base.
    Zhan KY; Eskander A; Kang SY; Old MO; Ozer E; Agrawal AA; Carrau RL; Rocco JW; Teknos TN
    Oral Oncol; 2017 Oct; 73():152-159. PubMed ID: 28939068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Clinical Implications of Extensive Lymph Node Metastases for Resected Pancreatic Cancer.
    Lowder CY; Metkus J; Epstein J; Kozak GM; Lavu H; Yeo CJ; Winter JM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 Dec; 25(13):4004-4011. PubMed ID: 30225835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Challenging a dogma; AJCC 8th staging system is not sufficient to predict outcomes of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.
    Abdel-Rahman O
    Lung Cancer; 2017 Nov; 113():128-133. PubMed ID: 29110839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Assessment of the American Joint Commission on Cancer 8th Edition Staging System for Patients with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results analysis.
    Li X; Gou S; Liu Z; Ye Z; Wang C
    Cancer Med; 2018 Mar; 7(3):626-634. PubMed ID: 29380547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The efficacy of adjuvant therapy for pancreatic invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN).
    McMillan MT; Lewis RS; Drebin JA; Teitelbaum UR; Lee MK; Roses RE; Fraker DL; Vollmer CM
    Cancer; 2016 Feb; 122(4):521-33. PubMed ID: 26587698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The number and ratio of positive lymph nodes affect pancreatic cancer patient survival after neoadjuvant therapy and pancreaticoduodenectomy.
    Fischer LK; Katz MH; Lee SM; Liu L; Wang H; Varadhachary GR; Wolff RA; Lee JE; Maitra A; Roland CL; Fleming JB; Estrella J; Rashid A; Wang H
    Histopathology; 2016 Jan; 68(2):210-20. PubMed ID: 25945396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Pancreatic cancer metastatic to a limited number of lymph nodes has no impact on outcome.
    Baldwin S; Kukar M; Gabriel E; Attwood K; Wilkinson N; Hochwald SN; Kuvshinoff B
    HPB (Oxford); 2016 Jun; 18(6):523-8. PubMed ID: 27317957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. DIPLOMA Approach for Standardized Pathology Assessment of Distal Pancreatectomy Specimens.
    Lof S; Rajak R; Vissers FLIM; Korrel M; Bateman A; Verheij J; Verbeke C; Cataldo I; Besselink MG; Abu Hilal M
    J Vis Exp; 2020 Feb; (156):. PubMed ID: 32065168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Validation and modification of the AJCC 8th TNM staging system for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in a Chinese cohort: A nationwide pancreas data center analysis.
    Hu H; Qu C; Tang B; Liu W; Ma Y; Chen Y; Xie X; Zhuang Y; Gao H; Tian X; Yang Y
    Chin J Cancer Res; 2021 Aug; 33(4):457-469. PubMed ID: 34584371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Application of the Eighth Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.
    Liu C; Cheng H; Jin K; Guo M; Lu Y; Wang Z; Yang C; Long J; Ni Q; Yu X; Luo G
    Pancreas; 2018 Jul; 47(6):742-747. PubMed ID: 29851752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Validation of the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor-node-metastasis (AJCC TNM) staging in patients with stage II and stage III colorectal carcinoma: analysis of 2511 cases from a medical centre in Korea.
    Kim KH; Yang SS; Yoon YS; Lim SB; Yu CS; Kim JC
    Colorectal Dis; 2011 Aug; 13(8):e220-6. PubMed ID: 21689314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparative Performance of the 7th and 8th Editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Systems for Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Trunk and Extremities.
    Fisher SB; Chiang YJ; Feig BW; Cormier JN; Hunt KK; Torres KE; Roland CL
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2018 May; 25(5):1126-1132. PubMed ID: 29468609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Modification of the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for gallbladder carcinoma to improve prognostic precision.
    Jiang W; Zhao B; Li Y; Qi D; Wang D
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Nov; 20(1):1129. PubMed ID: 33225924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of the seventh edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging system for gastric cancer: results from a Chinese monoinstitutional study.
    Sun Z; Wang ZN; Zhu Z; Xu YY; Xu Y; Huang BJ; Zhu GL; Xu HM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 19(6):1918-27. PubMed ID: 22246426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Prognosis of the 8th TNM Staging System for Penile Cancer and Refinement of Prognostication by Incorporating High Risk Human Papillomavirus Status.
    Wang B; Gu W; Wan F; Wei Y; Xiao W; Lu X; Zhang G; Zhou J; Wang Q; Ding X; Azizi M; Spiess PE; Ye D; Zhu Y
    J Urol; 2020 Mar; 203(3):562-569. PubMed ID: 31596650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.