215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31203290)
1. Added Value of Contrast Medium in Whole-Body Hybrid Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Comparison between Contrast-Enhanced and Non-Contrast-Enhanced Protocols.
Celebi F; Cindil E; Sarsenov D; Unalan B; Balcı C
Med Princ Pract; 2020; 29(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 31203290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of whole-body integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR in comparison to PET/CT for evaluation of malignant bone lesions.
Eiber M; Takei T; Souvatzoglou M; Mayerhoefer ME; Fürst S; Gaertner FC; Loeffelbein DJ; Rummeny EJ; Ziegler SI; Schwaiger M; Beer AJ
J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 24309383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Whole-body-MR imaging including DWIBS in the work-up of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a feasibility study.
Noij DP; Boerhout EJ; Pieters-van den Bos IC; Comans EF; Oprea-Lager D; Reinhard R; Hoekstra OS; de Bree R; de Graaf P; Castelijns JA
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1144-1151. PubMed ID: 24768188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contrast-enhanced PET/MR imaging versus contrast-enhanced PET/CT in head and neck cancer: how much MR information is needed?
Kuhn FP; Hüllner M; Mader CE; Kastrinidis N; Huber GF; von Schulthess GK; Kollias S; Veit-Haibach P
J Nucl Med; 2014 Apr; 55(4):551-8. PubMed ID: 24491410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simultaneous positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging for whole-body staging in patients with recurrent gynecological malignancies of the pelvis: a comparison to whole-body magnetic resonance imaging alone.
Grueneisen J; Beiderwellen K; Heusch P; Gratz M; Schulze-Hagen A; Heubner M; Kinner S; Forsting M; Lauenstein T; Ruhlmann V; Umutlu L
Invest Radiol; 2014 Dec; 49(12):808-15. PubMed ID: 25010207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of PET and MR datasets in integrated 18F-FDG PET/MRI: A comparison of different MR sequences for whole-body restaging of breast cancer patients.
Grueneisen J; Sawicki LM; Wetter A; Kirchner J; Kinner S; Aktas B; Forsting M; Ruhlmann V; Umutlu L
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Apr; 89():14-19. PubMed ID: 28267530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of combination of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography for evaluation of ovarian masses.
Tsuboyama T; Tatsumi M; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Kim T; Hori M; Sakane M; Hori Y; Morii E; Hatazawa J; Tomiyama N
Invest Radiol; 2014 Aug; 49(8):524-31. PubMed ID: 24637584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the utility of whole-body MRI with and without contrast-enhanced Quick 3D and double RF fat suppression techniques, conventional whole-body MRI, PET/CT and conventional examination for assessment of recurrence in NSCLC patients.
Ohno Y; Nishio M; Koyama H; Yoshikawa T; Matsumoto S; Takenaka D; Seki S; Tsubakimoto M; Sugimura K
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):2018-27. PubMed ID: 24012452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detectability of Malignant Lesions by Whole-Body Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Whole-Body Integrated Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Ishii S; Miyajima M; Suenaga H; Sugawara S; Nemoto A; Ukon N; Nambu T; Kubo H; Oriuchi N; Ito H
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2019; 43(4):664-670. PubMed ID: 31259851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Whole-body MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging: a valuable alternative to contrast-enhanced CT for initial staging of aggressive lymphoma.
Balbo-Mussetto A; Cirillo S; Bruna R; Gueli A; Saviolo C; Petracchini M; Fornari A; Lario CV; Gottardi D; De Crescenzo A; Tarella C
Clin Radiol; 2016 Mar; 71(3):271-9. PubMed ID: 26749081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography-computed tomography in oncology.
Schmidt GP; Kramer H; Reiser MF; Glaser C
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Jun; 18(3):193-202. PubMed ID: 17762383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diffusion-weighted imaging as part of hybrid PET/MRI protocols for whole-body cancer staging: does it benefit lesion detection?
Buchbender C; Hartung-Knemeyer V; Beiderwellen K; Heusch P; Kühl H; Lauenstein TC; Forsting M; Antoch G; Heusner TA
Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):877-82. PubMed ID: 23428414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Progressing Toward a Cohesive Pediatric 18F-FDG PET/MR Protocol: Is Administration of Gadolinium Chelates Necessary?
Klenk C; Gawande R; Tran VT; Leung JT; Chi K; Owen D; Luna-Fineman S; Sakamoto KM; McMillan A; Quon A; Daldrup-Link HE
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jan; 57(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 26471690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performing clinical 18F-FDG-PET/MRI of the mediastinum optimising a dedicated, patient-friendly protocol.
Peerlings J; Paulis L; Mitea C; Bakers F; Berbée M; Wierts R; Vöö S; Wildberger J; Hoffmann A; Lambin P; Mottaghy F
Nucl Med Commun; 2019 Aug; 40(8):815-826. PubMed ID: 31169592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-resolution whole-body magnetic resonance image tumor staging with the use of parallel imaging versus dual-modality positron emission tomography-computed tomography: experience on a 32-channel system.
Schmidt GP; Baur-Melnyk A; Herzog P; Schmid R; Tiling R; Schmidt M; Reiser MF; Schoenberg SO
Invest Radiol; 2005 Dec; 40(12):743-53. PubMed ID: 16304476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) compared to FDG PET/CT for whole-body breast cancer staging.
Heusner TA; Kuemmel S; Koeninger A; Hamami ME; Hahn S; Quinsten A; Bockisch A; Forsting M; Lauenstein T; Antoch G; Stahl A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2010 Jun; 37(6):1077-86. PubMed ID: 20204355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ionising radiation-free whole-body MRI versus (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT scans for children and young adults with cancer: a prospective, non-randomised, single-centre study.
Klenk C; Gawande R; Uslu L; Khurana A; Qiu D; Quon A; Donig J; Rosenberg J; Luna-Fineman S; Moseley M; Daldrup-Link HE
Lancet Oncol; 2014 Mar; 15(3):275-85. PubMed ID: 24559803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fast non-enhanced abdominal examination protocols in PET/MRI for patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NET): comparison to multiphase contrast-enhanced PET/CT.
Seith F; Schraml C; Reischl G; Nikolaou K; Pfannenberg C; la Fougère C; Schwenzer N
Radiol Med; 2018 Nov; 123(11):860-870. PubMed ID: 29961229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging versus contrast-enhanced 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for the detection of colorectal liver metastases.
Seo HJ; Kim MJ; Lee JD; Chung WS; Kim YE
Invest Radiol; 2011 Sep; 46(9):548-55. PubMed ID: 21577131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the accuracy of PET/CT and PET/MRI spatial registration of multiple metastatic lesions.
Rakheja R; DeMello L; Chandarana H; Glielmi C; Geppert C; Faul D; Friedman KP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Nov; 201(5):1120-3. PubMed ID: 24147486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
